ILA | That’s Not How Research Works

Gun News

[ad_1]

The NRA calling research papers “anti-gun” may sometimes come across as dismissive or reflexive, or both. Some researchers work to keep their papers sterile, no matter their findings. Others grant themselves leeway to be more bombastic, particularly when it comes to developing theories that explain their findings. Researchers from the University of Central Missouri and the University of Alabama at Birmingham posted a paper online that makes their anti-gun slant abundantly clear through both their text and their model specifications.

David B. Johnson and Joshua J. Robinson posted their paper, “Gun Dealer Density and its Effect on Homicide,” online earlier this month. It has not been peer-reviewed or published in a journal. Johnson and Robinson make several emotional, hyperbolic claims about gun ownership and gun dealers that would likely not be accepted if written in a research paper turned in by a student. The variables excluded from their preferred models initially suggest unfamiliarity with crime data or research, but the use of some variables in later models shows the exclusion was by design. The variables that were included in their preferred model suggest problems with specificity and the exaggeration of small changes in rates shows a commitment to their narrative over sincere analysis.

Let’s start at the beginning of this 32-page paper – a count that excludes the abstract, references, and appendices. In the first paragraph, Johnson and Robinson utilize the tragedy at Sandy Hook to categorize the difference in the number of “gun-related deaths” per year between the individual years 2000 and 2019. The authors make no mention of the fact that most “gun-related deaths” are self-inflicted, or that the population of the U.S. grew by about 50 million people between those years. They also forgot to mention that the homicide rate was lower from 2009 through 2014 than it was in 2000 but that’s a detail that doesn’t promote gun grabbing.

As is the state of existing research: “Much of the literature on firearms – particularly concerning its connection to homicide and crime – is full of null and mixed results.” Johnson and Robinson set out to resolve that unacceptable problem, which just must be the result of a misunderstanding of the relationship between gun availability and homicides, by “creating” a new metric: the number of federal firearm licensees per mile. They do not differentiate between types of FFLs or volume of sales, so a small home-based FFL that transfers a few guns a year is treated the same as a large-volume retailer like Cabela’s.

Instead, they correlate the number of FFLs per mile with the number of NICS checks. NICS checks, readers may know, are the background checks dealers are required by law to run before a sale. The authors correlated required background checks with those required to run background checks. Groundbreaking.

To validate their measure of gun dealer density, they compare metrics using heat maps. Theirs is the only metric that shows north-central Colorado with a high density, and it includes several communities that suffered mass murder attacks, so theirs must be the best. These professors actually used a small number of rare, high-profile incidents to validate a measure they’re using in an analysis spanning decades and the entire contiguous United States. That isn’t a validation – it’s a confirmation of bias.

Alaska and Hawaii are excluded for some reason. Oh, and any year prior to 2003 is also excluded. Their key variable is lagged, for some reason. The authors claim that NICS data is available from 2004 on, but the FBI has data from November 1998 through the present readily available. Also readily available are variables known to be associated with crime in generals and homicides specifically – variables like law enforcement resources, arrest rate, crime itself, poverty rate, unemployment rate, and alcohol consumption.

They tout the effect of gun density they supposedly found, but this model found that homicide increases as income increases and decreases as the percent of men in a population increases.

Those are backwards. Think about it. Men commit most homicides, and crime is known to be associated with lower incomes or poverty. It does not make sense for there to be less homicide as there are more men in a community or there to be more homicide as income increases.

Those are the results of the choice the researchers made, and they clearly made those choices to find a connection between firearms and a negative outcome.

They got what they wanted, but it’s a sadly transparent effort.

The authors seem to believe that “secondary markets” in places like Chicago contribute to violent acts, despite all guns sold by an FFL requiring a background check whether the gun is new or used. They also think that the ATF-reported “time to crime” that shows criminals use a firearm, on average, more than 10 years after it was legally sold, is irrelevant because gun dealers “regularly sell used guns.” Dealers are required to run a NICS check on used guns, too, and criminals don’t buy their guns from dealers. Johnson and Robinson are aware of this research, but it doesn’t support an anti-gun narrative so it’s discounted.

Comments on this paper could easily fill more space than we have. We’ll leave readers with this statement from the authors: “The decrease in the percentage of corporate retailers in these communities also may indicate an increase in the percentage of nearby dealers willing to bend or break federal gun laws.”

That’s not a good way for FFLs to stay in business – and nothing invites ATF and FBI scrutiny quite like breaking federal law.

The researchers may be well aware of that fact and willing to ignore it. They’ve certainly demonstrated their willingness to ignore reality throughout their paper.

[ad_2]

Source link

Articles You May Like

No Open Carry in Winn-Dixie Despite Florida Law
Four Dead, Numerous Injured in Shooting at ‘a Gathering’ in Mississippi
Over 6,200 Murders in Chicago During Last Decade
Across the aisle: shootings, safety and the Second Amendment
Child Shot and Killed in Chicago’s Washington Park

24 Comments

  1. 530550 181967Today, I went to the beach front with my kids. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She put the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear. She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is completely off topic but I had to tell someone! 162033

  2. 769582 63044You made various excellent points there. I did a search on the subject and found many people will have exactly the same opinion along with your weblog. 99484

  3. 970739 159590 You produced some decent points there. I looked on the internet for the issue and identified most individuals will go along with with your site. 116266

  4. 799230 214604This design is steller! You most undoubtedly know how to maintain a reader entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (nicely, almostHaHa!) Wonderful job. I really loved what you had to say, and more than that, how you presented it. Too cool! 806851

  5. 281268 205438You need to participate in a contest for among the very best blogs on the internet. I will recommend this web site! 718159

  6. 782196 405696Thank you for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research on this. We got a grab a book from our area library but I think I learned more clear from this post. Im quite glad to see such outstanding data being shared freely out there. 351300

  7. 823687 366790Hey, you used to write wonderful, but the last couple of posts have been kinda boring I miss your tremendous writings. Past few posts are just just a little out of track! come on! 418231

  8. 603619 330153Aw, this is an incredibly good post. In thought I would like to put in location writing like this moreover – spending time and actual effort to create a excellent article but exactly what do I say I procrastinate alot via no indicates seem to get something accomplished. 522914

  9. 400498 484241Highest quality fella toasts, or toasts. will most surely be given birth to product or service ? from the party therefore supposed to become surprising, humorous coupled with enlightening likewise. very best man speaches 252263

  10. 491317 159076Echt tolle Seite. Rubbish bin eigentlich nur per Zufall hier gelandet, aber ich bin jetzt schon complete von der tremendous Seite beeindruckt. Gratuliere dazu!! Viel Erfolg noch durch der sehr guten Home-page mein Freund. 490090

  11. 998144 356096Oh my goodness! a great post dude. Thanks a good deal Nevertheless I will likely be experiencing trouble with ur rss . Dont know why Not able to sign up for it. Is there everybody acquiring identical rss concern? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx 359817

  12. 1358 477354Some genuinely good and utilitarian info on this website, as well I believe the style has got excellent functions. 399954

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *