Infowars host Alex Jones loses defamation cases over Sandy Hook shooting ‘hoax’ conspiracy

Gun News

[ad_1]

A judge in the US state of Texas has found Infowars host and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones liable for damages in three defamation lawsuits brought by the parents of two children killed in the Sandy Hook school massacre.

Jones had claimed several times on his talk show the mass shooting was a “hoax”.

Judge Maya Guerra Gamble entered default judgments against Jones, Infowars and other defendants for what she called their “flagrant bad faith and callous disregard” of court orders to turn over documents to the parents’ lawyers. 

The rulings were issued on Monday and released on Thursday.

The cases now head to trial for juries to determine the amount of damages Jones and the other defendants will have to pay the families.

The Sandy Hook massacre

The shooting at the Newtown, Connecticut, school on December 14, 2012, killed 20 students in year one and six teachers. 

Activists hold placards protesting gun violence outside NRA HQ on the third anniversary of the Sandy Hook shooting.
Families of the victims of the Sandy Hook shooting have campaigned against gun violence and the National Rifle Association.(

Reuters: Jonathan Ernst

)

The gunman, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, fatally shot his mother at their Newtown home before going to the school, and killed himself as police arrived.

The shooting was portrayed on Jones’s Infowars show as a hoax involving actors designed to increase gun control. 

Jones has since acknowledged the school shooting did occur.

Families of some of the school shooting victims sued Jones, Infowars and others in courts in Texas and Connecticut over the hoax conspiracy, saying they had been subjected to harassment and death threats from Jones’s followers. 

The Connecticut cases remain pending.

Jones’s lawyers invoke free speech protections

Jones and his attorney in Connecticut, Norman Pattis, criticised the Texas judge’s ruling in a statement on the Infowars website.

“It takes no account of the tens of thousands of documents produced by the defendants, the hours spent sitting for depositions and the various sworn statements filed in these cases,” they said. 

“We are distressed by what we regard as a blatant abuse of discretion by the trial court. We are determined to see that these cases are heard on the merits.”

Jones’s lawyers have denied the defamations allegations and argued his comments about the school shooting were protected by free speech rights.

Alex Jones speaks into a loudspeaker at a pro-Trump protest against the election result in 2020.
Alex Jones speaks at a gathering of Trump supporters to protest against the results of the 2020 presidential election.(

Reuters: jim Urquhart/File photo

)

Bill Ogden, a Houston lawyer representing the four parents in the Texas cases, said Jones and Infowars had failed to turn over documents for the past few years. 

He added such default judgments were rare.

“My clients have and continue to endure Defendants’ 5-year campaign of repulsive lies,” Mr Ogden said in a statement, which quoted the judge’s ruling. 

“We believe the Court hit this nail on the head when it considered Alex Jones’ and Infowars’ ‘bad faith approach to this litigation,’ Mr Jones’ ‘public threats,’ and Jones’ ‘professed belief that these proceedings are show trials,'” he said.

Judge Guerra Gamble said in her rulings that she was defaulting Jones and the other defendants after an “escalating series” of admonishments by judges, monetary fines and other actions was ineffective in getting the defendants to turn over documents.

A history of defying court orders

In 2019, Jones was ordered by another Texas judge to pay $100,000 in legal fees to one of the parents’ lawyers for disregarding a court order to produce witnesses.

Jones also was sanctioned in the Connecticut cases for violating numerous orders to turn over documents and for an angry outburst on his web show against an attorney for some of the victims’ relatives. 

A judge barred Jones from filing a motion to the dismiss the case — a ruling that was upheld after being appealed all the way to the US Supreme Court, which declined to hear Jones’s appeal in April.

AP

[ad_2]

Source link

Articles You May Like

Lincoln Journal Star letters to the editor: Oct. 1-5
Two Dead, 3 Critical, After Two Groups Have Shootout in Alabama
One Dead After Shootings at South Carolina State University
Yes, we can prevent school shootings – The Battalion
Federal judge rules in favor of Alabama plaintiffs challenging ATF rule defining who qualifies as a firearms dealer

45 Comments

  1. 646506 964955I recognize there exists an excellent deal of spam on this weblog web site. Do you need to have help cleaning them up? I can aid among courses! 328356

  2. Pingback: Chat Online
  3. Pingback: My Site
  4. Pingback: Discord
  5. Pingback: Browser MMORPG
  6. Pingback: Fantasy MMORPG
  7. Pingback: Browser MMORPG
  8. Pingback: Fantasy MMORPG
  9. Pingback: Browser MMORPG
  10. Pingback: Fantasy MMORPG
  11. Pingback: Browser MMORPG
  12. Pingback: Browser MMORPG
  13. Pingback: Fantasy MMORPG
  14. Pingback: Fantasy MMORPG
  15. Pingback: Fantasy MMORPG
  16. Pingback: Browser MMORPG
  17. Pingback: Browser MMORPG
  18. Pingback: Free VPS
  19. Pingback: AQWorlds
  20. Pingback: AQWorlds
  21. Pingback: Fantasy MMORPG
  22. Pingback: AQW Server
  23. Pingback: Browser MMORPG
  24. Pingback: AQW
  25. Pingback: Skidson
  26. Pingback: AQW
  27. Pingback: AQWorlds
  28. 66778 364527Hello there, just became alert to your weblog via Google, and discovered that it is actually informative. Im gonna watch out for brussels. Ill be grateful if you continue this in future. Several men and women will probably be benefited from your writing. Cheers! 56801

  29. 709288 783383An fascinating discussion is worth comment. I believe that you ought to write regarding this subject, it may possibly not be a taboo subject but typically persons are too couple of to chat on such topics. To another location. Cheers 941330

  30. 756733 59789Aw, this became an incredibly nice post. In concept I would like to set up writing like that moreover – taking time and actual effort to produce an excellent article but what / points I say I procrastinate alot via no indicates appear to get something completed. 915104

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *