ILA | Supreme Court’s Inaction Frustrates Second Amendment Supporters, Emboldens Anti-gun Activists

Gun News


Gun owners are by now used to being disappointed with the U.S. Supreme Court’s refusal to uphold their rights or even to defend its own Second Amendment precedents. But the court’s neglect reached a new low last Monday, with its sweeping decision to deny review of the many Second Amendment cases pending on its docket.

At issue were 10 petitions that offered the court opportunities to clarify the most important and contentious issues in the modern Second Amendment landscape, controversies that in some cases have led to radically different approaches by public officials and the lower courts.

The high court, however, passed on all of them. The Supreme Court’s most recent “punt” prompted outrage not only from pro-gun activists, but by members of the court itself who remain committed to upholding Second Amendment rights.

Justice Clarence Thomas, who has long criticized his colleagues’ neglect of the Second Amendment, chose the NRA-backed case of Rogers v. Grewal to renew his objections to what he characterized as “the Court simply look[ing] the other way” on infringements of the right to keep and bear arms.

The Rogers petition asked the Supreme Court to review a decision from the Third Circuit that upheld New Jersey’s “may-issue” concealed carry regime, effectively allowing New Jersey officials to deny ordinary citizens the right to bear arms in public for self-defense.

In a 19-page dissent from the court’s refusal to hear the case, Thomas argued that the court should have granted review, that the Second Amendment protects a right to bear arms in public for self-defense, and that New Jersey’s “may-issue” regime violates that right. Trump appointee Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined Thomas in dissent.  

Thomas wrote that “many courts have resisted our decisions in Heller and McDonald” by ignoring its analytical approach and substituting a “made up” test with no basis in the Second Amendment or the Supreme Court’s precedents on that provision. Moreover, he stated, the lower courts’ application of that test “has yielded analyses that are entirely inconsistent with Heller,” which “cautioned that ‘[a] constitutional guarantee subject to future judges’ assessments of its usefulness is no constitutional guarantee at all’”.

“[W]e explicitly rejected the invitation to evaluate Second Amendment challenges under an ‘interest-balancing inquiry, with the interests protected by the Second Amendment on one side and the governmental public-safety concerns on the other,’” Thomas reminded the court. “But the application of the test adopted by the courts of appeals has devolved into just that,” he said.

While bystanders can only speculate on the reason the court continues to “look the other way” on the Second Amendment, at least two clear implications for gun owners emerge from this latest development.

One, they must continue to support President Trump’s unprecedented efforts to seat fearless and unapologetic constitutionalists to all levels of the federal courts.

Second, they must redouble their activism in the political sphere to ensure that if the courts too often won’t respect their rights, their elected officials will.

As always, your NRA will be at the forefront of these and other efforts to protect the right to keep and bear arms.



Source link

Articles You May Like

Biden and Democrats use ‘assault weapons ban’ to position for 2024
Buffalo gunman pleads guilty in racist supermarket massacre that killed 10
Biden Targets Anyone Who Has Ever Bought a Semiautomatic Weapon: ‘No Social Redeeming Value’
Liberals’ mandatory gun buyback is another boondoggle to come
GOP’s Jim Durkin, my husband, is an endangered species

11 Comments

  1. 273191 560562OK very first take a excellent look at your self. What do you like what do you not like so considerably. Function on that which you do not like. But do not listen to other folks their opinions do not matter only yours does. Work on having the attitude that this really is who you are and if they dont like it they can go to hell. 717068

  2. 287723 950379I quite delighted to discover this web website on bing, just what I was seeking for : D besides saved to bookmarks . 677

  3. 345348 574544Up to now, you call for to term of hire an absolute truck or van and will also be removal equipments to valuable items plus take a look at the new destination. From the long run, which finish up with are couple of points except anxiety moreover stress and anxiety. removals stockport 166293

  4. 350725 873175I genuinely dont accept this specific post. Nonetheless, I had searched with Google and Ive discovered out that you are correct and I had been thinking in the improper way. Keep on creating top quality material related to this. 288416

  5. 992307 324291hi!,I like your writing so significantly! share we maintain up a correspondence extra approximately your post on AOL? I demand a specialist on this space to solve my problem. May possibly be that is you! Looking ahead to peer you. 836858

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *