ILA | Australia’s “Common Sense” Gun Control Snares Nerf Blasters?

Gun News


We all know that among modern firearm prohibitionists, the term “gun control” is out. As a writer for the New York Times recently explained, the word “control” has a “ring of repression” to it. True, he admitted, “It’s accurate: The legislation in question entails more government control over who can purchase guns and when and how.” But for those actively seeking to impose such “control” over their fellow citizens, the language is “off key” and “unhelpful.”

In other words, when you actually are trying to oppress people, you certainly don’t want to talk about it openly. The repression itself is fine, even necessary, of course. But it’s gauche to be too blatant about it.

What’s in is the term “common sense.” Thus, when candidate Joe Biden set forth the most sweeping, prohibitory gun control agenda America had ever seen from a presidential contender, he made sure to characterize the proposals merely as “common-sense gun safety policies.”

And so it is in Australia. There, firearm ownership requires a permit, which in turn requires the applicant to specify a “genuine reason.” The law further specifies that “personal protection is not a genuine reason for owning, possessing or using a firearm.” This, according to the politician most responsible for the 1996 scheme that imposed these requirements, was “an exercise in common sense.”

It was also, as gun controllers like to say, only the “first step.” Later expansions would eventually encompass non-firearms like paintball guns. When this led skirmish sport enthusiasts to adopt the even milder alternative of “gel blasters,” the state of South Australia passed a 2020 law to ensure they, too, came under the law’s authority. Current owners were given six months to surrender their gel blasters or obtain a “firearms” license for them. Use was also limited to “licenced [sic] venues.” This was, according to a South Australian police official, “common sense.”

The South Australian police (SAPOL) reported that 3,882 “gel blaster firearms” were surrendered during the amnesty period. Residents who already owned gel blasters applied for a total of 460 new “firearms” licenses for them, as well as 136 variations to existing licenses. SAPOL, however, admitted that their own estimates put the number of gel blasters circulating in the state at 62,000, while retailers estimated the true figure to be 350,000.  

Now, it seems, even Nerf guns may be implicated by South Australia’s bizarre and repressive “exercise in common sense.”

Nerf guns are popular toys that expel harmless foam darts or disks. With their cartoonish designs, prominent logos, bright colors, and sometimes translucent parts, they are easily and instantly distinguishable from real firearms.

But some Australian skirmish enthusiasts discovered that certain models of Nerf guns can fire gel pellets without modification. Local news reports note that this has led to concerns these Nerf guns are also regulated under the state’s firearms laws, requiring owners to have them licensed and registered with local authorities.  

Nerf Mega Bigshock owner Brad Phillips told 7 News Australia, “I asked SAPOL (SA Police) whether I’d have to register it and they said yes I would.” Phillips noted he then dutifully took his Nerf gun to the Gawler police station, which completed the necessary formalities to render it legal, which included etching a serial number into the plastic. The $35 fee they charged appears to be about twice the retail price of the toy in Australia.

South Australian police are now backpedaling on the interpretation of the law given to Phillips. A statement SAPOL provided to The Guardian insisted, “Nerf Blasters are toys and there is no requirement to register any model of nerf blaster.”

Whatever the case may be, it’s hard to see how any of this actually makes anybody safer, while it’s easy to see how it creates confusion, uncertainty, and a chilling effect for anybody who desires to exercise what shrinking sphere of “gun-related” conduct remains legal.

Meanwhile, here in the U.S., the Biden administration took a long step in a similar direction by publishing a proposed rule that would unilaterally redefine what is considered a regulated “firearm” or “firearm frame or receiver” under federal law. We will have more information about this effort in other alerts, but suffice to say here that it would also create more perplexity and legal jeopardy among law-abiding citizens than clarity or crime reduction.

Of course, the man for whom Joe Biden served as vice president repeatedly invoked Australian gun control as a model the U.S. should emulate. Now, as president, Biden seems determined to turn that rhetoric into reality.



Source link

Articles You May Like

Trump endorses Bost over Bailey in Congressional race – NBC Chicago
Gun Owners of America announces ‘premiere’ Second Amendment convention | News
Ex-NRA chief Wayne LaPierre found liable for financial misconduct
Guides can help some voters decide | Business
Amanpour Claims ‘Law-Abiding Citizens’ Commit Most Murders

20 Comments

  1. 534408 633183Good post. I be taught one thing more challenging on totally different blogs everyday. It will all of the time be stimulating to learn content material from other writers and apply slightly one thing from their store. Id desire to use some with the content material on my blog whether you dont mind. Natually Ill give you a hyperlink on your net blog. Thanks for sharing. 190145

  2. 295620 31370Thrilled you desire sensible business online guidelines maintain wearing starting tools suitable for the particular web-based business. cash 816891

  3. 350752 576071Spot on with this write-up, I actually suppose this internet site needs rather a lot more consideration. most likely be once far more to learn much far more, thanks for that information. 559116

  4. 380045 649507Im agitated all these write-up directories. It confident would be good to have every article directory that instantly accepts articles. 575907

  5. 717595 347123Be the precise weblog in case you have wants to learn about this subject. You comprehend considerably its almost onerous to argue to you (not that I personally would needHaHa). You undoubtedly put a new spin for a subject thats been discussing for some time. Nice stuff, simply good! 160663

  6. 423408 125406Right after study some with the weblog articles for your site now, and that i truly like your method of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site list and are checking back soon. Pls consider my internet site too and inform me what you consider. 248523

  7. 280477 210868Not long noticed concerning your internet internet site and are nonetheless already reading along. I assumed ill leave my initial comment. i do not verify what saying except that Ive enjoyed reading. Nice blog. ill be bookmarking keep visiting this web web site really usually. 36029

  8. 928771 256299Superb read, I recently passed this onto a colleague who has been performing slightly research on that. And the man really bought me lunch because I came across it for him smile So allow me to rephrase that: Appreciate your lunch! 789706

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *