[ad_1]
Sign up for our PoliticsNY newsletter for the latest coverage and to stay informed about the 2021 elections in your district and across NYC
Conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices on Wednesday appeared willing to strike down New York state’s limits on carrying concealed handguns in public in a major firearms rights case that could imperil certain restrictions nationally.
The justices heard about two hours of arguments in an appeal by two gun owners and the New York affiliate of the National Rifle Association, an influential gun rights group closely aligned with Republicans, of a lower court ruling throwing out their challenge to the state’s law, enacted in 1913.
Lower courts rejected the argument by the plaintiffs that the law violates the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The lawsuit seeks an unrestricted right to carry concealed handguns in public.
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority is considered sympathetic to an expansive view of Second Amendment rights.
New York’s law requires applicants to state a specific reason for needing a gun for self-defense.
“Why isn’t it good enough to say ‘I live in a violent area and I want to defend myself?’” conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh asked.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito wondered why only “celebrities, state judges and retired police officers” should be able to carry concealed guns as opposed to “ordinary, law-abiding” citizens.
Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts raised doubts about New York’s practice of giving unrestricted licenses more freely in more rural areas compared to densely populated centers like Manhattan given that the Second Amendment has been found to protect the right to self-defense.
“How many muggings take place in the forest?” Roberts asked New York Solicitor General Barbara Underwood, who was defending the law.
Underwood highlighted the need to regulate concealed guns to promote public safety, noting that the prospect of proliferating firearms in the New York City subway system “terrifies” a lot of people.
Conservative Justice Samuel Alito pushed back on her argument, contenting that there are people with illegal guns already on the subway and other public areas. “But ordinary hard-working people … they can’t be armed,” Alito said.
New York’s law requires a showing of “proper cause” for carrying concealed handguns. To carry such a weapon without restrictions, applicants must convince a state firearms licensing officer of an actual, rather than speculative, need for self-defense.
A ruling striking down the New York law would lead to new legal questions in the future including how local governments can regulate firearms in sensitive places such as government buildings, public transit, sports stadiums, schools, universities, sites of protests and drinking establishments.
Paul Clement, the lawyer for the challengers, said prohibitions at government buildings and schools probably would pass muster but others would have to be examined on a case-by-case basis.
Some justices voiced concern about whether a ruling against New York might restrict states and localities from imposing prohibitions at sensitive locations. Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett wondered about New York City’s massive annual celebration in Times Square on New Year’s Eve.
‘GUN-RELATED CHAOS’
The court’s three liberals signaled concern about expanding gun rights.
Noting that guns can be dangerous, liberal Justice Stephen Breyer said there could be situations in which even people of “good moral character,” including inebriated fans at a packed sports event, could “end up dead.” Breyer challenged the lawyer for the challengers on what the court should do to “not produce a kind of gun-related chaos.”
The case could yield the most important gun rights ruling in more than a decade. The court in 2008 recognized for the first time an individual’s right to keep guns at home for self-defense, and in 2010 applied that right to the states.
After being denied unrestricted concealed-carry licenses, gun owners Robert Nash and Brandon Koch, along with the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association, sued in federal court.
New York has justified its law by arguing that analogous restrictions run from medieval England through the founding of the United States and ever since.
Advocates for gun restrictions fear that the New York case could threaten other state and local measures such as “red flag” laws targeting the firearms of people deemed dangerous by the courts, expanded criminal background checks for gun buyers or restrictions on selling untraceable “ghost” guns.
Eight states including New York empower officials to decide whether people can carry concealed handguns in public even if they pass criteria such as criminal background checks. New York has said that about two-thirds of applications for unrestricted permits are granted in the state, amounting to tens of thousands annually.
Gun rights, held dear by many Americans, are a contentious issue in a nation with high levels of firearms violence. President Joe Biden has called gun violence a “national embarrassment.”
The Supreme Court’s ruling is due by the end of June.
[ad_2]
Source link
111829 166302You produced some decent points there. I looked on-line for any problem and identified most individuals will go in conjunction with together with your website. 960967
622259 128063 I discovered your weblog internet site on google and check several of your early posts. Continue to maintain up the very very good operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking forward to reading more from you later on! 286842
374301 566871Should you are interested in imagine a alter in distinct llife, starting up typically the Los angeles Surgical procedures fat reduction method is a large movement so that you can accomplishing which normally idea. lose belly fat 734693
276698 732014I respect your piece of work, appreciate it for all of the interesting content material . 157288
314148 420947I identified your weblog on yahoo and can bookmark it currently. carry on the good work. 818383
852143 732473As I website possessor I believe the content matter here is rattling great , appreciate it for your efforts. You must maintain it up forever! Best of luck. 80550
351268 678048Hi, you used to write exceptional articles, but the last several posts have been kinda boring I miss your super writing. Past several posts are just a bit out of track! 250653
747474 195704Howdy! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team of volunteers and starting a new project in a community in the same niche. Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a outstanding job! 373995
37232 146489More than and over once again I like to take into consideration this troubles. As a matter of fact it wasnt even a month ago that I thought about this really thing. To be honest, what is the answer though? 55182
440673 54793Thanks for the data provided! I was obtaining for this data for a long time, but I wasnt able to locate a reliable source. 345366
897935 400876What a lovely weblog page. I will undoubtedly be back again. Please keep writing! 495111
963113 165909I always was interested in this subject and still am, thankyou for posting . 322159
86510 595946for yet one more fantastic informative post, Im a loyal reader to this blog and I cant stress enough how much valuable info Ive learned from reading your content material. I genuinely appreciate all the hard function you put into this wonderful weblog. 707051
841107 114982Glad to be one of a lot of visitants on this awing internet site : D. 29201
227829 955957There is noticeably lots of funds to understand about this. I suppose you created specific good points in functions also. 460732
351404 175196Spot on with this write-up, I genuinely suppose this website needs much more consideration. probably be once more to learn way more, thanks for that info. 965384
179560 567327You ought to join in a contest for starters with the highest quality blogs online. I will recommend this page! 34731
529429 595537Das beste Webdesign Berlin erhalten Sie bei uns, genauso wie professionelles Webdesign. Denn wir sind die Webdesign Agentur mit pfiff. 76513
640115 562777one of the greatest system I know, thank you quite considerably . 166988
956637 414738Hello. Wonderful job. I did not expect this. This really is a excellent articles. Thanks! 222464
376164 365385hi this post assist me full . .in the event you want watches men pay a visit to my internet sites is extremely help you for males watches. .thank man great job. 538898
42158 263601Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility beadlets for beagles that grow aerobically-fifth edition. 615893
281487 674923So, is this just for men, just for ladies, or is it for both sexes If it s not, then do girls want to do anything different to put on muscle 107997
355623 325527This is a very good subject to talk about. Sometimes I fav stuff like this on Redit. I dont think this would be the top to submit though. Ill take a appear around your web site though and submit something else. 183721
200908 920552Ive been absent for a whilst, but now I remember why I used to adore this web site. Thank you, I will try and check back more often. How regularly you update your site? 484950
477090 149252Cool text dude, keep up the very good work, just shared this with the mates 49152
460047 433411I like this web website quite a lot, Its a genuinely good billet to read and obtain information . 29629