[ad_1]
This story was first published at The Progressive.
The United States is locked and loaded. This nation has more guns than people and, not surprisingly, an appalling level of gun violence.
The gun homicide rate in the United States is nearly eight times higher than the rate in Canada, and a whopping 100 times higher than in Britain. This year is shaping up to be particularly horrific. As of July 10, the United States had recorded more than 23,200 deaths from firearms, counting both suicides and unlawful killings, according to the Washington, D.C.-based Gun Violence Archive. We also have had more than 340 mass shootings (defined as an event involving four or more victims).
In any sane democracy, one might expect the highest court in the land to step in and do something to uphold sensible gun-control regulations when given the opportunity. But in fact, our Supreme Court is poised to do just the opposite in a case it will hear next fall.
The case is New York State Pistol Association v. Corlett. It was brought by two individuals and the state affiliate of the National Rifle Association to overturn a New York law that places strict limits on the issuance of concealed weapons permits.
Under New York’s regulatory scheme, people seeking such permits are required to demonstrate a special need for protection—”proper cause” in the words of the statute—to qualify. The NRA contends the law violates the Second Amendment. It wants even more guns on our streets and in our communities.
After losing in the lower courts, the plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court, where they are considered likely to prevail. With the addition of three Trump appointees—Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—conservatives now hold a solid 6-3 majority on our most powerful judicial body. No longer constrained by the need for caution and compromise, they are set to dramatically extend gun rights under the Second Amendment.
Should the New York statute be declared unconstitutional, similar measures in California, New Jersey, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and elsewhere could also fall, with dire and deadly consequences for public safety.
It’s worth remembering, as we prepare for the onslaught, that the Supreme Court wasn’t always a friendly venue for the NRA and the gun-rights lobby. To the contrary, prior to the court’s landmark 2008 ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller, the great weight of academic scholarship as well as the court’s 1939 decision in United States v. Miller had construed the Second Amendment, in keeping with the actual debates of the Constitutional Convention, as protecting gun ownership only in connection with service in long-since antiquated state militias.
Heller stood the prior consensus on its head, courtesy of the controversial 5-4 majority opinion in the case authored by the conservative fanatic Antonin Scalia. Scalia’s perspective emerged victorious, but not without an intense struggle inside the court. As Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by three of his colleagues, wrote in dissent:
The Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people of each of the several States to maintain a well-regulated militia. It was a response to concerns raised during the ratification of the Constitution that the power of Congress to disarm the state militias and create a national standing army posed an intolerable threat to the sovereignty of the several States. Neither the text of the Amendment nor the arguments advanced by its proponents evidenced the slightest interest in limiting any legislature’s authority to regulate private civilian uses of firearms.
In 2010, the court issued another 5-4 decision in McDonald v. Chicago, which extended Heller, holding that the individual right to bear arms is “incorporated” by the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause and is therefore applicable to the states and local governments. The Second Amendment, as interpreted by Scalia, thus became the law of the land. The amendment has since been elevated in rightwing circles to the status of holy writ.
Both Scalia and Stevens have since passed, but the clashing views they espoused on the Second Amendment have endured, even as the United States careens from one blood-stained catastrophe to the next, from the March 16 spa shootings in Atlanta, Georgia, which claimed eight lives; to the May 26 slayings in San Jose, California, in which ten people died; and the July 4 incident in Toledo, Ohio, in which one person was killed and eleven others were wounded.
Although Heller and McDonald were the products of extreme rightwing judicial activism, they were technically limited in scope, as they dealt with the right to keep guns in the home. Ever since those cases were decided, however, gun-rights groups have worked to bring a new test case to the Supreme Court to extend the right to bear arms beyond the home. They almost succeeded last year in another case from New York, but that appeal was ultimately dismissed.
Now, they have another vehicle in Corlett, which could well remove the last remaining judicial guardrails on the Second Amendment.
Woe to us all if that happens.
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
[ad_2]
Source link
465463 686740I havent checked in here for some time because I thought it was acquiring boring, but the last couple of posts are really great quality so I guess Ill add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend. insurance guides 832857
871160 894327I discovered your blog site on google and verify several of your early posts. Continue to sustain up the superb operate. I basically extra up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Searching for forward to reading extra from you in a even though! 228052
780371 29827I besides believe therefore , perfectly composed post! . 157323
617474 375193Hey, you?re the goto expert. Thanks for haingng out here. 52209
997038 210942Interested in start up a online business on line denotes revealing your service also providers not only to humans within your town, nevertheless , to numerous future prospects which are cyberspace on a lot of occasions. pays every day 618333
923220 773868This sounds in a way inflammatory pending mecant wait for thisthank you! 809710
353858 661015You produced some decent points there. I looked on the internet for that problem and located most individuals will go together with with the site. 943425
779944 769009Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything such as this before. So nice to get somebody with some original thoughts on this topic. realy we appreciate you starting this up. this fabulous site are some items that is required on the internet, somebody with slightly originality. beneficial function for bringing a new challenge on the world wide internet! 573836
778037 60891I like this web site quite much, Its a extremely nice position to read and receive info . 823591
300004 916097This internet page is known as a stroll-by for all of the information you wished about this and didnt know who to ask. Glimpse proper here, and youll positively discover it. 590431
44609 258968I adore your wordpress design, where did you obtain it from? 456104
967021 639350Hello my family member! I wish to say that this post is remarkable, great written and come with approximately all vital infos. I would like to see extra posts like this . 552354
524120 888054If you are interested in picture a alter in distinct llife, starting up normally the Los angeles Surgical procedures fat reduction method can be a large movement to be able to accomplishing which typically concept. lose belly fat 106721
729100 249432I took a break to view your article. I found it quite relaxing 767709
771447 133643A person essentially aid to make seriously articles I would state. This really is the first time I frequented your internet site page and thus far? I surprised with the research you created to make this specific publish incredible. Great job! 446704
271124 982824An fascinating discussion could be worth comment. I feel you must write on this topic, it may surely be a taboo topic but typically men and women are not enough to dicuss on such topics. To a higher. Cheers 944659
643480 506903replica watches are remarkable reproduction of original authentic swiss luxury time pieces. 200568
817374 216591Hey I was just seeking at your website in Firefox and the image at the top of the link cant show up properly. Just thought I would let you know. 756319
819678 731636Have you noticed the news has changed its approach recently? What used to neve be brought up or discussed has changed. Its that time to chagnge our stance on this though. 476361
560860 962048Sweet internet site , super pattern , quite clean and utilize friendly . 86207
670806 249244I enjoyed reading your pleasant website. I see you offer priceless info. stumbled into this website by chance but Im positive glad I clicked on that link. You undoubtedly answered all of the questions Ive been dying to answer for some time now. Will surely come back for much more of this. 844316
453280 168141But a smiling visitant here to share the really like (:, btw fantastic style and style . 605778
575925 566389Hello to all I cannot understand the approach to add your website in my rss reader. Assist me, please 894599
147501 878269I think one of your advertisements caused my browser to resize, you might want to put that on your blacklist. 367657
268302 24390The leading source for trustworthy and timely health and medical news and info. 224696