Reloading: How Much Does New Brass Versus Fired Brass Matter?

[ad_1]

You will now and then read of a reloader or a competition shooter who only loads in new or once-fired brass. Why would they do that? And what’s wrong with mixed brass, even range pickups? Simple: consistency. They want all their brass to be matched, so they can obtain the gilt-edged accuracy they desire. The question we all have to ask is, does it matter? And if it does, by how much?

To test this, I selected a Les Baer Heavyweight Monolith 1911 in .45 ACP, a Ransom Rest and one of my go-to loads: an Oregon Trails 200-grain lead semi-wadcutter and a charge of VihtaVouri N-310. It’s a brilliantly accurate load. For a jacketed load, I went with Hornady’s excellent XTP in 200 grains and WW-231 powder.

I have gallons and gallons of much-used .45 ACP brass, so I simply pulled the first bin off the shelf. My mixed-brass bins are simply various brands, headstamps and number of firings brass—inspected for cracks or other defects. For new brass, I used unfired brass from Starline.

The process was simple. I loaded 50 rounds of the Oregon Trails load into the used, mixed cases. Without changing anything I then loaded 25 rounds in the brand-new Starline cases. I swapped the bullet seater for the XTPs, changed to WW-231, and repeated. Fifty rounds of XTP in used cases, then 25 in new.

banner

The process was simple. I set up the Ransom Rest on a heavy shooting bench at the club, got the Monolith seated and aimed and started checking point of impact and consistency. Once I had it reasonably centered on the target, and the groups seemed settled down (it takes a while for Ransom Rest inserts to get settled), I proceeded to use the mixed-brass lead bullet load for additional settling and bore-conditioning. I then used the last 25 rounds of that for record, measuring five five-shot groups. With everything settled in nicely, I used the Starline brass ammo and recorded five five-shot groups of that.

Then, since the Monolith was on paper, I changed to some conditioning ammo that also used Hornady XTPs and WW-231. After 25 rounds of that, I shot the remaining 25 rounds I’d handloaded for record, measuring five five-shot groups. Then repeated the recording with the 25 rounds of Starline brass and the Hornady XTPs.

The results, after all this work, will be underwhelming to some. The new Starline brass shaved only an average of 0.3 inch off of the groups at 25 yards. That, however, can be a big deal to a competition shooter. At 50 yards, that is half an inch, and that can mean points kept, that would have otherwise been lost, if the groups had been larger.

The Hornady load managed even less of an improvement, but look where it started. The mixed-brass XTP load was shooting just barely over an inch at 25 yards, and making those groups tighter is pretty difficult.

What was more interesting were the velocities. The velocities for both were higher with the new brass, and they were more consistent as well. For a shooter who has to meet a power level, the smaller deviations in velocity means they are better-protected from an errant round pulling them below the threshold. I once shot a big match once with ammunition that fell ever so slightly below Major, and spent the week shooting a Major-recoiling handgun but getting scored Minor. Trust me, it was not fun.

For the serious competitor, anything that avoids losing points is a technical detail to have. Improved accuracy, more consistent velocity, these are things that matter when the gap between winning and placing second is a small percentage of the overall performance.

There’s also the incalculable advantage of confidence. Knowing that new brass is going to deliver the best possible performance boosts your mental performance. In other words, if you think it helps, it probably does.

Now, what is the cost of this advantage? At the moment, used brass costs whatever it takes to pick it up at the gun club. And if you shoot and reload long enough, you too will have gallons of mixed brass. Starline .45 ACP brass, at the moment, costs $165 per 1,000 rounds. So, it is a question you and your wallet have to answer. As much as I like and respect the folks at Starline, for a lot of shooters, that $165 is probably better spent, at the moment, on more bullets, powder and primers.

Brass-Versus-Fired-Results

[ad_2]

Source link

Articles You May Like

Gen Z Rep. Justin J. Pearson on Gun Violence, Activism and Being a Young Legislator
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine tries to sneak through his signature on the transgender bathroom bill: Today in Ohio
Letter: There are issues that can’t be left to Alberta politicians
Police still waiting for answers from politicians | Letters To Editor
Women challenge Pa. Firearms Act | News, Sports, Jobs

28 Comments

  1. So for the majority of shooters it really won’t make much difference if they use fired brass over new (other then cost that is)

  2. Velocity are stasticaly the same, 5fps difference in standard deviation is nothing, probably within the accuracy limits of you chronograph amazingly close, I have been buying the reloaded once ammo from freedom munitions and it is good stuff. Shoot more is the answer

  3. Very interesting, but it only applies to that caliber, .45 auto. It is fairly well known that the .45 is quite tolerant with mixed brass loads. Try this in a 9 mm and it may just water your eyes! Or how about mixing in military brass, 7.62 with .308? You can get into trouble very quickly.

  4. I have used brass that I use for 380,9mm,38,45 ACP,7.62×39 and 3006 but I am not shooting competition all I want to do is put a hole close to where I am shooting at or bringing home some meat I can do that just keep it clean sized and trimmed and I am good

  5. 900139 846634So, is this just for men, just for girls, or is it for both sexes If it s not, then do women require to do anything different to put on muscle 734264

  6. 225859 710957It can be tough to write about this topic. I think you did an exceptional job though! Thanks for this! 709387

  7. 676103 435137Considerably, the story is in reality the greatest on this noteworthy topic. I agree together with your conclusions and will eagerly watch forward to your next updates. Saying good one will not just be sufficient, for the fantastic clarity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates! 359583

  8. 171856 70945Excellent post. I previousally to spend alot of my time water skiing and watching sports. It was quite possible the very best sequence of my past and your content kind of reminded me of that period of my life. Cheers 52268

  9. 905142 878352Youre so appropriate. Im there with you. Your blog is surely worth a read if anyone comes throughout it. Im lucky I did because now Ive obtained a entire new view of this. I didnt realise that this concern was so crucial and so universal. You absolutely put it in perspective for me. 491097

  10. 363161 128528Outstanding editorial! Would like took pleasure the particular following. Im hoping to learn to read a whole lot much more of you. Theres no doubt which you possess tremendous awareness and even imagination. I happen to be very highly fascinated utilizing this critical information. 182171

  11. 75629 258271Hi, you used to write outstanding posts, but the last several posts have been kinda boring I miss your fantastic posts. Past few posts are just a bit bit out of track! 443446

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *