U.S.A. –-(Ammoland.com)- On 1 October, 2019, the Supreme Court held a conference. One of the items to be decided was whether the Court would hear the Second Amendment case of NY STATE RIFLE & PISTOL V. NEW YORK, NY.
The Supreme Court had already granted Cert (agreed to hear the case). But the City of New York, fearing a poor outcome, had minimally changed the regulation, and lobbied the State of New York legislature to minimally change the law. Then the counsel for the City filed a petition with the Supreme Court, claiming the case was moot, there was no longer any valid reason to pursue the lawsuit.
The plaintiffs disagreed. They argued the changes were minimal and done to evade adhering to the Second Amendment.
The Supreme Court web site shows the New York case as being scheduled for oral arguments on 2 December 2019. This may simply be part of the Court’s administrative procedures. The court is the smallest of the three branches of the federal government. It is jealous of its power. The court guards its inner workings from the public view.
There are several cases important to the Second Amendment working their way toward a Supreme Court decision. Many of the lower courts have been hostile to restoring Second Amendment rights.
- The lower courts have refused to protect the right to keep and bear arms outside the home.
- The lower courts have refused to protect the right to keep and bear commonly owned rifles, magazines, and accessories.
- The lower courts have refused to protect the commercial sale of arms, and the private sale of arms.
- The lower courts have done this with sophistry and the changing of definitions to prevent the exercise of Second Amendment rights.
Many believe the Supreme Court did not accept these cases, because neither the originalists and textualists on the Supreme Court (Thomas, Scalia, Alito, and Roberts) or the “living document” progressives (Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan) could depend on what the swing vote, Justice Kennedy, would do. So, they mostly did nothing for ten years.
Justice Kennedy has been replaced by Justice Kavanagh. With Justice Gorsuch replacing Justice Scallia, the originalists and textualists should have a working majority. Justice Roberts appears to be stepping into Justice Kennedy’s role as a swing vote, but the swing has moved a bit toward originalist thinking.
Remington is about the protections afforded by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, the PLCAA. Remington is scheduled for the conference on 11 October; the Court may decide to hear the case at that conference.
Rogers is about the carry of arms outside the home in New Jersey, as is Cheesman, but from a bit different angle.
Cheesman is scheduled for the 18 October, 2019 Supreme Court conference, which will likely determine if the court will decide to hear the case.
Some writers believe the Democrats have pushed the Court too hard, with barely disguised threats to pack the court.
The odds are we will know if the Court will hear oral arguments in the NY STATE RIFLE & PISTOL V. NEW YORK, NY. case Monday morning, the 7th of October, 2019.
It is difficult to know what the Supreme Court will do, particularly in Second Amendment cases.
About Dean Weingarten:
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.