[ad_1]
President Biden is set to pull the plug on his nomination of David Chipman to lead the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, according to reports.
Mr. Chipman’s nomination had been stuck in limbo for months after lawmakers of both parties raised questions over his ties to the gun control advocacy group Giffords, which was founded by shooting victim and former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.
Mr. Biden is expected to withdraw Mr. Chipman’s nomination as soon as this week, according to The Washington Post, which first reported the story.
Republicans had been deeply critical of Mr. Chipman’s work with Giffords, saying that while with the group he advocated gun control policies that were too extreme. They said that made him unqualified to run the ATF, which is tasked with enforcing federal gun laws.
Scuttling the nomination was the right call, said Sen. Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee.
“Mr. Chipman’s long record as a partisan, anti-Second Amendment activist raised plenty of concerns about how he’d administer federal firearms laws,” Mr. Grassley said in a statement.
Mr. Chipman could have won confirmation if all the Senate Democrats had backed his nomination, but several of the chambers’ more moderate Democrats also raised questions about his positions.
Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, Jon Tester of Montana, Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona along with Angus King, a Maine independent who caucuses with Democrats, would not commit to supporting Mr. Chipman.
Administration officials and Democratic leaders had opened conversations with the lawmakers but apparently could not make headway.
“We’re working on it,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin, Illinois Democrat, said last month when asked if Mr. Chipman had the votes for confirmation.
Republican opposition to Mr. Chipman was fierce.
“The Senate has spent quite enough time flirting with this profoundly misguided nomination,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, said in a speech on the Senate floor.
“It’s time the Biden administration revisit this decision and send us somebody who fits that description,” he said. “There is no way this nominee is the best the Biden administration can do.”
Mr. Chipman’s nomination has been hailed by gun control advocates, but Second Amendment groups say he has advocated for extreme positions on firearms, including banning semiautomatic firearms and magazines.
The National Rifle Association, Gun Owners of America, and the National Association for Gun Rights had opposed his nomination.
As a result of the opposition, Mr. Chipman’s nomination deadlocked in the Democratic-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee in June. The administration still pushed for swift confirmation.
Attorney General Merrick Garland visited the ATF headquarters in July and used the visit to advocate for the nominee’s confirmation, saying Mr. Chipman would crack down on gun violence and firearms trafficking.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki repeatedly stressed Mr. Chipman’s qualifications and emphasized that he had the president’s full support.
“The president felt quite confident in his qualifications and his ability to lead the agency at a time where it hasn’t been led for many years,” she recently told reporters.
The ATF hasn’t had a confirmed director in six years. Since 2006, when Congress made the position a Senate-approved post, it has had only one confirmed director.
Mr. Chipman is the second pick to lead the ATF to be withdrawn in as many years.
Former President Trump last year pulled his nomination of Chuck Canterbury after a disastrous confirmation hearing before the GOP-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee.
Mr. Canterbury, the former national president of the Fraternal Order of Police, rankled senators with evasive answers during his 2019 confirmation hearing. The nomination languished for a year before Mr. Trump withdrew the nominee amid dwindling support from Republicans.
[ad_2]
Source link
826536 61050What a lovely weblog page. I will certainly be back again. Please maintain writing! 180277
743515 514602Precisely what I was looking for, thankyou for putting up. 13137
898691 387003Extremely excellent publish, thanks a great deal for sharing. Do you happen to have an RSS feed I can subscribe to? 73672
386754 232288you could have a great weblog here! would you wish to make some invite posts on my weblog? 232994
711812 35380I got what you mean , saved to bookmarks , quite decent internet site. 122169
567944 829643Lovely sharp post. Never considered that it was that effortless. Praises to you! 529798
147234 376152It can be tough to write about this subject. I think you did an excellent job though! Thanks for this! 897622
467327 905235Spot on with this write-up, I truly think this internet site needs considerably much more consideration. Ill probably be once more to read considerably much more, thanks for that information. 654928
492485 433834Its a shame you dont have a donate button! Id without a doubt donate to this brilliant weblog! I suppose for now ill settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I appear forward to fresh updates and will share this blog with my Facebook group. Chat soon! 591818
854582 703079Having been simply looking at beneficial weblog articles with regard towards the project research when My partner and i happened to stumble on yours. Thanks for this practical information! 266835
678572 486436As I web website possessor I believe the content matter here is rattling magnificent , appreciate it for your hard work. You must keep it up forever! Best of luck. 434384
528897 685455Constructive criticism is generally looked upon as becoming politically incorrect. 188829
591280 734520Spot ill carry on with this write-up, I truly believe this web site requirements a terrific deal a lot more consideration. Ill oftimes be once a lot more to see far far more, numerous thanks that information. 760002
176518 799729Hello! I basically would wish to offer a huge thumbs up for that wonderful information youve here during this post. I will be returning to your internet site to get far more soon. 227847
343774 975870Normally I do not learn post on blogs, nonetheless I would like to say that this write-up quite pressured me to check out and do so! Your writing style has been surprised me. Thank you, quite fantastic post. 532884
710489 844188Thank you for sharing with us, I conceive this web site genuinely stands out : D. 336468
786753 848006I agree with you. I wish I had your blogging style. 69743
198824 347539Merely a smiling visitor here to share the really like (:, btw great style and design . 976510
694751 311561The next time Someone said a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me just as significantly as this. Come on, man, I know it was my choice to read, but When i thought youd have some thing intriguing to say. All I hear is actually a handful of whining about something you can fix in the event you werent too busy searching for attention. 989605
814747 44363I enjoy your writing type, do maintain on writing! Ill be back! 608597