Democrats decried dark money. Then they won with it in 2020.

Gun News


For much of the last decade, Democrats complained — with a mix of indignation, frustration and envy — that Republicans and their allies were spending hundreds of millions of difficult-to-trace dollars to influence politics.

“Dark money” became a dirty word, as the left warned of the threat of corruption posed by corporations and billionaires spending unlimited sums through loosely regulated nonprofits, which did not disclose their donors’ identities.

Then came the 2020 election.

Spurred by opposition to then-President Donald Trump, donors and operatives allied with the Democratic Party embraced dark money with fresh zeal, pulling even with and, by some measures, surpassing Republicans in 2020 spending, according to a New York Times analysis of tax filings and other data.

The analysis shows that 15 of the most politically active nonprofit organizations that generally align with the Democratic Party spent more than $1.5 billion in 2020 — compared with roughly $900 million spent by a comparable sample of 15 of the most politically active groups aligned with Republicans.

The findings reveal the growth and ascendancy of a shadow political infrastructure that is reshaping American politics, as megadonors to these nonprofits take advantage of loose disclosure laws to make multimillion-dollar outlays in total secrecy. Some good-government activists worry that the exploding role of undisclosed cash threatens to accelerate the erosion of trust in the country’s political system.

Democrats’ newfound success in harnessing this funding also exposes the stark tension between their efforts to win elections and their commitment to curtail secretive political spending by the superrich.

A single, cryptically named entity that has served as a clearinghouse of undisclosed cash for the left, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, received mystery donations as large as $50 million and disseminated grants to more than 200 groups, while spending a total of $410 million in 2020 — more than the Democratic National Committee itself.

But nonprofits do not abide by the same transparency rules or donation limits as parties or campaigns — although they can underwrite many similar activities: advertising, polling, research, voter registration and mobilization and legal fights over voting rules.

The scale of secret spending is such that, even as small donors have become a potent force in politics, undisclosed money dwarfed the 2020 campaign fundraising of President Joe Biden (who raised a record $1 billion) and Trump (who raised more than $810 million).

Headed into the midterm elections, Democrats are warning major donors not to give in to the financial complacency that often afflicts the party in power, while Republicans are rushing to level the dark-money playing field to take advantage of what is expected to be a favorable political climate in 2022.

At stake is not just control of Congress but also whether Republican donors will become more unified with Trump out of the White House. Two Republican secret-money groups focused on Congress said their combined fundraising reached nearly $100 million in 2021 — far more than they raised in 2019.

The Times’ analysis of 2020 data is likely incomplete: Lax disclosure rules and the groups’ intentional opacity make a comprehensive assessment of secret money difficult, if not impossible. Nonprofits come and go, adapting to shifts in political power and tactics. Some exist in the gray space between philanthropy and politics; many transfer money back and forth; and some can remain hidden in unexamined tax filings for years.

Yet a number of strategists in both parties said their own understanding comported with the Times’ findings that the left eclipsed the right in politically oriented nonprofit spending and sophistication in 2020.

That shift was fueled by several factors.

The big-money right was fractured over whether to support Trump’s reelection. Anti-Trump Republicans started new groups that were welcomed into the left’s big-money firmament: Defending Democracy Together, co-founded in 2018 by conservative pundit William Kristol, spent nearly $40 million in 2020 — $10.5 million of it from the Sixteen Thirty Fund. And Trump’s baseless claims about voter fraud hamstrung Republican efforts to compete with progressive groups that spent heavily to promote early and mail voting.

On the left, the prospect of a second Trump term spurred a new class of megadonors and helped allay lingering qualms about the corrosive effect of secret money among some Democrats.

“A range of donors — not just traditional progressive Democrats — had a wake-up call around 2019 where they realized that our constitutional republic was at risk, and that they had to compete through whatever financing vehicles they could, which resulted in a tremendous outpouring of support,” said Rob Stein, a longtime Democratic strategist and adviser to some of the party’s biggest donors.

Stein, who now focuses on finding common ground between the parties, worries that the increasing embrace of secret-money vehicles will usher in “an ominous new dark-money arms race” and further undermine fraying public trust in government and elections.

There is no legal definition of “dark money,” but it generally has been understood to mean funds spent to influence politics by nonprofits that do not disclose their donors. These groups are usually incorporated under the tax code as social welfare and advocacy groups or business leagues. Legally, these groups are allowed to spend money on partisan politics, but it is not supposed to be their primary purpose.

The Times also included a select few charities, which provide donors not only anonymity but also a lucrative tax deduction. Charities are supposed to completely abstain from partisan activity, but some have taken advantage of provisions in the tax code that allow them to engage in the political sphere through efforts that are technically nonpartisan, like voter education and registration. On the left, two charities raised tens of millions of dollars each for registration efforts that employed pinpoint targeting of demographic groups that typically vote Democratic.

The analysis also looked into two charitable groups, one aligned with Democrats and one with Republicans, which doled out millions of dollars in grants to nonprofits that engage in voter outreach and which spent millions more on litigation over voting rules.

The left’s advantage in secret spending holds true even if these charitable groups are excluded from the analysis.

Kevin McLaughlin, who oversaw the Senate Republicans’ campaign arm in 2020, marveled at how Democrats had “built an elaborate, multibillion-dollar dark-money network while simultaneously railing against the scourge of dark money.”

Republicans still gave heavily to political nonprofits in 2020, although the most well-funded efforts were primarily focused on Congress, underscoring how some donors remained committed to the party even when they were less enthusiastic about directly supporting Trump.

Two nonprofit groups affiliated with Republican House and Senate leaders were roughly at financial parity with three similar Democratic groups, according to tax records and interviews.

Beyond those nonprofits, McLaughlin said, “Republicans are bringing spitballs to a gunfight.”

Democrats’ Conflicted History

Back in 2005, Stein helped start the Democracy Alliance, which would grow into an influential club of some of the wealthiest donors on the left. Warning of the superiority of conservative infrastructure, he urged affluent liberals to create counterweights. They responded, seeding institutions like the turnout group America Votes, the Media Matters watchdog group and the Center for American Progress think tank.

But Democrats’ concerns about losing the big-money race spiked again after the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision. It expanded the kinds of permissible political spending by nonprofits and unleashed a torrent of dark money into elections, particularly on the right, where industrialists Charles and David Koch oversaw a political operation that came to outstrip the Republican Party financially.

Democrats publicly assailed the Koch operation as epitomizing a corrupting dark-money takeover of American politics. Privately, they plotted ways to compete.

Not long after Trump’s inauguration, Stein returned to the alliance with an alarming new analysis outlining how, by 2016, the right’s spending advantage had resulted in “political dominance” in 30 states and nationally.

As their outrage grew over Trump’s presidency, so, too, did Democrats’ giving. Money went to an array of nonprofits working to undermine Trump and to boost Democrats.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., who has sponsored legislation to crack down on secret spending, said the proliferation of dark money has unleashed a “tsunami of slime” that “disserves democracy.”

But he saw one potential silver lining. “With any luck, now that the Democrats are more seriously in the dark-money business,” he said, “Republicans actually might begin to support some transparency.”

Biden last year urged the Senate to advance legislation to rein in dark money, but it was part of a package that was blocked in January. The legislation would have closed a loophole that allows nonprofits to transfer secret money into super PACs.

In 2020, the two main super PACs devoted to helping Biden’s campaign received $37.5 million in dark money. The main super PAC devoted to Trump received $20.3 million from a linked nonprofit.

A Biden-backing nonprofit, Future Forward USA Action, with ties to Silicon Valley billionaires, raised $150 million in 2020 and transferred more than $60 million to an affiliated super PAC, while directly spending nearly $25 million on TV ads, almost $2.6 million on polling and analytics and $639,000 on focus groups, federal records show.

That group’s top data scientist, David Shor, has emerged as a leading Democratic strategist. “I try to elect Democrats,” his Twitter bio reads. Tax records show that he worked 35 hours a week in 2020 for the nonprofit, whose primary purpose is not supposed to be partisan. Future Forward said it advocated for candidates that supported its agenda “consistent with normal nonprofit organizations like ours.”

The lines were just as blurry on the right.

One Nation, a nonprofit affiliated with Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the Senate minority leader, transferred $85 million in 2020 to a linked super PAC, which in turn paid One Nation for rent, salaries and other costs.

In each case, had the donors given directly to the super PACs, their names would have been publicly disclosed. Because the money took an indirect route through a nonprofit, their identities remain unknown.

Political Chess Match

While the Kochs pioneered the use of centralized hubs to disseminate dark money to a broader network, the left has in some ways improved on the tactic — reducing redundancy, increasing synergy and making it even harder to trace spending back to donors.

One of the leading purveyors of this technique now is the Sixteen Thirty Fund, which serves as a fiscal sponsor, incubating and supporting an array of progressive projects. Amy Kurtz, the fund’s president, said those projects solicit donations to the fund and direct how the money is spent. All told, Sixteen Thirty provided grants to more than 200 groups — many operating in battleground states.

“While we are dedicated to reducing the influence of special interest money in our politics, we are also committed to level the playing field for progressives,” Kurtz wrote in a post about the group’s 2020 spending.

Sixteen Thirty is part of a broader network of progressive nonprofits that donors used to fill specific spaces on the political chessboard.

The groups in the network, which also included Hopewell Fund, New Venture Fund, North Fund and Windward Fund, were administered by a for-profit consulting firm called Arabella Advisors. Taken together, the Arabella network spent a total of nearly $1.2 billion in 2020, including paying Arabella a combined $46.6 million in 2020 in management fees, according to the funds’ tax filings.

While the Arabella-managed groups do not disclose their donors, foundations backed by some of the biggest donors on the left have disclosed major donations to the network. Pierre Omidyar, the billionaire eBay founder, disclosed personal and foundation gifts of $45 million to Sixteen Thirty and $1.6 million to Hopewell. A foundation backed by George Soros disclosed gifts of $17 million to Sixteen Thirty and $5 million to Hopewell.

Steve Sampson, an Arabella spokesperson, sought to downplay the firm’s role or comparisons to the Koch network, casting it as providing administrative services rather than strategizing how to build the extra-party infrastructure of the left. “We work for the nonprofit, not the other way around,” he said in a statement.

On the left and right, dark-money hubs mixed politically oriented spending with less political initiatives. The Koch network’s main financial hub gave $575,000 to the LeBron James Family Foundation. Hopewell gave nearly $3.8 million to a clinic that provides abortion services and more than $2 million to a Tulane University fund.

In weighing which nonprofits to include in its analysis, the Times considered their spending on politically oriented efforts as well as their relationships with allied groups. Some major institutions, such as the National Rifle Association and the Sierra Club, are involved in politics but were excluded because they spent heavily on membership-oriented activities.

The Times’ analysis includes three of the five Arabella-administered nonprofits, among them one charity, the Hopewell Fund. It donated to groups that work to reduce the role of big money in politics, but it also gave $8.1 million to a dark-money group called Acronym, which spent millions of dollars on Facebook advertising and backed a company called Courier Newsroom that published articles favoring Democrats and received millions of dollars from dark-money groups. It was paid $2.6 million by a nonprofit linked to House Democratic leadership to promote articles.

Hopewell also sponsored a project called Democracy Docket Legal Fund that filed lawsuits to block Republican-backed voting restrictions enacted across the country. It was led by a top Democratic Party election lawyer, Marc E. Elias. His firm at the time, Perkins Coie, was paid $9.6 million by Hopewell, according to tax returns, and an additional $11.6 million by the Biden-backing Priorities USA nonprofit group.

Two other groups, the Voter Participation Center and the Center for Voter Information, spent a combined $147.5 million in 2020 to register and mobilize voters. They described their targets as “young people, people of color and unmarried women” — demographics that tend to lean Democratic — and said they registered 1.5 million voters in 2020.

Tom Lopach, a former Democratic strategist who now runs both groups, said their work was apolitical and “an extension of civil rights efforts.”

Republicans Race to Close Gap

Some groups on the right spent dark money battling Democrats in court over voting laws.

An entity called the Honest Elections Project financed legal briefs defending measures that Republicans cast as protections against fraud but that were being challenged by Elias as hurdles to voting. It appears to have been the intended recipient of $4.8 million from a dark-money group known then as America First Policies, which was started by Trump allies and helped fund a pro-Trump super PAC.

Honest Elections was housed within a nonprofit called the 85 Fund, a charity that is part of a network formed by Leonard A. Leo, a conservative legal activist, to counter what he saw as the left’s increasing superiority in nonprofit political infrastructure.

Leo left his position as executive vice president of the Federalist Society last year to become chair of a company called CRC Advisors, modeled on Arabella. Leo said in a statement that Arabella and its affiliated nonprofits “have added significant firepower to the left’s political agenda.”

“We believe our enterprise can do the same for the conservative mission,” Leo said.

The Leo-linked groups — the 85 Fund, Rule of Law Trust and the Concord Fund — emerged as a dark-money force in 2020, spending $122 million on issues that animate the conservative base, including judicial confirmation fights.

But their resources paled in comparison to the biggest traditional dark-money powers on the right, which have drawn criticism from allies for backing away from Republicans during the Trump years.

Charles Koch expressed regret over his network’s financial backing of Republicans and proclaimed that his network had “abandoned partisanship” in favor of bipartisan efforts like overhauling the criminal justice system. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce was accused by a former political strategist of drifting to the left in the weeks before the 2020 election.

A handful of ventures on the right have aspired to fill the vacuum. Marc Short, who once ran the Koch political operation and later was a top Trump White House aide, raised $15 million for a group started last year to fight Biden’s domestic spending bill.

“There were some big battles that were going to be fought on taxes, and we did not see that there were groups that were prepared to fight them,” Short said.

Biden’s allies created their own dark-money nonprofit to rally support for the bill.


This article originally appeared in The New York Times.




Source link

Articles You May Like

Trio submits proposal to ban tracking firearms through purchases | National
Can KC shooting inspire enough GOP voters to make a change?
It’s hard to tell if it’s a ‘good guy’ carrying a concealed gun
Outdoors in RI: Ice fishing, a gourmet game dinner, 1791 leads the way in 2A – Jeff Gross
NRA leaders knock-back liberal pols ‘who want to exaggerate our death’: ‘We haven’t lost a beat’

139 Comments

  1. 556120 850728My brother suggested I would possibly like this weblog. He was once entirely right. This submit in fact made my day. You cant believe just how so significantly time I had spent for this details! Thank you! 469943

  2. 7375 670388Considerably, the story is in reality the greatest on this noteworthy subject. I agree together with your conclusions and will eagerly watch forward to your next updates. Saying nice one will not just be sufficient, for the great clarity inside your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates! 938986

  3. 657697 500040Check out our web site for data about securities based lending and more. There is info about stock and equity loans as nicely as application forms. 102831

  4. 968040 865337Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything in this way before. So good to uncover somebody with some original ideas on this topic. realy appreciate starting this up. this excellent website is something that is required more than the internet, a person if we do originality. valuable work for bringing something new towards the internet! 363900

  5. 137716 671368I discovered your blog web site on google and examine several of your early posts. Continue to preserve up the superb operate. I merely extra up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. In search of forward to reading a lot more from you later on! 595459

  6. You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be really something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and very broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  7. Pretty section of content. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to say that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I’ll be subscribing for your augment or even I achievement you access persistently fast.

  8. I used to be recommended this blog by means of my cousin. I am not sure whether this submit is written by way of him as no one else recognise such specified approximately my problem. You are amazing! Thank you!

  9. Oh my goodness! Incredible article dude! Thanks, However I am encountering difficulties with your RSS. I don’t know why I am unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody else getting identical RSS problems? Anybody who knows the solution will you kindly respond? Thanx!!

  10. It’s awesome to pay a visit this web site and reading the views of all friends concerning this piece of writing, while I am also keen of getting familiarity.

  11. Hi, Neat post. There is a problem with your site in internet explorer, might check this? IE still is the marketplace leader and a good part of other people will leave out your fantastic writing due to this problem.

  12. I do believe all the ideas you have presented on your post. They are very convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are too quick for newbies. May just you please extend them a bit from next time? Thank you for the post.

  13. Hi would you mind stating which blog platform you’re working with? I’m looking to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a tough time making a decision between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something completely unique. P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  14. Do you mind if I quote a couple of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your webpage? My website is in the very same area of interest as yours and my visitors would truly benefit from a lot of the information you present here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Thanks a lot!

  15. I love your blog.. very nice colors & theme. Did you design this website yourself or did you hire someone to do it for you? Plz answer back as I’m looking to design my own blog and would like to know where u got this from. thank you

  16. Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all folks you really realize what you are talking approximately! Bookmarked. Please also discuss with my site =). We could have a link change agreement among us

  17. I truly love your blog.. Very nice colors & theme. Did you make this site yourself? Please reply back as I’m looking to create my very own blog and want to learn where you got this from or what the theme is called. Thank you!

  18. Hey there! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my good old room mate! He always kept talking about this. I will forward this post to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read. Thanks for sharing!

  19. My programmer is trying to persuade me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using Movable-type on numerous websites for about a year and am worried about switching to another platform. I have heard fantastic things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress content into it? Any kind of help would be really appreciated!

  20. Thank you, I have recently been searching for information approximately this topic for ages and yours is the best I have found out so far. However, what about the conclusion? Are you sure about the source?

  21. Its like you read my mind! You seem to understand so much approximately this, like you wrote the guide in it or something. I feel that you simply could do with some % to drive the message house a bit, however other than that, this is magnificent blog. An excellent read. I’ll definitely be back.

  22. First off I want to say fantastic blog! I had a quick question that I’d like to ask if you don’t mind. I was curious to know how you center yourself and clear your mind before writing. I have had a tough time clearing my mind in getting my thoughts out. I do enjoy writing but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are wasted just trying to figure out how to begin. Any ideas or tips? Thank you!

  23. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your blog. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Outstanding work!

  24. I am extremely inspired with your writing talents and alsowell as with the format in your blog. Is this a paid subject or did you customize it yourself? Either way stay up the nice quality writing, it’s rare to see a nice blog like this one these days..

  25. I’m impressed, I must say. Rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head. The issue is something not enough people are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy that I stumbled across this in my search for something relating to this.

  26. Hello there, simply was aware of your blog thru Google, and found that it is really informative. I’m gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate in the event you continue this in future. A lot of folks might be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  27. I don’t even understand how I stopped up here, however I thought this publish was good. I don’t recognize who you are however definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you are not already. Cheers!

  28. I think what you postedwrotesaidbelieve what you postedtypedbelieve what you postedtypedsaidthink what you postedwroteWhat you postedtyped was very logicala lot of sense. But, what about this?think about this, what if you were to write a killer headlinetitle?content?wrote a catchier title? I ain’t saying your content isn’t good.ain’t saying your content isn’t gooddon’t want to tell you how to run your blog, but what if you added a titleheadlinetitle that grabbed a person’s attention?maybe get people’s attention?want more? I mean %BLOG_TITLE% is a little plain. You ought to look at Yahoo’s home page and watch how they createwrite post headlines to get viewers interested. You might add a related video or a related pic or two to get readers interested about what you’ve written. Just my opinion, it could bring your postsblog a little livelier.

  29. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any problems of plagorism or copyright violation? My site has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either authored myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my agreement. Do you know any solutions to help protect against content from being ripped off? I’d truly appreciate it.

  30. I think this is one of the most important information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few general things, The website style is great, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

  31. I do agree with all the concepts you have introduced for your post. They are very convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are too brief for novices. May you please extend them a bit from next time? Thank you for the post.

  32. You really make it seem so easy together with your presentation however I in finding this topic to be really something which I think I might never understand. It kind of feels too complicated and very vast for me. I am taking a look forward in your next publish, I will try to get the hang of it!

  33. My brother suggested I might like this website. He was totally right. This publish actually made my day. You cann’t believe just how so much time I had spent for this information! Thank you!

  34. We are a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your web site provided us with helpful information to work on. You have performed an impressive process and our whole community shall be grateful to you.

  35. Hi there I am so grateful I found your weblog, I really found you by mistake, while I was searching on Digg for something else, Anyhow I am here now and would just like to say many thanks for a incredible post and a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to go through it all at the minute but I have book-marked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal more, Please do keep up the excellent job.

  36. It is perfect time to make some plans for the future and it is time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I want to suggest you few interesting things or advice. Perhaps you could write next articles referring to this article. I want to read more things about it!

  37. We are a gaggle of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your site provided us with helpful information to work on. You have performed an impressive task and our whole community will be grateful to you.

  38. Ищете надежного подрядчика для устройства стяжки пола в Москве? Обращайтесь к нам на сайт styazhka-pola24.ru! Мы предлагаем услуги по залитию стяжки пола любой сложности и площади, а также гарантируем быстрое и качественное выполнение работ.

  39. Ищете профессионалов для механизированной штукатурки стен в Москве? Обратитесь к нам на сайт mehanizirovannaya-shtukaturka-moscow.ru! Мы предлагаем услуги по машинной штукатурке стен любой сложности и площади, а также гарантируем быстрое и качественное выполнение работ.

  40. 851586 463792I discovered your weblog web site on google and check a few of your early posts. Continue to maintain up the really great operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking forward to reading a lot more from you later on! 91303

  41. I like the valuable information you supply in your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and check again here frequently. I am relatively certain I will be told plenty of new stuff right here! Good luck for the following!

  42. Хотите получить идеально ровные стены без лишних затрат? Обратитесь к профессионалам на сайте mehanizirovannaya-shtukaturka-moscow.ru! Мы предоставляем услуги по машинной штукатурке стен по доступной стоимости, а также гарантируем устройство штукатурки по маякам стен.

  43. Please let me know if you’re looking for a author for your site. You have some really great posts and I think I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d absolutely love to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an e-mail if interested. Kudos!

  44. Hello there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a group of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a marvellous job!

  45. Good day I am so thrilled I found your website, I really found you by mistake, while I was searching on Google for something else, Anyhow I am here now and would just like to say thank you for a incredible post and a all round enjoyable blog (I also love the theme/design), I dont have time to look over it all at the minute but I have saved it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read much more, Please do keep up the excellent jo.

  46. Please let me know if you’re looking for a article author for your site. You have some really great posts and I believe I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d absolutely love to write some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please blast me an e-mail if interested. Cheers!

  47. Fantastic goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you’re just too fantastic. I really like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you’re stating and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it sensible. I can not wait to read far more from you. This is actually a wonderful website.

  48. We are a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your site provided us with helpful information to work on. You have performed an impressive activity and our whole community will probably be grateful to you.

  49. Hi there are using WordPress for your blog platform? I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and create my own. Do you need any coding knowledge to make your own blog? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  50. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your blog. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Outstanding work!

  51. Hi! I know this is kind of off-topic but I had to ask. Does building a well-established blog like yours take a massive amount work? I’m completely new to writing a blog but I do write in my diary daily. I’d like to start a blog so I will be able to share my experience and views online. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or tips for new aspiring bloggers. Appreciate it!

  52. Oh my goodness! Awesome article dude! Many thanks, However I am experiencing issues with your RSS. I don’t know why I am unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody else getting the same RSS problems? Anybody who knows the solution will you kindly respond? Thanx!!

  53. Unquestionably believe that that you stated. Your favourite justification appeared to be at the net the simplest thing to understand of. I say to you, I definitely get irked at the same time as folks consider worries that they plainly do not recognize about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top as smartly as defined out the whole thing with no need side effect , folks can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thank you

  54. Hello there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site before but after reading through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back often!

  55. You’re so cool! I don’t suppose I have read anything like this before. So nice to find someone with some unique thoughts on this issue. Really.. thanks for starting this up. This website is something that is needed on the web, someone with some originality!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *