Let Them Eat Tweets
By Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson
Liveright. 266 pp. $26.95
‘Let Them Eat Tweets” is not, according to authors Jacob S. Hacker and Paul Pierson, about President Trump. As the titular play on Marie Antoinette’s famous quote suggests, the authors believe that American society is moving toward control by a selfish oligarchy, but they consider the tweeter in chief more consequence than cause.
They see the real threat to democracy as the Republican Party’s subservience to corporate and financial interests and a handful of the wealthiest Americans. In their view, the GOP’s dedication to the cause of plutocracy explains nearly every pernicious development in American public life: galloping economic inequality, declining state capacity, growing right-wing populism and white ethno-nationalism, and weakening democratic norms and majoritarian rule.
Hacker and Pierson – professors of political science at Yale and the University of California at Berkeley, respectively – make clear that they’re not claiming our politics are orchestrated by all-powerful plutocrats, like “Bond villains in a hidden lair inside a volcano.” But they offer a strong case that the Republican Party’s dependence on its top donors explains much of its trajectory in recent decades, culminating in the rise of Trump.
The authors have a knack for synthesizing complicated academic studies and explaining them concisely for popular audiences. They make particularly good use of political scientist Daniel Ziblatt’s work on the historical role played by European conservative parties in nascent democracies. Hacker and Pierson posit that the Republican Party, like elite-aligned parties in other times and places, faces a “Conservative Dilemma”: how to persuade ordinary citizens to vote for the party that represents the interests of society’s richest and most powerful members?
The conservative party may choose to offer material benefits to the nonelite classes, but that risks angering their plutocratic backers, and in any case left-wing parties inevitably will offer more. So conservative parties tend to play up social and cultural divisions instead. Sometimes, as in the case of Britain’s Conservative Party, this takes the form of a relatively benign appeal to working-class traditionalism. Unfortunately, the Republican Party has leaned more toward the pattern of the German conservative parties of the 1920s and early ’30s that inadvertently paved the way for uncontrollable radicalism. If a similar outcome in America is still unlikely, the extent to which our income inequality has become far worse than in other developed countries finds a parallel in the Republican Party becoming far more right-wing than conservative parties in the rest of the world.
In Hacker and Pierson’s telling, the plutocratic program – tax cuts for the richest, benefit cuts for the most vulnerable, and a free hand for corporate and financial interests – has never been popular. As the Republican Party, starting in the 1970s, embraced this unpopular agenda, it reduced the range of issues on which it could compete and thus the voters it could attract. Party elites soon realized that the only way to win majorities was by attracting white, working-class voters who resented rising minorities. The GOP thus was forced to outsource voter mobilization to populist entities skilled at ginning up racially based outrage among this target audience. These principally included the National Rifle Association, Christian right organizations such as Moral Majority, and conservative media firebrands such as Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.
This “plutocratic populism” that came to dominate the Republican Party delivered far more to the plutocrats than to the populists, although stacking the courts with socially and economically conservative justices served the interests of both. But as the party delegated the task of voter persuasion to “outrage groups” that had only disdain for swing voters and practical compromises, “the GOP increasingly lost the capacity to shape its own agenda and fight elections on its own terms.” It also set itself up for takeover by Trump, “a true master of outrage.”
The Republican Party also lost the ability to govern. Nearly its only legislative accomplishment during 2017-18, when it controlled both houses of Congress as well as the White House, was a massively regressive, deficit-busting tax cut. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ranks as one of the most unpopular pieces of legislation of the past quarter-century, second only to the GOP’s proposed Obamacare repeal. Hacker and Pierson observe that it’s practically an iron law of political science that politicians in a democracy aren’t supposed to go all in for reckless initiatives that even most of their supporters detest, yet “Republicans conjured up two unicorns in less than a year.”
Republican devotion to the cause of plutocracy seems a persuasive explanation for the party’s otherwise baffling behavior, but it isn’t the only conceivable one. Hacker and Pierson rarely consider the possibility that conservatives genuinely believe in the ideas they advance, rather than merely repeating the lines their plutocratic paymasters feed them, or that their ideas might have some basis in reality. Undoubtedly the Republicans’ top donors prospered mightily under Trump, but so too did regular Americans who benefited from record-low unemployment rates – at least until those gains were wiped out by the incompetent government response to the novel coronavirus.
Nor have Republicans or their top donors been as unified as the plutocratic paradigm suggests. The authors’ analysis doesn’t adequately account for phenomena such as compassionate conservatism, intraparty fights over issues such as reauthorization of the Export-Import Bank or policy proposals such as a border adjustment tax that pitted large corporate interests against one another.
Nonetheless, Hacker and Pierson accurately describe an overarching pattern of the super-rich using the Republican Party to tilt the American economy and political life in their favor. Their historical explanation of how the GOP became radicalized raises legitimate concerns that the party, its judicial appointees and its donor class will carry on “fomenting tribalism, distorting elections, and subverting democratic institutions, procedures, and norms” regardless of the electoral outcome in November. Those who would resist this development should carefully consider the analysis that Hacker and Pierson lay out in such convincing and depressing detail.
Kabaservice is the director of political studies at the Niskanen Center and the author of “Rule and Ruin: The Downfall of Moderation and the Destruction of the Republican Party, From Eisenhower to the Tea Party.”
343811 331511Spot on with this write-up, I actually assume this website needs considerably a lot more consideration. Ill probably be once much more to read far much more, thanks for that information. 350900
831376 651247You Lastly want the respect off your family and pals? 101739
651684 276939I recognize there is undoubtedly an excellent deal of spam on this weblog. Do you want help cleansing them up? I may assist in between classes! 178901
629311 698919A person necessarily lend a hand to make severely posts Id state. This is the extremely very first time I frequented your internet page and to this point? I surprised with the analysis you made to make this certain submit extraordinary. Magnificent process! 220261
683610 772703of course like your web-site nevertheless you need to have to check the spelling on quite some of your posts. Quite a few them are rife with spelling issues and I to uncover it very bothersome to inform the reality nevertheless Ill surely come back once again. 406487
723664 37242Hi my loved 1! I want to say that this write-up is remarkable, excellent written and incorporate almost all vital infos. I would like to peer far more posts like this . 906996
876772 549117hey there i stumbled upon your internet site searching about the internet. I wanted to let you know I enjoy the appear of things about here. Keep it up will bookmark for positive. 645639
616700 212982Very educating story, saved your website for hopes to read far more! 175942
57757 651496After study quite a few the websites on your personal internet website now, i truly like your means of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site list and will also be checking back soon. Pls consider my web-site likewise and tell me what you consider. 586086
857086 639198Highest quality fella toasts, or toasts. will most certainly be given birth to product or service ? from the party therefore supposed to become surprising, humorous coupled with enlightening likewise. greatest man speaches 159486
288057 652547I conceive this web site has very great indited content material material posts . 476656
512137 78218Greetings! Quick question thats completely off subject. Do you know how to make your web site mobile friendly? My web site looks weird when browsing from my apple iphone. Im trying to uncover a template or plugin that may be able to correct this problem. If you have any suggestions, please share. With thanks! 517585
678517 795844This is a terrific internet site, could you be interested in performing an interview about just how you created it? If so e-mail me! 183254
610631 192423There is noticeably a bundle to know about this. I assume you made certain nice points in features also. 781780
250647 870358Very fascinating details!Perfect just what I was looking for! 375114
321116 263837I see your point, and I totally appreciate your article. For what its worth I will tell all my friends about it, quite resourceful. Later. 577093
177999 181172You created some decent points there. I looked on the net for any difficulty and located most individuals goes along with together along with your website. 956987
325571 28556My California Weight Loss diet invariably is an cost effective and versatile staying on your diet tv show made for men and women who discover themselves preparing to drop extra pounds and furthermore ultimately maintain a a lot healthier habits. la weight loss 112599
193431 406605Its superb as your other articles : D, regards for posting . 449157
153522 235344Yeah bookmaking this wasnt a risky determination outstanding post! . 612038
906952 726877you use a fantastic blog here! do you wish to have the invite posts in my small weblog? 193607