[ad_1]
Stamford Public Schools were recently locked down when police received a call alerting them to a threat of an active shooter. I can’t begin to imagine the horror and fear of the students, staff and parents following the shelter in place order. Thankfully, it was quickly determined to be a hoax. But this situation serves as a very real and frightening reminder of the threat of gun violence.
And while the emotional and physical toll gun violence takes is immeasurable, gun violence comes with a significant economic cost. Experts
estimate
that gun violence costs Connecticut $2.6 billion per year in work-loss costs, police and criminal justice costs, and medical expenses.
So who will fight to protect us in Hartford? The answer is Rachel Khanna. Here’s why:
Kimberly Fiorello consistently votes against keeping us safe. She voted against Jennifers’ Law, which added protections against domestic violence, the No. 1 reported crime in Greenwich. She voted against updates to our red flag law, which now allows doctors and family members to petition the court to remove guns from someone deemed a danger to themselves or others. And she voted against establishing a community gun violence prevention and intervention program.
Kimberly Fiorello aligns herself with gun extremists, earned an A rating from the NRA, and remains silent while two of her Conservative Caucus colleagues sue to overturn our state’s assault weapons ban, a law passed with overwhelming bipartisan support following the tragedy at Sandy Hook.
Rachel Khanna is endorsed by Connecticut Against Gun Violence (CAGV) and is a Moms Demand Action Candidate of Distinction because she takes public safety seriously. I am confident that when it comes to protecting our community, Rachel is the best choice. Please vote for Rachel Khanna for state representative, 149th District, on Nov. 8.
Phyllis Behlen
Greenwich
[ad_2]
Source link
I may need your help. I tried many ways but couldn’t solve it, but after reading your article, I think you have a way to help me. I’m looking forward for your reply. Thanks.
It’s eenormous that you aree getting ideas from thks article as well as from oour dialgue made here.
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me.
Your article helped me a lot, is there any more related content? Thanks!