National Gun Rights Group Threatens to Sue San Jose over Proposed Gun Ordinance

Second Amendment

[ad_1]

A national gun rights group sent San Jose city leaders a cease-and-desist letter on Wednesday, just two weeks after the city council approved calling for an annual gun fee and mandating gun liability insurance.

The July 14 letter from the National Foundation for Gun Rights sent to Mayor Sam Liccardo and council members puts the city on notice that the group will sue if the city moves forward with plans for a citywide gun ordinance.

The organization is the legal division of the National Association for Gun Rights, a Second Amendment advocacy group that considers itself the “conservative alternative” to the National Rifle Association.

The foundation maintains the city would violate the Second Amendment by imposing a tax on “a select group of law-abiding citizens” exercising their right to keep and bear arms.

“A right that you have to pay a tax to exercise is not a right at all,” said Hannah Hill, spokesperson for the foundation. “You would not dream of imposing a tax to attend a church or to disseminate or read a newspaper, which are protected by the First Amendment.”

Executive Director Dudley Brown called the ordinance a “full-frontal assault” on gun owners “by the gun control zealots running the city of San Jose.”  The foundation sees the ordinance as unfair to law-abiding citizens, Brown said.

Liccardo, who met Monday with President Joe Biden and other mayors from around the country to discuss ways to stop gun violence, disagreed with the gun rights group’s assertions.

“In the realm of sensible gun regulation, the gun industry and their lawyers ensure that no good deed goes unlitigated,” Liccardo said in an email. “I suppose that I should not be surprised that they have threatened to sue the city before they’ve even seen a single word in the ordinance.”

Rachel Davis, press secretary for Liccardo, said the city will continue to draft the ordinance.

The “gun harm reduction” proposals approved by the San Jose City Council at the end of June include a mandate for gun insurance; impounding guns from those who do not comply with insurance mandates and other laws; and recording all gun purchases to mitigate gun straw purchases, among many other proposals.

A draft ordinance is expected to come back to the city council for a vote in September.

 

[ad_2]

Source link

Articles You May Like

Would America Be Safer Without the Second Amendment?
Brett Kavanaugh Would-Be Assassin’s Mom Cites His Transgenderism
Protests After School Board Suspends Football Players over Airsoft Photo
Chicago Has 32,000+ Shooting Victims in Last Decade Alone
At Least 30 Shot During Weekend In Democrat-Run Chicago

27 Comments

  1. 539297 436831When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four e-mails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Appreciate it! 543183

  2. 808145 887844undoubtedly like your internet site but you need to have to check the spelling on several of your posts. Several of them are rife with spelling troubles and I locate it quite troublesome to tell the truth nevertheless I will definitely come back once more. 504278

  3. 95130 792086An fascinating discussion is worth comment. I believe that you ought to write regarding this topic, it may possibly not be a taboo subject but normally persons are too couple of to chat on such topics. To one more location. Cheers 120729

  4. 926573 335636hello!,I like your writing so much! share we communicate extra approximately your post on AOL? I need to have an expert in this space to solve my dilemma. Maybe that is you! Seeking ahead to see you. 491657

  5. 83857 125787Extremely well written story. It will be valuable to every person who utilizes it, as properly as myself. Keep up the great work – i will undoubtedly read far more posts. 746032

  6. 5337 528062Excellent paintings! This really is the kind of information that need to be shared about the internet. Disgrace on Google for now not positioning this publish upper! Come on more than and speak more than with my internet site . Thanks =) 786905

  7. 576959 17584Spot up for this write-up, I seriously believe this web site needs a good deal more consideration. Ill apt to be once much more to learn additional, appreciate your that information. 954260

  8. 178565 442864Oh my goodness! an incredible write-up dude. Several thanks Even so My business is experiencing trouble with ur rss . Do not know why Struggle to sign up to it. Can there be everybody obtaining identical rss dilemma? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx 447343

  9. 274636 837087My wife style of bogus body art were being quite unsafe. Mother worked with gun very first, after which they your lover snuck no cost upon an tattoo ink ink. I was sure the fact just about every ought to not be epidermal, due towards the tattoo ink could be attracted from the entire body. make an own temporary tattoo 317093

  10. 192361 993171Hello there, just became alert to your blog by way of Google, and located that its actually informative. Im going to watch out for brussels. I will appreciate should you continue this in future. A lot of folks will probably be benefited from your writing. Cheers! 111615

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *