San Jose Passes First-in-Nation Law Requiring Gun Owners to Get Liability Insurance

Gun News


San Jose, California’s City Council on Tuesday passed a first-in-the-nation ordinance requiring gun owners to obtain liability insurance and pay an annual fee for their firearms, immediately drawing lawsuits from gun rights groups.

San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, a Democrat, said the City Council had voted in favor of both measures despite opposition from gun owners who said it would violate their constitutionally protected right to own firearms. The ordinance still needs to be approved at a final reading next month before it can take effect in the city of about 1 million in August.

Funds generated from fees paid by gun owners will be used to create “evidence-based initiatives to reduce gun violence and gun harm,” Liccardo said. As for the insurance provision, gun owners who don’t acquire insurance won’t lose their firearms or face criminal charges.

During Tuesday’s meeting, some members of the public said the ordinance unfairly penalizes lawful gun owners.

“This is not fair. To a person that has legally done nothing wrong, who owns a gun, to basically be reprimanded,” said Mike Grant, a member of the National Rifle Association. “You’ve gotta go after the criminal that is stealing the gun, committing the crime, and prosecute them.”

On Wednesday, the National Association for Gun Rights and several other groups filed a lawsuit against the City of San Jose, the San Jose City Council, and Jennifer Maguire, who is the city manager of San Jose, over the ordinance.

“We promised we would sue the City of San Jose if they actually passed this ridiculous tax on the right to keep and bear arms, and now we’re fulfilling that promise,” said Dudley Brown, President of the National Association for Gun Rights, in a statement. “To tax a constitutional right is absolutely preposterous and places an undue burden on law-abiding gun owners. Do the members of the San Jose City Council actually believe this will do anything to stop crime?”

The plaintiffs, in their suit (pdf), cited a Supreme Court ruling from 1943 that concluded the government cannot “impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution” and also cited a 2008 ruling that guarantees the right to possess and carry guns for self-defense.

“Because California and the City of San Jose have already made it exceedingly difficult to lawfully carry a weapon outside the home, and the Ordinance only affects owners of lawfully owned guns, the Ordinance’s true impact is solely on guns kept in the home by law-abiding citizens,” their lawsuit read. “It does nothing to deter the scourge of unlawful ownership and use of guns by criminals or to recoup from them compensation for the injuries and damage they cause.”

Jack Phillips

Follow

Jack Phillips is a breaking news reporter at The Epoch Times based in New York.



Source link

18 Comments

  1. 534908 946119Can I just say what a relief to search out somebody who genuinely is aware of what theyre speaking about on the internet. You undoubtedly know how to deliver a problem to light and make it critical. Extra folks require to learn this and perceive this facet of the story. I cant consider youre no much more common because you positively have the gift. 40754

  2. 29724 649481Excellent day. Really cool blog!! Man .. Outstanding .. Remarkable .. Ill bookmark your website and take the feeds additionallyI am glad to locate numerous useful information right here within the post. Thank you for sharing.. 195571

  3. 105000 673799 Spot on with this write-up, I truly believe this website needs much more consideration. Ill probably be once again to read considerably far more, thanks for that info. 7028

  4. 209257 510033You can definitely see your skills inside the work you write. The world hopes for a lot more passionate writers like you who arent afraid to say how they believe. At all times follow your heart 182651

  5. 211689 968261I like the valuable info you give inside your articles. Ill bookmark your weblog and check again here often. Im quite certain Ill learn lots of new stuff proper here! Finest of luck for the next! 489400

  6. 345703 587963Im glad I located your write-up. I would never have produced sense of this topic on my own. Ive read a few other articles on this subject, but I was confused until I read yours. 563552

  7. 143551 600929Jeden Tag stellt man sich die Frage Was Koche Ich Heute?! Zerbrechen Sie sich nicht den Kopf, besuchen Sie uns am besten direkt auf unserer Webseite uns lassen Sie sich inspirieren 371371

  8. 981603 918513Intending start up a enterprise about the web involves revealing marketing plus items not only to ladies locally, but somehow to several buyers who are web-based as a rule. e-learning 123659

  9. 653476 190279Aw, this was a very good post. In concept I wish to put in writing like this moreover ?taking time and precise effort to make an outstanding post?but what can I say?I procrastinate alot and definitely not appear to get one thing done. 861494

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *