Florida Supreme Court shoots down assault weapons ban

Second Amendment

click to enlarge

The Florida Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a proposed constitutional amendment seeking to ban possession of assault-style weapons does not meet requirements to go before voters.

Supporters of the Ban Assault Weapons NOW initiative did not submit enough petition signatures to make it on the 2020 ballot but needed support from the Supreme Court to go before voters in 2022. The group began the initiative after 17 people were killed in the 2018 mass shooting at Parkland’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

Attorney General Ashley Moody, the National Rifle Association and the National Shooting Sports Foundation opposed the measure at the Supreme Court, while national gun-control groups such as Brady and several South Florida cities backed the proposal.

The Supreme Court plays a key role in the ballot-initiative process. It reviews initiatives to determine whether ballot titles and summaries —- the wording that voters would see at polling places —- meet legal requirements. It does not decide on the merits of the initiatives.

Thursday’s 4-1 decision focused on part of the ballot summary that said the initiative “exempts and requires registration of assault weapons lawfully possessed prior to this provision’s effective date.”


The court majority, made up of Chief Justice Charles Canady and justices Ricky Polston, Alan Lawson and Carlos Muniz, said that provision “affirmatively misleads voters regarding the exemption” because of a contradiction with the broader text of the proposed constitutional amendment.

The contradiction involves whether the exemption would apply to weapons or to the people who possess the weapons. The distinction could be important, for instance, if a gun owner dies.

“Specifically, the next to last sentence of the ballot summary informs voters that the initiative ‘exempts and requires registration of assault weapons lawfully possessed prior to this provision’s effective date’ … when in fact the initiative does no such thing,” the majority opinion said. “Contrary to the ballot summary, the initiative’s text exempts only ‘the person’s,’ meaning the current owner’s, possession of that assault weapon.”

The proposal “does not categorically exempt the assault weapon, only the current owner’s possession of that assault weapon,” the majority added.

The four justices rejected arguments by the measure’s supporters that voters would understand that owners’ possession of the firearms, and not the weapon, would be exempt.

During oral arguments in February, Jon Mills, an attorney for Ban Assault Weapons NOW, said the exemption would apply to people who have the guns.

He said “possession is the continual issue. It does not make sense to say that a weapon lawfully possessed itself.”

But the ballot proposal “misleads voters to believe that any lawfully possessed assault weapons will continue to remain lawful,” the majority wrote.

“As the opponents argue, if an individual registers and attests to lawful possession of an assault weapon, and then lends, gifts, or leaves in a will that assault weapon to a family member or friend, then that family member or friend would be in criminal violation of the initiative —- a felony offense,” Thursday’s ruling said.

But Justice Jorge Labarga disagreed with the majority, writing in a dissent that “the ballot summary clearly summarizes the content of the proposed amendment.”

The language objected to by the majority “is not affirmatively misleading,” Labarga wrote.

“In fact, the language is accurate, and the majority simply concludes that the language is insufficiently narrow,” he added. “The ballot title and summary provide fair notice and equip voters to educate themselves about the details of the initiative. Consequently, the initiative should be placed on the ballot.”

Labarga is the lone justice remaining on the court who was part of a more liberal-leaning bloc of jurists that controlled the court for years. After reaching a mandatory retirement age, justices Barbara Pariente, R. Fred Lewis and Peggy Quince were forced to step down as Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis took office in January 2019 Since then, DeSantis, a Harvard Law School graduate, has cemented a conservative majority on the court by appointing justices who share his ideology.

The Ban Assault Weapons NOW initiative emerged in the aftermath of the Feb. 14, 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Nikolas Cruz, who was 19 at the time of the shooting, is accused of using a semi-automatic weapon to gun down 14 students and three faculty members at his former school.

Gail Schwartz, the chairwoman of the political committee behind the proposal, is the aunt of Alex Schachter, who was among the students slain during the school shooting.

“The Supreme Court, now controlled by the NRA in the same way as our governor and our Legislature, has fundamentally failed the people of Florida,” Schwartz said in a prepared statement Thursday.

The court’s rejection of the amendment “does not change our commitment to rid Florida of these killing machines,” she added.

“After striving for two years for a safer state for our families, we’re just getting started,” Schwartz said.

But George Levesque, an attorney for the NRA, praised the Supreme Court decision.

“I think it is a huge victory for those who enjoy their 2nd Amendment rights,” Levesque sad. “But it is also a victory for the people of Florida, in terms of making sure that when they are asked to amend their Constitution, they are going to get an accurate description of what the amendment does.”

– News Service Assignment Manager Tom Urban contributed to this report.

Please follow CDC guidelines and Orange County advisories to stay safe, and please support this free publication. Our small but mighty team is working tirelessly to bring you news on how coronavirus is affecting Central Florida. Please consider making a one-time or monthly donation. Every little bit helps.

Source link


  1. 844107 56154I like the valuable information you provide within your articles. Ill bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. Im quite certain Ill learn numerous new stuff correct here! Great luck for the next! 281873

  2. 131080 48853This web page is often a walk-through its the internet you wanted about this and didnt know who to question. Glimpse here, and youll absolutely discover it. 652003

  3. 473977 843090Hello! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I came to appear it over. Im undoubtedly enjoying the data. Im book-marking and is going to be tweeting this to my followers! Outstanding blog and superb style and design. 473247

  4. 849843 541491Hey there. I want to to ask slightly somethingis this a wordpress internet log as we are planning to be transferring over to WP. In addition did you make this template all by yourself? Several thanks. 345566

  5. 242938 792265I believe other internet site owners should take this web site as an model, very clean and wonderful user pleasant pattern . 852890

  6. 473063 920329There some fascinating points in time in this post but I dont know if I see these center to heart. There might be some validity but Ill take hold opinion until I explore it further. Outstanding write-up , thanks and then we want a good deal much more! Put into FeedBurner too 290605

  7. 249773 109691Oh my goodness! a great post dude. Several thanks Nonetheless We are experiencing issue with ur rss . Dont know why Can not sign up to it. Could there be anybody obtaining identical rss difficulty? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx 807834

  8. 661179 81813I usually cant find it in me to care enough to leaves a comment for articles on the internet but this was really pretty very good, thanks and maintain it up, Ill check back again 679956

  9. 155422 126644After study several of the weblog articles for your internet internet site now, and i also genuinely such as your strategy for blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark internet site list and are checking back soon. Pls take a look at my web page in addition and tell me what you believe. 845647

  10. 527498 837304I genuinely enjoy your web site, but Im having a issue: any time I load 1 of your post in Firefox, the center with the web page is screwed up – which is bizarre. May possibly I send you a screenshot? In any event, maintain up the superior work; I surely like reading you. 761708

  11. 19444 398238I discovered your blog internet site on google and appearance a couple of of your early posts. Keep up the outstanding operate. I just extra the RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Searching for forward to reading far more on your part later on! 313760

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *