Louisiana’s powerful gun lobby is opposing legislation that would make it easier for domestic violence victims to obtain protective orders barring abusers from possessing firearms.

Instead, lobbyists are pushing a proposal that would reopen the so-called “boyfriend loophole” — a move that would allow certain abusive dating partners to hold onto their firearms.

What began as a bipartisan effort to streamline Louisiana’s definition of domestic abuse has now devolved into a fight over gun rights, pitting the National Rifle Association against victims’ advocates and state Rep. Malinda White — a domestic abuse survivor and enthusiastic gunowner.

“They’re dealing with the wrong woman. I believe in 2nd Amendment rights and I stand with them on almost everything,” said White, a Bogalusa Democrat. “But when it comes to domestic abuse, they shouldn’t be at the table — and they shouldn’t try to control the conversation.”

House Bill 159 proposes expanding the definition of domestic abuse to include select forms of non-physical, emotional abuse. That includes behaviors like coercion, control and intimidation, but only when it’s used to prevent a victim from escaping a relationship or contacting law enforcement. 

Experts argue the language better reflects the realities of domestic abuse and will help victims obtain protective orders before their circumstances escalate to physical violence.

But after sailing through a House floor vote with unanimous support, the state’s influential gun lobby began raising objections. They say the definition is too broad and will result in gunowners losing their firearms more often.

“It includes stuff that I wouldn’t do to a partner, and I certainly wouldn’t want a partner to do to me, but it’s not violence,” said Dan Zelenka, president of the Louisiana Shooting Association.

Domestic abuse, in most cases, doesn’t begin with violence, said Andrea Carroll, a law professor at LSU, who spent nearly four years crafting the new definition with experts at the Louisiana State Law Institute, a non-partisan arm of the Legislator.

Instead, the abuse starts with controlling behaviors, Carroll said.

But to obtain a protective order, a victim typically has to demonstrate they’ve already been physically or sexually abused. Oftentimes, that protection comes too late — and is one reason, experts say, Louisiana routinely leads the nation in its rates of domestic abuse fatalities.

“We’re telling victims ‘leave, leave, leave,’ yet we won’t provide any protection for you to leave until it escalates into physical violence,” said Mariah Wineski, executive director at the Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence. “It’s absurd that we would let it get that far.”

The definition proposed is actually quite narrow, Carroll argued. It’s not just any form of coercion, control and punishment. It’s that which prevents you from reporting to law enforcement, or prevents you from escaping the relationship.

“This allows a court to intervene at an earlier stage, before physical violence takes place,” Carroll said.

Still, Louisiana’s gun lobby argues the definition is too far-reaching and would result in more protective orders, which under existing state law, requires gunowners to forfeit their firearms. In Louisiana, those orders can only be issued after a due process hearing before a judge.

“The bill adopts the widest imaginable definition of ‘domestic abuse.’ Which, as we often say, includes conduct that is neither ‘domestic’ nor what we would traditionally consider ‘abuse’,” wrote Matthew Herriman, the NRA’s state director, in an email to White.

The gun lobby isn’t only targeting the new definition. Herriman, who declined to comment for this article, suggested amending HB159 to allow abusive dating partners that don’t live with their victims to keep their firearms — reinstating the so-called “boyfriend-loophole” in federal law.

White said she’s not budging on the definition – and won’t let them reopen the loophole. She said she’s tired of the NRA thinking they can bully the state Legislature and posted on Twitter that she’s “locked, cocked and ready to rock” for Tuesday when HB159 is expected appear before a Senate Judiciary Committee. 

For White, the issue is personal: when she was younger, she was trapped in a controlling relationship. “I know what it feels like to be isolated from the world,” she said. “Coercion and control is where it starts.”

White doesn’t shy away from her support for gun rights. She’s an avid hunter and was one of a handful of Democratic lawmakers this session to vote for legislation allowing gunowners to carry concealed handguns without first obtaining a permit. 

“We’ve got more guns than grass in Washington Parish,” White said. “I know how to shoot a gun and I never miss.” 

When it comes to issues of domestic violence, however, White said the gun lobby has no place in the debate. She said the NRA should be standing with victims of domestic abuse instead of supporting “terrorist” abusers. 

“I’m all about the 2nd Amendment, but I’m also about protecting life,” White said. “The blood is on [gun lobby’s] hands if people die because they’re not trying to protect life.”

Louisiana has the fifth highest rate of women murdered by men in the nation — a statistic that’s nearly twice the national average, according to the Violence Policy Center — and homicide is among the leading causes of death for pregnant women in the state, according to researchers at Tulane and LSU. 

Wineski, executive director at the Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence, said that if the state wants to prevent those homicides, it needs to recognize that domestic abuse doesn’t start with violence. She said domestic abuse is widely understood to be a “pattern of behavior” that most often begins with coercion and control. 

“I don’t think we’re inherently a more violent state,” Wineski said. “But we obviously have some systemic issues where offenders are not being held accountable early enough.”

Judge Lisa Woodruff-White, of the East Baton Rouge Parish Family Court, said that one of the worst cases of domestic violence she tried in her 13 years on the bench did not involve any physical violence.

“The facts in the case all pertained to the husband’s exercise of complete power and control over his wife such that she was deprived of any resources and imprisoned in their home,” Woodruff-White, who helped craft the bill, wrote in a letter to White. 

“A history of physical violence is not necessary for there to be a risk of abuse or death and the weapons prohibition is an important part of that protection,” Woodruff-White added. 

Kim Sport, an attorney and longtime advocate for victims of domestic violence, said the gun lobby lacks a clear understanding of the issue.

Sport said Zelenka, with the Louisiana Shooting Association, joked to her that the proposed legislation could be used to take firearms away from “sugar daddies” who take credit cards away from their girlfriends.

“This is beyond insulting, and shows a disturbing level of ignorance of the dangerous situations victims of domestic abuse find themselves in,” Sport said. 

Zelenka said his comment was meant as hyperbole to show how broadly the new definition could be interpreted. 

Carroll said, “My controlling my spouse’s finances is not going to qualify as domestic abuse unless I’m doing it for the purpose of preventing him from calling the police or preventing him from getting help or preventing him from escaping the relationship.”

The proposed legislation, in some ways, offers a narrower definition for domestic abuse than existing law, Carroll noted. 

The definition of “domestic abuse” under the existing protective order statute “includes but is not limited to physical or sexual abuse.” The beginning of that definition — “includes but is not limited to” — gives the judge discretion to consider other factors, like emotional abuse, but given its vagueness, few judges take that leap. 

Carroll noted that the proposed legislation, which was crafted alongside judges who will be interpreting the law, removes that open-ended clause and spells out the other circumstances concretely. 

Wineski said that when it comes to defining issues of domestic abuse, the gun lobby shouldn’t take precedent over those who know the issue best. 

“This bill is about defining domestic abuse, and that definition isn’t up to the gun lobby,” Wineski said. “That definition should come from subject matter experts. It should come from survivors. It should come from the people who have been doing the work to address domestic violence for decades.”