|DATE:||June 6, 2020|
|TO:||USF & NRA Members and Friends|
|FROM:||Marion P. Hammer|
|USF Executive Director|
|NRA Past President|
By now you’ve heard of the great victory for Florida’s law-abiding gun owners: the Florida Supreme Court agreed with our contention that the ballot summary of the “Assault Weapons” ban initiative was deceptive and would mislead voters.
The ballot initiative contained deceptive language to fool Florida voters in an attempt to ban millions of legal, commonly used firearms and shut down legitimate businesses all around Florida.
Supporters of the gun ban initiative used deceptive language to try to trick voters into supporting their gun ban claiming it would do one thing while knowing it would do much more. To read the Opinion Click Here: Florida Supreme Court Opinion
The media has been all over the board in reporting the opinion. Below are some of the clippings including the hate filled EDITORIALS by some of the anti-gun media.
by Jeffrey Schweers, USA TODAY NETWORK-Florida Capital Bureau
June 4, 2020 | 1:30 pm ET
“That’s a great victory for Florida’s law-abiding gun owners,” said Marion Hammer, a longtime gun-rights lobbyist who has represented the NRA before the Florida Legislature. “Supporters of the initiative used deceptive language to try to trick voters into believing it would have done one thing, while in fact it would have done much more.”
Saying its ballot summary is misleading to voters, the Florida Supreme Court has rejected a constitutional amendment banning assault weapons from the November 2022 statewide ballot.
“This misleading language violates” Florida law that requires clear and unambiguous language, the court said in its 9-page advisory opinion issued Thursday.
Jorge Labarga, the only dissenter among the court’s current five justices, disagreed: “The ballot title clearly communicates the chief purpose of the Initiative, and the ballot summary clearly summarizes the content of the proposed amendment.”
Attorney General Ashley Moody sought the court’s opinion almost a year ago, on July 26, on whether the initiative by the group Ban Assault Weapons Now met the tests for placing a constitutional amendment on the ballot.
The crux of the argument was if the language exempted a legally registered assault rifle, or just its owner, and whether such a weapon would be banned once it changed ownership.
The National Rifle Association and National Shooting Sports Foundation submitted briefs along with Moody opposing the initiative...READ MORE HERE: https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/local/state/2020/06/04/florida-supreme-court-rejects-assault-weapons-ban-amendment/3143781001/
“At the end of the day, it was a good win for folks who support the Second Amendment, but it was also a good win for the people of Florida, that they are only going to be voting on amendments that are not misleading,” counsel to the National Rifle Association said.
By Raychel Lean
June 5, 2020 | 12:57 pm
A citizen’s initiative that would have asked Florida voters to ban assault weapons in 2022 has stumbled before the state Supreme Court, which found the question and its accompanying summary was too misleading to make it to the ballot.
The ruling is good news for the National Rifle Association and National Sports Shooting Foundation, which opposed the idea.
If voters had approved the amendment, it would have edited the right to bear arms under the Florida Constitution, making it a third-degree felony to possess an automatic weapon—any semi-automatic rifle or shotgun with more than 10 rounds of ammunition.
But the appellate panel majority couldn’t get past the next-to-last sentence, which said the proposal “exempts and requires registration of assault weapons lawfully possessed prior to this provision’s effective date.”
That language was misleading, the opinion said, because it implied that any assault weapons purchased and registered before a certain date would be exempt, while the amendment text, on the other hand, explained that owners couldn’t sell or transfer the weapon to anyone else.
“While the ballot summary purports to exempt registered assault weapons lawfully possessed prior to the Initiative’s effective date, the Initiative does not categorically exempt the assault weapon, only the current owner’s possession of that assault weapon,” the opinion said.
The majority found that butted heads with Florida Statute 101.161(1), which says ballot language has to be clear and unambiguous…
READ MORE HERE…https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/2020/06/05/good-news-for-the-nra-florida-supreme-court-strikes-question-on-assault-weapons-ban-from-ballot/?slreturn=20200505150504
Florida Supreme Court Blocks Assault Weapon Ban From Ballot
The Florida Supreme Court is blocking an assault weapons ban from going to voters in 2022.
By BRENDAN FARRINGTON
June 4, 2020 | 2:46 pm
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — The Florida Supreme Court is blocking an assault weapons ban from going to voters in 2022, saying in a Thursday ruling that the ballot summary is deceptive because it doesn’t clearly state that a grandfathering clause applies to the owner, not the gun itself.
A group called Ban Assault Weapons Now sponsored the proposed constitutional amendment, inspired by the mass shooting at a Parkland high school that left 17 people dead. It would have banned the possession of any semiautomatic rifle or shotgun capable of holding more than ten rounds of ammunition.
The amendment language would have made an exception for anyone who already lawfully owned an assault weapon as long as they registered it with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.
But the court in a 4-1 opinion said the ballot summary was misleading because it said weapons lawfully possessed before the initiative was passed would be exempted.
The court ruled that voters would be deceived because the initiative wouldn’t have protected the weapon itself, but rather the person who lawfully owned it. In other words, people who legally owned a weapon wouldn’t be able to sell it or give it to someone else…READ MORE HERE: https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2020-06-04/florida-supreme-court-blocks-assault-weapon-ban-from-ballot
By Sun Sentinel Editorial Board
South Florida Sun Sentinel |
Jun 04, 2020 | 4:50 PM
It’s not just criminals who get no sympathy from the Florida Supreme Court. There’s none for law-abiding citizens, either. Not when the choice is between public safety and the morbid absolutism of the National Rifle Association.
By a 4-1 vote Thursday, the court’s far-right bloc disapproved an assault weapons ban proposed for the 2022 ballot. Not only did the gun lobby ask the justices to reject the citizen’s petition drive, so did Attorney General Ashley Moody. She’s supposed to be the people’s lawyer, but she is arm-in-arm with gun manufacturers and others who believe the Second Amendment allows no limits on personal ownership of weapons of mass destruction. READ MORE HERE: https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/editorials/fl-op-edit-assault-weapons-supreme-court-20200604-i3csgansdzflhp4sjnvobitvme-story.html
By BEN FRIEDMAN
June 5, 2020 | 12:17 pm
When her nephew Alex Schachter was murdered with an assault weapon at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in February 2018, Gail Schwartz was devastated — and then activated. Frustrated by the government inaction on gun violence, Gail founded the Ban Assault Weapons Now (BAWN) movement, which aimed to pass a constitutional amendment to, you guessed it, ban assault weapons in Florida.
Two years, nearly 200,000 petitions and many more volunteer hours later, the BAWN amendment was disqualified by the Supreme Court of Florida. The reason? The judges determined the language explaining the amendment was too confusing for we simpleminded voters to understand.
As a certain future president might say: Malarky! This ruling is the latest in a troubling national pattern, thanks to a new crop of ultraconservative judges who have taken hold of our judiciary. These judges are often products of the Federalist Society, an organization that claims to support an independent, originalist judiciary, but in reality just promotes hard right-wing partisan ideologues. Unfortunately for us, this new Florida Supreme Court majority is seemingly hellbent on cementing its status as the poster child for that movement…READ MORE HERE…https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/guest-commentary/os-op-florida-supreme-court-assault-weapons-ban-20200605-tgdcfigkyjc6pp73rvvw5pvweq-story.html
By JAKE DIMA, CONTRIBUTOR
June 5, 2020 | 2:32 pm ET
The Florida Supreme Court on Thursday struck down an amendment that would ban the ownership of assault weapons due to misleading wording. Ban Assault Weapons Now, which prohibited the “possession of assault weapons,” banned magazines holding more than 10 rounds and mandated registration for these guns, was set to appear on the 2022 ballot. However, justices voted 4-1 to ensure this doesn’t happen, according to the Washington Examiner.
Justices called the initiative — developed after the deadly Parkland, Florida, high school shooting in February 2018 — “affirmatively misleading,” as it does “not categorically exempt the assault weapon, only the current owner’s possession of that assault weapon,” according to court documents obtained by ABC News…READ MORE HERE …https://dailycaller.com/2020/06/05/florida-supreme-court-assault-weapons/
June 4, 2020 | 7:00 pm
by Cam Edwards
A proposed ban on so-called assault weapons will not appear on the 2022 ballot in Florida, after the state supreme court issued a 4-1 decision stating that the language of the ballot initiative doesn’t meet the legal requirements to appear before voters. Organizers for the ban originally hoped to get the ballot before voters this fall, but failed to get enough signatures from Florida residents to qualify this year. The anti-gun campaigners then set their sights on the 2022 election, but the National Rifle Association, the National Shooting Sports Foundation, and Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody questioned the language in the initiative, and on Thursday a majority of justices on the court found that wording used by gun control advocates was indeed misleading to voters…READ MORE HERE:
By John Haughey
The Center Square
June 4, 2020
The Florida Supreme Court on Thursday knocked a proposed constitutional amendment to ban possession of “assault-style weapons” from a prospective berth on the 2022 ballot.
In a 4-1 decision, the court ruled Ban Assault Weapons NOW’s 75-word ballot summary “affirmatively misleads voters” by contradicting broader text in the proposed amendment.
“Specifically, the next-to-last sentence of the ballot summary informs voters the initiative ‘exempts and requires registration of assault weapons lawfully possessed prior to this provision’s effective date’ when, in fact, the initiative does no such thing,” the majority opinion said. “Contrary to the ballot summary, the initiative’s text exempts only ‘the person’s,’ meaning the current owner’s, possession of that assault weapon.”
Chief Justice Charles Canady and justices Ricky Polston, Alan Lawson and Carlos Muniz formed the majority. Justice Jorge Labarga was the lone dissenter.
Ban Assault Weapons NOW (BAWN) began its petition drive in the wake of the Valentine’s Day 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland.… READ MORE HERE: https://www.thecentersquare.com/florida/florida-supreme-court-rules-against-assault-weapons-ban-amendment/article_30ee3e46-a6bf-11ea-9091-c7949beed402.html
By TOM URBAN, WLRN
WUSF Public Media
June 4, 2020
The Florida Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a proposed constitutional amendment seeking to ban the possession of assault-style weapons does not meet requirements to be placed on the ballot in Florida.
Supporters of the Ban Assault Weapons Now initiative did not submit enough petition signatures to make it on the 2020 ballot but needed support from the Supreme Court to go before voters in 2022.
Attorney General Ashley Moody, the National Rifle Association and the National Shooting Sports Foundation submitted briefs to the court in opposition to the measure, while gun-control groups such as Brady and several South Florida cities backed the proposal…READ MORE HERE: https://wusfnews.wusf.usf.edu/post/florida-supreme-court-nixes-effort-ban-assault-weapons
by Dara Kam
News Service of Florida
June 4, 2020
TALLAHASSEE, Fla.— The Florida Supreme Court ruled Thursday that a proposed constitutional amendment seeking to ban possession of assault-style weapons does not meet requirements to go before voters.
Supporters of the Ban Assault Weapons NOW initiative did not submit enough petition signatures to make it on the 2020 ballot but needed support from the Supreme Court to go before voters in 2022. The group began the initiative after 17 people were killed in the 2018 mass shooting at Parkland’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
Attorney General Ashley Moody, the National Rifle Association and the National Shooting Sports Foundation opposed the measure at the Supreme Court, while national gun-control groups such as Brady and several South Florida cities backed the proposal.
The Supreme Court plays a key role in the ballot-initiative process. It reviews initiatives to determine whether ballot titles and summaries — the wording that voters would see at polling places — meet legal requirements. It does not decide on the merits of the initiatives…READ MORE HERE: https://cbs12.com/news/local/court-shoots-down-assault-weapons-ban
20395 789865As soon as I located this web web site I went on reddit to share some with the love with them. 511731
785717 251817How a lot of an appealing guide, keep on making far better half 80541
892291 444726Hiya! awesome blog! I happen to be a day-to-day visitor to your website (somewhat far more like addict ) of this website. Just wanted to say I appreciate your blogs and am seeking forward for far more to come! 95297
842744 839205Wow, incredible weblog structure! How long have you been running a weblog for? you produced running a blog look easy. The entire appear of your web site is magnificent, neatly as the content material! 333244
623615 807210Awesome inkling Grace! ego was luxurious youd bring about this about your biz bump into upstanding lineage. We reason you! 917357
960546 142942quite good goodthis post deserves almost nothing hahaha merely joking: S nice write-up: P 146611
356084 328475Thank you, Ive just been searching for information about this topic for a whilst and yours will be the greatest Ive discovered till now. But, what in regards to the conclusion? Are you confident concerning the supply? 944116
820634 856336Superb post but I was wanting to know in the event you could write a litte much more on this topic? Id be quite thankful in case you could elaborate just a little bit a lot more. Thanks! 16696
968988 363856This internet web site is my breathing in, actually excellent layout and perfect content material . 255238
73017 447591The electronic cigarette uses a battery and a small heating factor the vaporize the e-liquid. This vapor can then be inhaled and exhaled 891127
884751 849129i just didnt need to have a kindle at very first, but when receiving 1 for christmas im utterly converted. It supply genuine advantages over a book, and makes it such a great deal additional convenient. i may well undoubtedly advocate this item: 820809
430847 632079Spot on with this write-up, I really suppose this internet website needs rather more consideration. most likely be once much more to learn much a lot more, thanks for that information. 9606
797697 39719you use a amazing weblog here! do you require to make some invite posts on my blog? 138265
132549 340246of course like your web-site even so you want to check the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Numerous them are rife with spelling issues and I to locate it extremely bothersome to inform the reality even so Ill surely come back once more. 966898