Court reinstates California ammunition purchase law

Second Amendment



SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — An appeals court has reinstated a California law requiring background checks for people buying ammunition, reversing a federal judge’s decision to stop the checks that he said violate the constitutional right to bear arms.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday granted the state attorney general’s request to stay the judge’s order.

“This means that the same restrictions that have been previously in effect regarding ammunition in California are back for the time being,” the National Rifle Association, which hailed the judge’s injunction, said in a news release.


The law, which took effect last July, requires Californians to pass an in-store background check before buying ammunition, which involves running buyers’ names through a California Department of Justice database that tracks legal purchases of guns.



Gun rights activists complained the law’s red tape and database errors unfairly limited legal purchases of ammunition.

U.S. District Judge Roger T. Benitez in San Diego ruled in their favor, saying the law “defies common sense while unduly and severely burdening the Second Amendment rights of every responsible, gun-owning citizen desiring to lawfully buy ammunition.”


While it is intended to keep ammunition from criminals, it blocked sales to legitimate, law-abiding buyers about 16% of the time, Benitez wrote. Moreover, he ruled that the state’s ban on importing ammunition from outside California violates federal interstate commerce laws.

Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a court filing earlier this month that the background checks stopped more than 750 people from buying bullets illegally from July 2019 through January 2020, not including those who didn’t even try because they knew they weren’t eligible.


The law requires buyers who already are in the state’s firearm background check database to pay a $1 fee each time they buy ammunition, while others can buy longer-term licenses if they do not have certain criminal convictions or mental health commitments.

It took an average of less than five minutes to complete the background checks, according to state court filings.



Source link

Articles You May Like

ILA | Trudeau’s Real Agenda: Ban Legal Firearm Ownership Altogether
Our authoritarian society: When an American political party needs an armed paramilitary wing to rule
Mass Shootings Plague the U.S. – The Spectator
Oregon Measure 114: Sheriffs, police chiefs tell judge their agencies are ‘unprepared’ to support gun permit program
Latest Oregon Measure 114 developments: What is the status of challenges to new gun limits?

9 Comments

  1. 222512 42285This internet web site may possibly be a walk-through its the data you wanted in regards to this and didnt know who should. Glimpse here, and youll absolutely discover it. 649514

  2. 413857 163745Great job on this post! I actually like how you presented your facts and how you created it fascinating and straightforward to understand. Thank you. 863077

  3. 934272 327137for however one more wonderful informative post, Im a loyal reader to this weblog and I cant stress enough how significantly valuable info Ive learned from reading your content. I genuinely appreciate all of the hard work you put into this great blog. 137683

  4. 401409 553181Id need to verify with you here. Which isnt something I often do! I enjoy studying a publish that can make people believe. Also, thanks for permitting me to remark! 877864

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *