WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court sidestepped a major decision on gun rights Monday in a dispute over New York City’s former ban on transporting guns.
The justices threw out a challenge from gun rights groups, including the National Rifle Association’s New York affiliate. The court ruled that the city’s move to ease restrictions on taking licensed, locked and unloaded guns outside the city limits, coupled with a change in state law to prevent New York from reviving the ban, left the court with nothing to decide. The court asked a lower court to consider whether the city’s new rules still pose problems for gun owners.
The anticlimactic end to the Supreme Court case is a disappointment to gun rights advocates and relief to gun control groups who thought a conservative Supreme Court majority fortified by two appointees of President Donald Trump, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, might use the case to expand on landmark decisions from a decade ago that established a right under the Second Amendment to keep a gun at home for self-defense.
But other guns cases remain in the high court’s pipeline, including whether gun owners have a constitutional right to carry their weapons in public. Later Monday, the justices scheduled 10 cases involving gun restrictions in California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts and New Jersey, for possible discussion during their private telephone conference on Friday. The court could decide to hear one or more of those next term.
Although the opinion was unsigned, the court split 6-3 over the outcome.
Gorsuch joined Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas in dissenting from the dismissal. Kavanaugh wrote a brief concurring opinion in which he agreed with the result, but also said the court should take up another guns case soon.
“This case is not moot. The City violated petitioners’ Second Amendment right, and we should so hold,” Alito wrote for the dissenters.
Lower courts upheld the regulation, but the Supreme Court’s decision early in 2019 to step into the case signaled a revived interest in gun rights from a court with two new justices.
Officials at both the city and state level scrambled to find a way to remove the case from the justices’ grasp. Not only did the city change its regulation to allow licensed gun owners to transport their weapons to locations outside New York’s five boroughs, but the state enacted a law barring cities from imposing the challenged restrictions.
Those moves failed to get the court to dismiss the case before arguments in December, and gun control advocates worried that the court might adopt the reasoning Kavanaugh used in a 2011 opinion in his former job as a Court of Appeals judge. There, he wrote, gun laws “that are not longstanding or sufficiently rooted in text, history, and tradition are not consistent with the Second Amendment individual right.”
Restrictions on who can carry guns in public, limits on large-capacity ammunition magazines and perhaps even restrictions on gun ownership by convicted criminals, including people convicted of domestic violence, might be imperiled, gun control groups said.
Those groups breathed a sigh of relief Monday, while acknowledging that the legal fight would continue. “The Supreme Court declined the invitation to adopt the NRA’s extreme and dangerous interpretation of the Second Amendment,” said Eric Tirschwell, managing director of Everytown Law, the legal arm of former presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund.
But Jonathan Lowy, chief counsel and vice president of the Brady gun control group’s legal action project, said, “We know that this fight is not over. The gun lobby will continue to challenge gun laws across the country.”
Ilya Shapiro of the libertarian Cato Institute said the city “effectively hoodwinked the Supreme Court” by belatedly changing its rules to avoid the justices’ review. Shapiro called it “a moral imperative” for the court to take up a new case to explain its views on gun rights.
Kavanaugh made essentially the same point. He joined Alito in voicing concern that lower federal courts are not properly applying the court’s two big gun rights decisions.
“The Court should address that issue soon, perhaps in one of the several Second Amendment cases” pending at the Supreme Court, he wrote.
The court put off acting on appeals from gun owners in Massachusetts and New Jersey who claim the Constitution gives them the right to carry their weapons in public in challenges to strict licensing requirements.
Suggest a Correction
428126 951479Only a smiling visitant here to share the really like (:, btw wonderful style and style . 849086
699229 2189Fantastic post will be posting this on my weblog today keep up the excellent work. 336947
243253 896054Music began playing any time I opened this web site, so frustrating! 829845
281590 652918I believe other internet site proprietors should take this website as an model, very clean and wonderful user friendly style and style, as well as the content material. You are an expert in this subject! 922982
231762 978635I like what you guys are up also. Such intelligent work and reporting! Maintain up the superb works guys Ive incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I believe itll improve the value of my site . 660128
801112 576261Just what I was searching for, appreciate it for posting . 50098
313389 924157Spot on with this write-up, I really suppose this web web site needs rather a lot more consideration. most likely be once much more to learn significantly a lot more, thanks for that information. 392178
502794 291485Great paintings! This is the kind of information that ought to be shared around the web. Disgrace on Google for now not positioning this publish upper! Come on more than and talk over with my internet site . Thanks =) 34225
962420 555481for but one more fantastic informative post, Im a loyal reader to this weblog and I cant stress enough how much valuable information Ive learned from reading your content. I actually appreciate all of the hard function you put into this wonderful blog. 425836
928742 742328Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility beadlets for beagles that grow aerobically-fifth edition. 249607
101352 626267hi excellent page i will definaely come back and see once more. 669372
399160 390195I genuinely got into this article. I discovered it to be fascinating and loaded with distinctive points of interest. I like to read material that makes me feel. Thank you for writing this excellent content. 66466
113227 52588I like this site very a lot so much outstanding info. 993380
209530 15583Sounds like some thing plenty of baby boomers really should study. The feelings of neglect are there in a lot of levels when a single is over the hill. 716467
868670 45935Wow Da weiss man, wo es hingehen muss Viele Grsse Mirta 776486
15044 190675I gotta bookmark this site it seems really valuable very beneficial 122260
860249 831820You ought to consider starting an e-mail list. It would take your internet site to its potential. 162335