Pa. homeowner won’t be charged in fatal shooting of armed intruder

Gun News


COLLEGEVILLE, Pa. (AP) — A Pennsylvania homeowner accused of fatally shooting an armed intruder will not face criminal charges, prosecutors said Thursday.

The unidentified shooter was justified because “all necessary elements were met” under the castle doctrine, Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin R. Steele said.

The Collegeville homeowner shot Robert Pollock, 55, of Schwenksville, after he broke into the man’s home close to midnight on Feb. 16, according to prosecutors.

The castle doctrine recently expanded Pennsylvanians’ right to use deadly force in their homes to include threatening situations outside their homes. It also eliminated a requirement that people try to retreat before using deadly force in such situations.

Pollock had forced open the front door and pointed a loaded revolver at the homeowner and a woman inside, The Philadelphia Inquirer reported.

“Fearing for his life and the lives of others in the residence,” the man shot Pollock multiple times with a gun he is permitted to carry, Steele said.

Pollock was pronounced dead at the scene and later determined to have been under the influence of alcohol and drugs. It remains unclear what the motive for the alleged break-in was.



Source link

Articles You May Like

U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham Leads Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans on Introducing Bill to Codify Second Amendment Rights for Law Abiding Citizens
Malta Republican brings ‘constitutional carry’ referendum
On guns, bipartisanship clears a very low hurdle in Virginia
Ted Nugent Flips Out: ‘Arrest The President’ Because Of Background Checks
Nebraska students demand more gun reform five years after national school walkouts

18 Comments

  1. 28752 825864Hello! I just want to make a enormous thumbs up with the wonderful info youve here during this post. We are returning to your weblog for additional soon. 651349

  2. 898380 467474It is actually a nice and useful piece of info. Im glad that you just shared this useful information with us. Please maintain us informed like this. Thanks for sharing. 301585

  3. 601396 450082I dont agree with this certain article. Even so, I did researched in Google and Ive discovered out that you are correct and I had been thinking inside the incorrect way. Continue producing quality material comparable to this. 964349

  4. 142123 688827Usually I dont read article on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up very compelled me to try and do so! Your writing style has been amazed me. Thanks, really excellent post. 437795

  5. 805778 113798Hello! I just now would like to supply a massive thumbs up for any amazing details you could have here within this post. We are coming back to your weblog post for further soon. 521918

  6. 872271 319635Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your blog and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I is going to be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access consistently quickly. 732946

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *