Last week, Judge Douglas P. Woodlock of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction that allows gun stores to resume operation in the Bay State as long as they adhere to a set of social distancing guidelines. The ruling is an important victory in the fight to protect Second Amendment rights during the ongoing COVID-19 crisis.
On March 23, Governor Charlie Baker issued COVID-19 Order No. 13, which required the closure of all businesses not deemed “essential.” The order did not designate gun stores as “essential” businesses.
On March 28, the Trump administration updated the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (“CISA”) guidance on the critical infrastructure that should remain open during state shutdown orders due to COVID-19. The guidance identified “Workers supporting the operation of firearm or ammunition product manufacturers, retailers, importers, distributors, and shooting ranges” as critical infrastructure.
Following the federal government’s determination, on March 31, Baker issued COVID-19 Order No. 21. Complying with the DHS guidelines, the order designated firearms retailers as “essential” businesses.
However, later that same day the Baker administration removed firearm retailers and shooting ranges from the list of essential businesses. This reversal was cheered by Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, who declared to her Twitter followers, “Gun shops and shooting ranges are NOT essential businesses during a public health emergency.”
On April 9, a group of Massachusetts gun stores filed suit to halt Baker’s gun store closure on Second Amendment grounds. Later that month, NRA and its state affiliate Gun Owners’ Action League filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs.
In the amicus brief, NRA made clear that Baker’s orders were an impermissible violation of the Second Amendment. The brief pointed out that in the landmark case District of Columbia v. Heller the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a total ban on the acquisition of a single class of firearm – handguns. Baker’s order effectively prohibited the acquisition of all classes of firearms in Massachusetts and therefore are illegal under Supreme Court precedent.
Further, the brief noted that Baker’s order was impermissible under First Circuit precedent. In the 2018 case Gould v. Morgan, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit adopted a controversial two-step analysis for Second Amendment cases. First the court must determine “whether the challenged law burdens conduct that falls within the scope of the Second Amendment’s guarantee.” If the measure does implicate the Second Amendment right then the court is tasked with determining what level of scrutiny to apply to the measure and whether the law is permissible under that level of scrutiny.
In Gould, the First Circuit “identified the core of the Second Amendment right as ‘the possession of operative firearms for use in defense of the home’ by responsible, law-abiding individuals.” As Baker’s order foreclosed the ability to acquire firearms for this purpose, the order struck at the core of the Second Amendment right.
The First Circuit also made clear in Gould that “A law or policy that burdens conduct falling within the core of the Second Amendment requires a correspondingly strict level of scrutiny.” Therefore analysis of the Baker orders demands strict scrutiny.
Strict scrutiny requires that the Government prove the restriction furthers a compelling interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. A closure of all firearms-related businesses is not narrowly tailored. Moreover, the state cannot demonstrate that a blanket closure of firearm retailers will directly or materially alleviate the harms posed by COVID-19 considering the plaintiffs challenging the order stated that they would abide by all social distancing and workforce requirements for the operation of essential businesses.
Woodlock’s order underscores the excessive nature of Baker’s actions, as the standard for obtaining a preliminary injunction is rigorous. A plaintiff must show that they are likely to succeed on the merits of the case, show that there is irreparable harm without the injunction, demonstrate that the balance of equities is in their favor, and establish that the injunction is in the public interest. In granting the preliminary injunction, Judge Woodlock made clear that Baker’s orders are likely unconstitutional, cause irreparable harm to Bay Staters’ rights, and that this attack on Second Amendment rights was against the public interest.
According to Reuters, Baker told the press that his office will review Woodlock’s order and stated, “[w]e will certainly comply with any kind of judicial ruling on anything.” Sincere compliance with a lawful court order would mark a welcome change in the Baker administration. In late 2018, the Baker administration declared its intent to defy court orders issued by the state’s courts pertaining to the issuance of firearms licenses before backing down in early 2019.
NRA will continue to monitor the situation in Massachusetts and work to ensure that Second Amendment rights are not a casualty of the COVID-19 crisis. Please visit www.nraila.org/coronavirus to stay up-to-date on this and other important COVID-19 related Second Amendment issues.
911165 543336This internet site is usually a walk-through you discover the info it suited you about it and didnt know who need to. Glimpse here, and youll surely discover it. 700332
548376 158171I gotta bookmark this internet site it seems extremely useful invaluable 956434
659536 165833You got a extremely good web site, Gladiolus I found it by way of yahoo. 627946
781270 451813Cause thats required valuable affiliate business rules to get you started on participating in circumstances appropriate for your incredible web-based business concern. Inernet marketing 536522
484722 484898That is the first time I frequented your website page and up to now? I amazed with the research you made to make this actual put up incredible. 249529
901063 431385A domain name is an identification label which defines a realm of administrative autonomy, authority, or control inside the Internet. Domain names are also critica for domain hostingwebsite hosting 303185
151323 746804I always was interested in this topic and nonetheless am, regards for posting . 821272
70963 625985Hi. Cool article. There can be a difficulty with the web internet site in firefox, and you may want to test this The browser will be the marketplace leader and a huge portion of folks will miss your excellent writing due to this issue. 767677
197367 649366if this post was likened to a flavor of yogurt, what flavor would it be? Banana, I believe. 275260
129830 311279Some genuinely excellent info , Gladiola I detected this. 263073
875886 857841You produced some initial rate factors there. I seemed on the internet for the difficulty and located most people will go along with together along with your internet site. 476821
178849 193292hello!,I like your writing so significantly! share we communicate extra approximately your post on AOL? I need to have an expert in this space to solve my difficulty. Maybe that is you! Searching ahead to see you. 525764
774898 35653I discovered your weblog web site web site on the search engines and check several of your early posts. Always preserve up the quite good operate. I lately additional increase Rss to my MSN News Reader. Seeking for toward reading significantly a lot more on your part later on! 482518
788103 543365Hi there very cool site!!Man .. Beautiful .. Superb. 563845
925329 579545I genuinely enjoy your internet site, but Im having a difficulty: any time I load 1 of your post in Firefox, the center with the internet page is screwed up – which is bizarre. Could I send you a screenshot? In any event, maintain up the superior work; I surely like reading you. 950538
611543 285039some truly fascinating info , nicely written and broadly speaking user genial . 444950
146404 597301I like your writing style genuinely loving this internet internet site . 902504