Gun Rights Advocates Make Their Case

Second Amendment

[ad_1]

New York’s stringent laws make it a ‘fat target’

The Supreme Court will take on a case that might result in a change in New York’s gun laws. (Mark Thomas | Pixabay)

The right to keep and bear arms took a major advance in the 2008 Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller. According to a summary of the case, ruled 5-4 with Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority, “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.”

The court followed that up with McDonald v. City of Chicago in 2010, extending the ruling to the states.

On April 26, the court decided to take up the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen. New York has one of the strictest laws regarding the right to carry a concealed handgun—it imposes a “proper cause” to issue permits. Users must demonstrate a compelling need for protection, such as carrying cash. In a press release supporting the case, the NRA stated that, “law-abiding citizens should not be required to prove they are in peril to receive the government’s permission to exercise this constitutionally protected right.”

The petitioners argued against the state’s “proper cause,” urging, “The time has come for this Court to resolve this critical constitutional impasse and reaffirm the citizens’ fundamental right to carry a handgun for self-defense.”

According to a Supreme Court document, the judges will decide on the following: “Whether the Second Amendment prohibits New York from requiring residents who wish to carry a concealed firearm in public to have an actual and articulable need to do so.”

banner

Eric M. Freedman, a constitutional law professor at the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University, noted that in agreeing to take up the case, the justices narrowed their inquiry. Instead of a sweeping rejection of all New York gun laws, they will limit the inquiry to the constitutionality of the petitioners being denied the permits.

“The mostly likely outcome is a narrow decision striking down what they perceive as the most extreme parts of the New York system. Or even a remand to the lower courts to consider it more closely,” Freedman said. “At the moment, it does not appear to be headed toward a blockbuster statement.”

He noted that the highest court has not taken up a gun case since McDonald in 2010, despite dozens of chanced to do so.

Freedman said he knows and respects Paul Clement, the counsel for the petitioners, and “we talk frequently.”

He went on to say that the original petition wanted the court to rule on whether the Second Amendment allows the government to prohibit law-abiding citizens from carrying weapons outside the home for self-defense. If the Supreme Court were to decide on Clement’s take, he noted, “any prohibition on carrying guns outside the home would be unconstitutional.”
Freedman added, “The way they rewrote it was, whether the state’s denial of petitioners’ applications for concealed carry licenses for self defense violated the Second Amendment.

In other words, was there some error in denying these particular individuals? Under New York’s system, you have to apply for a license and explain your reasoning. You can transport your weapon between the home and the gun range. But if you’re going to walk around the streets with it, then you have to have a license which explains that you carry lots of cash or are a prominent politician.”

Though they are confirmed for life, justices are sensitive to public opinion, Freedman argued, and they go to great lengths to avoid appearing “too political,” even if the court is steeped in politics.

He went on to say that the justices all pay lip service to precedence, and rarely reverse previous rulings. They are also guided by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Justice counsel that the Supreme Court should not take huge steps, but to move inch by inch over time.

Freedman believes that since last summer the court, with conservatives holding a 6-3 majority, has made a number of rulings “that dramatically reduced the credibility of the court as a body driven by law and moving judiciously as a body should. So it’s a plausible speculation that now, when they take on the issue of gun control, they seek to do it in a more moderate and limited way to demonstrate that they are exercising judicial restraint.”

Even when writing his Heller opinion, Justice Scalia affirmed, “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited…nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

Freedman said that Scalia added the paragraph on regulations to secure the fifth vote.

Ultimately, he said, “The New York State system, which is stringent by national standards, is thought to be a fat target from the perception of [gun rights advocates]. The advocates pick these cases carefully and the justices do as well. They’ve had New York in their sights for a long time because it’s tempting target.”

Freedman believes that the case will be decided next spring.

[ad_2]

Source link

Articles You May Like

Federal judge rules in favor of Alabama plaintiffs challenging ATF rule defining who qualifies as a firearms dealer
Bond Arms ‘First Lady’ Derringer: Class, Strength, Beauty
Supreme Court Asked To Take Up Case Of Man Prosecuted For Lying About Marijuana Use While Buying Guns
Across the aisle: shootings, safety and the Second Amendment
Florida lawmaker moves to lower gun purchase age as Supreme Court weighs case

28 Comments

  1. 69271 536417I dont agree with this specific write-up. Even so, I did researched in Google and Ive identified out that you are correct and I had been thinking within the incorrect way. Continue producing quality material similar to this. 710979

  2. 284002 320390I believe this really is among the most vital information for me. And im glad reading your post. But wanna remark on couple of common items, The site style is perfect, the articles is genuinely excellent : D. Excellent job, cheers 356914

  3. 610387 139038Do you mind if I quote a couple of your posts as long as I give credit and sources back to your website? My blog is inside the exact same location of interest as yours and my visitors would truly benefit from some with the information you offer here. Please let me know if this ok with you. Thanks! 40057

  4. 262446 918182Generally the New york Weight Loss diet is definitely less expensive and flexible staying on your diet scheme intended for measures even so rapidly then duty keep a nutritious daily life. weight loss 263489

  5. 466234 780803Aw, this was an exceptionally good post. In concept I would like to spot in writing such as this moreover – spending time and actual effort to create a superb article but so what can I say I procrastinate alot by way of no indicates find a strategy to go completed. 562318

  6. 763822 623490Does your blog have a contact page? Im having a tough time locating it but, Id like to send you an e-mail. Ive got some suggestions for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, fantastic internet site and I look forward to seeing it expand over time. 924626

  7. 638379 182315I like what you guys are up also. Such intelligent function and reporting! Maintain up the superb works guys Ive incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I believe itll improve the value of my internet site . 744415

  8. 183946 647308Incredibly very best man toasts, nicely toasts. is directed building your own by way with the wedding celebration as a result are supposed to try to be witty, amusing and consequently unusual as nicely as. very best mans speech 253109

  9. 890080 700917Hi, you used to write superb articles, but the last several posts have been kinda boring I miss your super writing. Past several posts are just slightly out of track! 566371

  10. 436858 896782Outstanding weblog here! In addition your internet site rather a good deal up quick! What host are you the usage of? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as quick as yours lol 866582

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *