Gun-control activists need to stop demonizing John Lott

Concealed Carry


The recent reaction of Griffin Dix to the appointment of John Lott as an adviser to the DOJ Office of Justice Program reflects the continued inability of the gun-control advocacy community to address the fundamental issues that prevent us from making an effective response to the problem of gun violence.

Lott’s book “More Guns, Less Crime” has become a flashpoint for arguments on both sides of the gun debate. On the one hand, the book is celebrated by the pro-gun lobby as a justification for ‘stand your ground’ laws and other legal rationales for armed self-defense. On the other hand, the book is condemned by gun-control activists as error-filled propaganda that promotes the false idea that guns are an effective response to fears about personal safety and threats of crime. As a long-time member of the Brady Campaign, Griffin Dix obviously belongs to the latter group.

The first edition of John Lott’s book was published in 1998. Over the previous decade, violent crime declined by almost 40 percent. At the same time, the number of states that granted concealed-carry licenses (CCW) without requiring proof of special need doubled from 15 to 30 states.

Lott argues that in many jurisdictions that began issuing CCW, violent crime such as robberies and assaults declined while anonymous crimes like burglary increased. He supports this finding with regression analysis that shows that crime rates are more sensitive to CCW issuance than to other demographic or social trends.

To counter Lott’s work, Griffin Dix cites a study by respected scholars John Donohue and Ian Ayers who produced seemingly contradictory results by substituting different sets of variables measured through alternate regression analysis models. In fact, producing critiques of Lott’s work has become something of a cottage industry among academic researchers, with critical reviews coming from Daniel Webster at Johns Hopkins, David Hemenway at Harvard, and Franklin Zimring at Berkeley, to name just a few.

The problem with all these efforts to discredit Lott’s thesis, however, is they fail to confront the most important assumption in his work, an assumption based on a misreading both by Lott and his critics of how and why gun violence actually occurs.

Lott’s thesis rests upon the idea that when a particular jurisdiction begins issuing CCW licenses, this process will make the criminals believe that their victims might be armed. Hence, criminals switch from in-person crimes like robbery and assault to impersonal crimes such as burglary where a live victim is rarely around.

Contrary to what Lott argues, intentional gun assaults are not committed by ‘bad guys’ against ‘good guys.’ Indeed, victims of violent assaults are overwhelmingly individuals who come from the same demographic groupings and neighborhoods as their attackers, and in as often as 50 percent of such assaults, the victim committed behavior that precipitated the violent event.

Lott’s critics, on the other hand, are wrong when they promote the idea that gun violence increases because more people are walking around with legal guns. Criminal gun injuries — homicides, aggravated assaults — are rarely committed by people with legal access to guns. The Violence Policy Center publishes an annual report, “Concealed-Carry Killers,” which after suicides are deducted, gives us roughly 100 fatal shootings committed by CCW-holders annually, which happens to be less than .007 percent of all fatal gun assaults each year.

What both Lott and his critics fail to acknowledge is that Americans increasingly believe that access to a gun is more of a benefit than a risk, a belief which continues to grow whether crime trends go up or go down.

A 2018 poll taken by NBC found that nearly 60 percent of Americans believe their home is safer if it contains a gun. Since somewhere between 30 percent and 40 percent of American households contain a legal gun, it would appear there are many Americans who do not own guns but nevertheless feel that having a gun around is more of a blessing than a curse.        

If gun-control activists are seriously committed to developing and implementing strategies that will reduce gun violence, they need to stop demonizing John Lott.

Instead, they need to develop a persuasive and effective narrative that will convince gun owners about the risk of owning guns. Until and unless this occurs, gun owners will continue to cite John Lott’s research as one of the reasons why they won’t give up their guns.

Michael R. Weisser has manufactured, imported and sold both law-enforcement and civilian guns since 1968. He wrote a weekly gun-violence column for Huffington Post and is a Patriot Life Benefactor member of the NRA.



Source link

Articles You May Like

ILA | Hawaii: Senate Public Safety Committee to Hear CCW Restriction/Reform Legislation
The wheel of gun violence keeps on rolling
California Gov. Gavin Newsom endorses even stricter gun control after string of mass shootings
ILA | Kansas: Contact Committee Members to Support Firearm Safety Education for Children
Gun industry, NRA create world of dread

18 Comments

  1. 909356 434842Spot up for this write-up, I really believe this internet site requirements a fantastic deal a lot more consideration. Ill likely to end up once more to read a good deal a lot more, many thanks for that data. 469961

  2. 746230 910438thank you dearly author , I identified oneself this web web site really beneficial and its full of exceptional healthy selective information ! , I as well thank you for the great food plan post. 727897

  3. whoah this blog is wonderful i really like reading your articles. Keep up the great paintings! You realize, a lot of people are hunting round for this info, you could help them greatly.

  4. 92141 476500I used to be recommended this internet site by my cousin. Im no longer certain whether this put up is written via him as nobody else know such exact approximately my dilemma. You are wonderful! Thank you! 365492

  5. 390235 589914Hello there! I could have sworn Ive been to this weblog before but after checking by way of some with the post I realized it is new to me. Anyhow, Im certainly glad I identified it and Ill be bookmarking and checking back regularly! 704095

  6. 637078 775502I used to be recommended this internet internet site by my cousin. Im no longer positive whether this put up is written via him as nobody else know such exact approximately my dilemma. You are remarkable! Thank you! 168763

  7. 778954 501252This sort of considering develop change in an individuals llife, building our Chicago Pounds reduction going on a diet model are a wide actions toward creating the fact goal in mind. shed weight 404239

  8. 177818 616714Admiring the time and effort you put into your website and in depth details you offer. Its very good to come across a weblog every once in a even though that isnt exactly the same out of date rehashed material. Excellent read! Ive saved your site and Im including your RSS feeds to my Google account. 94814

  9. whoah this blog is wonderful i really like reading your articles. Keep up the great paintings! You realize, a lot of people are hunting round for this info, you could help them greatly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *