North Dakota lawmakers set sights on ‘stand-your-ground’ legislation

Gun News

House Bill 1193 would allow anyone to use deadly force against an assailant without attempting to retreat from the situation. The so-called “stand-your-ground” legislation would expand the current “castle” law that permits the use of deadly force at one’s home or workplace but requires an effort to escape the attacker in other circumstances.

The North Dakota House of Representatives narrowly voted down a similar bill in 2019, but at least 25 states already have laws that allow the use of deadly force before retreating, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Rep. Jeff Magrum said he’s sponsoring the bill because it promotes victims’ rights to protect themselves from attackers in public. The Hazelton Republican added that the legislation is mostly oriented toward “women and younger people” because “a man might be able to fend (assailants) off with something.”

The push for the bill, which has attracted 11 Republican co-sponsors, is inspired by a 2019 shooting in which a volunteer security guard shot and killed an assailant in a Texas church, Magrum said.

House Majority Leader Chet Pollert, R-Carrington, declined to comment on Magrum’s bill, but he said “if someone comes at me with a gun in a public place, I don’t think I should back down.”

House Minority Leader Josh Boschee, D-Fargo, said Magrum’s proposal opens the door to false claims of self-defense by bad actors who were never in danger of serious harm. Rep. Karla Rose Hanson, D-Fargo, noted that similar laws in other states have negative impacts on people of color.


A 2015 study found that Florida defendants who claim the state’s stand-your-ground law are twice as likely to be convicted in a case with white victims compared to non-white victims.

The laws have also been associated with higher rates of homicide in states that have implemented them, according to a study published in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons. Magrum called the evidence of increased homicides “fake news,” saying opponents made similar arguments before the passage of the original castle law.

A handful of North Dakota residents testified in favor of Magrum’s bill on Monday, Jan. 25, during a meeting of the House Judiciary Committee. Several proponents said they live in rural areas, and an attacker would pose them imminent danger that required deadly force.

Speaking against the bill, Ward County State’s Attorney Roza Larson said North Dakotans already have protection against prosecution for using deadly force in cases where they face an imminent threat of bodily harm. Larson added that if the proposal were adopted it could cause a serious threat to public safety.

In pitching his bill to fellow members of the House Judiciary Committee, Magrum noted the National Rifle Association would likely factor a vote on the legislation into its lawmaker scorecard. Some conservatives wear the organization’s rating like a badge of honor, but Magrum’s thinly veiled insinuation was met with chuckles by lawmakers.

Source link

Articles You May Like

ILA | Arkansas: Stand Your Ground Legislation Could be Heard as Early as Tomorrow!
NRA accuses New York attorney general of ‘weaponizing’ power in new lawsuit
Gun Range Owners Vow To Fire Back If Attacked After Louisiana Shootout
Beto O’Rourke’s response to crisis rekindles speculation about his political plans.
ILA | North Carolina: Committee Advances Worshipper Protection Bill

1 Comment

  1. Actually more than twenty-five (25) states do not require a “duty to retreat”, or so called “stand your ground” states. If I recall correctly, there are currently thirty-six (36) states which are “SYG” states – either by case law or statutory law, including (to the surprise of many) California (by case law). With two (2) other states with pending legislation (ND and AR).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *