Federal court orders FEC to rule on NRA shell entity campaign allegation

Gun News

[ad_1]

A federal judge on Thursday said that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) must look into and take action on allegations that the National Rifle Association illegally carried out a shell entity campaign to coordinate with the election races of former President Donald Trump and other candidates. 

Judge Emmet Sullivan for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied the FEC’s motion to dismiss or provide summary judgment in the case resulting from the 2019 lawsuit filed by the Campaign Legal Action Center on behalf of the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. 

In the 2019 complaint, the Giffords Law Center, a gun control advocacy group connected to former Arizona Rep. Gabby Giffords (D), argued that the FEC had failed to take action on four separate complaints that the NRA “violated the Federal Election Campaign Act by using a complex network of shell corporations to unlawfully coordinate expenditures with the campaigns of at least seven candidates for federal office.” 

The complaint specifically noted that the contributions resulting from the alleged scheme included “up to $25 million in illegal contributions” to Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. 

Sullivan on Thursday granted the plaintiff’s request for action to compel the FEC to “comply with its statutory duty to act” on the complaints, noting that the election regulatory agency now has 30 days to take action on the complaints. 

David Pucino, senior staff attorney at Giffords Law Center, said in a statement shared with The Hill that the judge’s order was “a resounding win to keep dark money out of our politics.”

“Over the last several years and across election cycles, the NRA has been brazenly flouting campaign finance law by illegally funneling money to candidates while claiming to remain independent,” Pucino asserted. 

He went on to argue that “the NRA has used these tactics not just to obscure their contributions, but to violate spending caps, undermining the integrity of our elections and the rule of law.” 

“It is clear that the NRA will continue to violate the law until someone stops them,” he added. 

When contacted by The Hill, the FEC said it does not comment on pending litigation. 

The center had argued in its 2019 complaint that the NRA’s collections from shell entities far surpassed the limits set by the FEC, arguing that “illegal contributions to the Trump campaign alone are up to 9,259 times the limit set by Congress.”

NRA spokesman Lars Dalseide said in a statement to The Hill that the lawsuit is “a baseless effort engineered by anti-gun groups who want to silence the voices of our members.” 

“We welcome the FEC’s review so we can move on from this frivolous distraction,” the spokesman added. 

Updated at 10:09 a.m.

[ad_2]

Source link

Articles You May Like

Tim Walz Drops Special Session After ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban Falls Flat
Supreme Court Asked To Take Up Case Of Man Prosecuted For Lying About Marijuana Use While Buying Guns
Colt Canada Is Not ‘And Will Not Be Involved’ in the Canadian Buyback Program from Canadian Citizens
Florida lawmaker moves to lower gun purchase age as Supreme Court weighs case
One Dead After Shootings at South Carolina State University

25 Comments

  1. 295306 141322My California Weight Loss diet invariably is an cost effective and versatile staying on your diet tv show produced for individuals who find themselves planning to drop extra pounds and furthermore ultimately maintain a significantly healthier habits. la weight loss 67845

  2. 907913 583491Wow, incredible weblog format! How lengthy have you been blogging for? you make running a weblog glance easy. The full glance of your site is wonderful, as smartly the content material! 37154

  3. 184591 373572Excellent post nevertheless , I was wanting to know if you could write a litte far more on this subject? Id be really thankful in case you could elaborate a little bit further. Bless you! 221383

  4. 274787 596418An attention-grabbing discussion is worth comment. I believe which you really should write more on this matter, it wont be a taboo topic even so normally persons are not sufficient to speak on such topics. Towards the next. Cheers 846078

  5. 331094 645182The the next time I just read a blog, I actually hope that this doesnt disappoint me approximately brussels. Get real, Yes, it was my option to read, but I actually thought youd have some thing intriguing to say. All I hear is normally a couple of whining about something that you could fix when you werent too busy searching for attention. 681434

  6. 783774 602260Delighted for you to discovered this website write-up, My group is shopping a lot more often than not regarding this. This can be at this moment definitely what I are already seeking and I own book-marked this specific web site online far too, Ill often be maintain returning soon enough to appear at on your exclusive weblog post. 18938

  7. 450846 471336Cause thats required valuable affiliate business rules to get you started on participating in circumstances appropriate for your incredible web-based business concern. Inernet marketing 994399

  8. 853722 976403Thank you for writing this tremendous top quality write-up. The details in this material confirms my point of view and you really laid it out nicely. I could never have written an post this good. 507882

  9. 612951 610894Hello! I basically would wish to offer a huge thumbs up for that fantastic info youve here during this post. I is going to be returning to your internet site to get much more soon. 579214

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *