Last week, Judge Douglas P. Woodlock of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction that allows gun stores to resume operation in the Bay State as long as they adhere to a set of social distancing guidelines. The ruling is an important victory in the fight to protect Second Amendment rights during the ongoing COVID-19 crisis.
On March 23, Governor Charlie Baker issued COVID-19 Order No. 13, which required the closure of all businesses not deemed “essential.” The order did not designate gun stores as “essential” businesses.
On March 28, the Trump administration updated the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (“CISA”) guidance on the critical infrastructure that should remain open during state shutdown orders due to COVID-19. The guidance identified “Workers supporting the operation of firearm or ammunition product manufacturers, retailers, importers, distributors, and shooting ranges” as critical infrastructure.
Following the federal government’s determination, on March 31, Baker issued COVID-19 Order No. 21. Complying with the DHS guidelines, the order designated firearms retailers as “essential” businesses.
However, later that same day the Baker administration removed firearm retailers and shooting ranges from the list of essential businesses. This reversal was cheered by Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, who declared to her Twitter followers, “Gun shops and shooting ranges are NOT essential businesses during a public health emergency.”
On April 9, a group of Massachusetts gun stores filed suit to halt Baker’s gun store closure on Second Amendment grounds. Later that month, NRA and its state affiliate Gun Owners’ Action League filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs.
In the amicus brief, NRA made clear that Baker’s orders were an impermissible violation of the Second Amendment. The brief pointed out that in the landmark case District of Columbia v. Heller the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a total ban on the acquisition of a single class of firearm – handguns. Baker’s order effectively prohibited the acquisition of all classes of firearms in Massachusetts and therefore are illegal under Supreme Court precedent.
Further, the brief noted that Baker’s order was impermissible under First Circuit precedent. In the 2018 case Gould v. Morgan, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit adopted a controversial two-step analysis for Second Amendment cases. First the court must determine “whether the challenged law burdens conduct that falls within the scope of the Second Amendment’s guarantee.” If the measure does implicate the Second Amendment right then the court is tasked with determining what level of scrutiny to apply to the measure and whether the law is permissible under that level of scrutiny.
In Gould, the First Circuit “identified the core of the Second Amendment right as ‘the possession of operative firearms for use in defense of the home’ by responsible, law-abiding individuals.” As Baker’s order foreclosed the ability to acquire firearms for this purpose, the order struck at the core of the Second Amendment right.
The First Circuit also made clear in Gould that “A law or policy that burdens conduct falling within the core of the Second Amendment requires a correspondingly strict level of scrutiny.” Therefore analysis of the Baker orders demands strict scrutiny.
Strict scrutiny requires that the Government prove the restriction furthers a compelling interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. A closure of all firearms-related businesses is not narrowly tailored. Moreover, the state cannot demonstrate that a blanket closure of firearm retailers will directly or materially alleviate the harms posed by COVID-19 considering the plaintiffs challenging the order stated that they would abide by all social distancing and workforce requirements for the operation of essential businesses.
Woodlock’s order underscores the excessive nature of Baker’s actions, as the standard for obtaining a preliminary injunction is rigorous. A plaintiff must show that they are likely to succeed on the merits of the case, show that there is irreparable harm without the injunction, demonstrate that the balance of equities is in their favor, and establish that the injunction is in the public interest. In granting the preliminary injunction, Judge Woodlock made clear that Baker’s orders are likely unconstitutional, cause irreparable harm to Bay Staters’ rights, and that this attack on Second Amendment rights was against the public interest.
According to Reuters, Baker told the press that his office will review Woodlock’s order and stated, “[w]e will certainly comply with any kind of judicial ruling on anything.” Sincere compliance with a lawful court order would mark a welcome change in the Baker administration. In late 2018, the Baker administration declared its intent to defy court orders issued by the state’s courts pertaining to the issuance of firearms licenses before backing down in early 2019.
76759 114424Merely wanna input on few general items, The website style is perfect, the topic material is rattling superb : D. 939996
591305 724543I discovered your weblog site internet internet site on the internet and appearance some of your early posts. Continue to maintain within the excellent operate. I just now additional increase your Rss to my MSN News Reader. Seeking toward reading far much more from you obtaining out at a later date! 608445
902410 702733Nice post. I be taught 1 thing far more challenging on entirely different blogs everyday. It will all of the time be stimulating to learn content from other writers and apply slightly 1 thing from their store. Id desire to use some with the content on my blog whether you dont mind. Natually Ill give you a hyperlink on your net weblog. Thanks for sharing. 564077
935150 986112I believe this internet site contains some very fantastic information for everyone : D. 55801
544857 726251Do you have a spam problem on this blog; I also am a blogger, and I was curious about your situation; we have developed some nice practices and we are looking to swap methods with other folks, be sure to shoot me an e-mail if interested. 733851
439392 481483We will give deal reviews, deal coaching, and follow up to ensure you win the deals you cant afford to lose. 930171
974976 717090I used to be recommended this web website by my cousin. Im no longer certain whether this put up is written via him as nobody else know such exact approximately my dilemma. You are wonderful! Thank you! 288691
136085 278132I came across this great from you out of sheer luck and never think lucky enough to say also credit you for any job nicely done. 142276
980014 111391Keep up the wonderful work , I read few blog posts on this web site and I believe that your web site is real intriguing and has bands of very good info . 308754
48848 890406This sort of in search of get the enhancements made on this special lifestyle and diet, begin your L . a . Shifting the pounds diet remedy can be a huge procedure into accesing which usually hope. weight loss 76248
833473 104021Hello! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I came to look it over. Im definitely enjoying the info. Im book-marking and will probably be tweeting this to my followers! Outstanding weblog and superb style and style. 439709
177046 457960I as properly conceive so , perfectly indited post! . 756595
310828 508890cleaning supplies should have earth friendly organic ingredients so that they do not harm the environment 977410
599596 682956Hi. Thank you for producing this site . I m working on betting online niche and have discovered this web site making use of search on bing . Will be positive to look more of your content material . Gracias , see ya. :S 988686