Judge Denies Request to Block Law Sharing Info With Gun Violence Researchers

Gun News

[ad_1]

SAN DIEGO—A San Diego federal judge has denied a request from gun owners for a temporary restraining order to block a newly signed state law that allows their personal information to be shared with a research center studying gun violence.

The suit filed earlier this month by the National Rifle Association on behalf of five gun owners identified as John and Jane Does—three of whom are San Diego County residents—seeks to block enforcement of Assembly Bill 173, which amended state laws to allow disclosure of gun owners’ personal information to the California Firearm Violence Research Center at University of California—Davis.

The research center also has discretion to make the information available “to any other nonprofit bona fide research institution accredited by the United States Department of Education or the Council for Higher Education Accreditation, as specified, for the study of the prevention of violence.”

According to the law, the identifying information may “only be provided for research or statistical activities” and any reports utilizing the information cannot identify specific people.

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB 173 into law in September.

U.S. District Judge Larry Alan Burns denied the temporary restraining order request, and noted in a written ruling that researchers receiving the information “are barred from public dissemination of personal information, and must submit any research based on the data to DOJ for pre-publication review to ensure that the manuscripts don’t contain any information identifying specific individuals.”

Burns also said the gun owners had not shown that AB 173 would cause immediate harm necessary for an emergency measure such as a temporary restraining order.

The plaintiffs may still file for a preliminary injunction in the case. That motion will be heard in Burns’ court on March 8.

The lawsuit, which names California Attorney General Rob Bonta as the sole defendant, alleges the plaintiffs “disclosed their personal information in reliance on the government’s assurance that their information would only be used for law enforcement purposes,” and claims that disclosure of their information will subject the plaintiffs to “unwanted public attention, harassment, threats and physical violence by individuals and groups including persons in the community who are hostile to guns and gun owners.”

The lawsuit alleges that AB 173 does not have an adequate enforcement mechanism in place to ensure gun owners’ confidentiality once their information is shared with the research center.

In a statement announcing the lawsuit’s filing, NRA Institute for Legislative Action Executive Director Jason Ouimet said gun owners’ information is “being handed over to organizations that have no duty to safeguard it. This will do nothing to prevent crime—it will only serve to put law-abiding gun owners at risk.”

A California Attorney General’s representative said earlier this month that Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office “will continue to enforce and defend the state’s laws, including AB 173, and its provisions that seek to improve public safety by providing research institutions with the data they need to study gun violence in order to help us prevent it.”

City News Service

Follow

[ad_2]

Source link

27 Comments

  1. 530907 63079Not long noticed concerning your internet web site and are nonetheless already reading along. I assumed ill leave my initial comment. i do not verify what saying except that Ive enjoyed reading. Nice weblog. ill be bookmarking maintain visiting this internet web site genuinely generally. 322202

  2. 146593 816824We dont trust this remarkable submit. Nevertheless, I saw it gazed for Digg along with Ive determined you could be appropriate so i ended up being imagining within the completely wrong way. Persist with writing top quality stuff along these lines. 285154

  3. 731275 970931An intriguing discussion is worth comment. Im sure that you merely write regarding this subject, may possibly not be considered a taboo topic but typically persons are too little to communicate on such topics. To one more. Cheers 882048

  4. 373144 41904I dont believe Ive read anything like this before. So great to uncover somebody with some original thoughts on this topic. thank for starting this up. This internet site is something that is required on the internet, someone with a little originality. Excellent job for bringing something new towards the internet! 883124

  5. 506864 185651I discovered your weblog web site internet site on the search engines and check several of your early posts. Always maintain up the really good operate. I recently additional increase Rss to my MSN News Reader. Looking for toward reading considerably a lot more on your part later on! 28121

  6. 457099 387937Wonderful blog here! Also your site loads up fast! What host are you utilizing? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as fast as yours lol 253157

  7. 970728 489522Hello, Neat post. There can be a dilemma with your website in internet explorer, could test thisK IE nonetheless could be the marketplace leader and a large portion of men and women will leave out your superb writing due to this issue. 719886

  8. 589570 229118Great post nonetheless , I was wanting to know should you could write a litte far more on this topic? Id be quite thankful in case you could elaborate just a little bit further. Bless you! 377258

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *