The U.S. Supreme Court has once again punted on the question of gun rights, throwing out as moot a challenge to New York City’s strict gun regulations on transporting licensed guns outside the home.
New York City, in the name of public safety, has very strict gun regulations. It allows people to have a permit for guns in their homes, but those regulations originally barred people from transporting their guns anywhere except shooting ranges within the city. The New York State Rifle & Pistol Association challenged the regulation as a violation of the Second Amendment right to bear arms and lost in the lower courts.
But, after the Supreme Court agreed to review the case, New York state and New York City changed their laws to allow gun owners to transport their guns outside the city to shooting ranges, to competitions, and to second homes. That gave the challengers exactly what they asked for in their lawsuit, and so on Monday, the court, by a 6-to-3 vote, dismissed the case as moot–in short, it no longer presented a live controversy.
The unsigned opinion was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court’s four liberals, and Trump appointee Brett Kavanaugh.
But Kavanaugh wrote separately to stress that while he agreed with the majority on procedural grounds, he agreed with the dissenters–Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch–on one key issue.
Those three said that the lower courts were using the wrong test to evaluate gun laws, a test that is far too deferential to gun regulators. The dissenters mainly argued however, that the court essentially had been gamed on the mootness question, and that the justices should have decided the case, and decided it for the gun owners.
Gun-safety advocates breathed a sigh of relief that there was no decision adverse to gun regulations. But they worry that gains they are making in some state legislatures may be taken away by a conservative court majority.
“The reality is that the gun-safety movement is winning in state houses and at the ballot box, so the NRA is turning to the court to try to change the tide,” says Eric Tirschwell, managing mirector of Everytown for Gun Safety.
Monday’s decision was the first in a major gun case in 10 years, the first since a landmark set of decisions in 2008 and 2010. In those cases, a sharply divided court ruled that the Second Amendment right to bear arms is an individual right, not a right associated with the militia, as the court had previously implied. Those decisions marked a huge victory for the NRA and other gun-rights organizations.
In the decade following that decision, however, the court did not agree to hear any of the dozens of challenges to gun restrictions in cases appealed to the court. In part because the composition of the court made outcomes uncertain.
The previous big gun cases were decided by 5-to-4 votes, with Justice Anthony Kennedy casting the fifth and decisive vote. Kennedy, according to court sources, insisted, as the price of his vote, on adding limiting language that likely would have resulted in some, maybe even most, gun restrictions being upheld. With neither side of the court sure how Kennedy would vote on most regulations, neither the pro-gun, nor the pro-gun-control side wanted to risk an adverse ruling.
That changed when Kennedy retired in 2018 to be replaced by Justice Kavanaugh, who has a much more gun-friendly record than Kennedy did.
Nothing Kavanaugh said in his concurring opinion Monday would dissuade anyone from thinking he has changed his mind.
Bottom line here is that when it comes to gun control, there look to be four pretty solid votes against a lot of the measures enacted in recent years after mass shootings. Specifically, laws that bar carrying weapons in public places, and bans on assault weapons and large ammo magazines. All these, plus so called red-flag laws and other measures could be in jeopardy.
The question is where Chief Justice Roberts will be on these and other gun-control questions. To date, he has never been much of a supporter of gun-control laws, but he hasn’t been an outspoken opponent, either. All we really know is that he was part of the 2008 and 2010 majority that for the first time declared that the Second Amendment is an individual right, not, as the court had previously implied, a collective right that was attached to the colonial militia.
910118 986494Wonderful activity! 198961
7324 93004camping have been the very best activity that we can have during the summer, i adore to roast marshmallows on a campfire` 305756
600839 24846Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So nice to search out any individual with some original thoughts on this topic. realy thank you for starting this up. this internet site is one thing thats wanted on the web, somebody with a bit of originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet! 23147
826746 6036Some truly marvelous function on behalf with the owner of this internet internet site , dead great topic matter. 780572
428244 883161good day, your internet internet site is low-cost. I do several thanks for succeed 151617
849246 995182I was reading some of your content on this internet site and I conceive this internet website is really informative ! Keep on putting up. 255044
690989 628098I wish I had a dime for every bad article Ive read lately. I also wish other writers had your talent and style. Thank you. 140297
496703 478453Jeden Tag stellt man sich die Frage Was Koche Ich Heute?! Zerbrechen Sie sich nicht den Kopf, besuchen Sie uns am besten direkt auf unserer Webseite uns lassen Sie sich inspirieren 735353
182147 775614Very effectively written story. It will be valuable to anyone who usess it, including yours truly . Maintain up the very good function – canr wait to read more posts. 557239
813917 90474Thanks for helping out, outstanding data. 773306
582163 587641Extremely fascinating subject , regards for putting up. 86067
593949 409662I think this really is finest for you: Soccer, Football, Highlight, Live Streaming 574763
335879 952066I was wondering if you ever thought of changing the page layout of your site? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2 images. Maybe you could space it out better? 992622
704511 26417I came towards the exact conclusion as effectively some time ago. Fantastic write-up and I will probably be certain to appear back later for far more news. 963408
265569 692796I definitely did not realize that. Learnt something new proper now! Thanks for that. 812723
274513 800289Should you are viewing come up with alter in most of the living, starting point usually L . a . Weight reduction cutting down on calories platform are a wide stair as part of your attaining that most agenda. weight loss 91324