Top Gun-Control Group Will Spend $1.25 Million in Colorado After Affiliate Received PPP Loan

Gun News

One of the country’s leading gun-control groups received up to $350,000 from taxpayers to deal with the fallout from coronavirus, but that has not affected its political arm’s plans to spend millions on the 2020 election.

Giffords PAC, one of the largest gun-control political action committees in the country, told Colorado Politics that it would spend $1.25 million on television ads to support Democrat John Hickenlooper’s  2020 Colorado Senate campaign. The announcement came just two months after the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence took a Paycheck Protection Program loan worth between $150,000 and $350,000 in order to meet payroll for 16 employees, according to the Small Business Administration.

Congress established PPP loans in March to provide relief to small businesses affected by coronavirus shutdowns, but the taxpayer-backed loans may have been used to support the salaries of workers spearheading Giffords PAC’s multimillion-dollar campaign operations. A Washington Free Beacon review of financial disclosures found money has moved between the PAC, Law Center, and a Washington, D.C.-based social welfare arm called Giffords. The PAC has paid Giffords more than $845,000 since March 2019 for everything from staffing costs to rentals. Giffords and the Law Center share staff, according to federal disclosures.

Neither the Giffords PAC nor the Law Center responded to a request for comment.

While advocacy groups routinely commingle money between nonprofit and political operations, the use of taxpayer money could lead to legal trouble, according to some legal experts. Hans A. von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, warned that the arrangement could prove legally problematic if any of the PPP funds were used to support Hickenlooper.

“To the extent this organization commingles or uses any federal funds in support of a member of Congress because of his anti-gun position, they may be in violation of [federal law],” Spakovsky said. “If they use federal funds for partisan political purposes they could potentially be charged with ‘defrauding’ the United States.”

Second Amendment activist Alan Gottlieb said the two nonprofits he works with have struggled from lagging donations during the pandemic, but the notion of taking taxpayer dollars did not cross his mind. He called on the Giffords Law Center to return its PPP loans and said politicians should repudiate endorsements from the group.

“This is yet another fraud committed by the Giffords PAC against the American people,” Gottlieb told the Free Beacon. “They should use that money to repay the loans they took for their allied sister organization that they claim is not political. Morally this is disgusting and Hickenlooper should denounce them for it.”

The Hickenlooper campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

Brady PAC, another leading gun-control group whose affiliate took up to $1 million from the small business relief program, also told the Colorado publication it would “spend big” in support of Hickenlooper. The PAC did not respond to questions about how much it planned to spend in the race. A spokesman for the Brady Center, which received the PPP loan, told the Free Beacon on Friday the loan was needed to make up for shortfalls in fundraising associated with events canceled due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Stephen Gutowski is a staff writer for the Washington Free Beacon. He founded his own site as a junior in college and has been writing about news and politics since that time. His email address is His twitter handle is @StephenGutowski.

Source link


  1. 28914 536600Wow that was strange. I just wrote an extremely long comment but soon after I clicked submit my comment didnt appear. Grrrr nicely Im not writing all that more than again. Regardless, just wanted to say great blog! 853544

  2. 842501 260102Wow, amazing weblog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging appear easy. The overall appear of your internet internet site is wonderful, let alone the content! 24588

  3. 895198 210842Hello. Neat post. There is an concern together with your website in firefox, and you might want to test this The browser could be the market chief and a big part of other men and women will miss your great writing because of this issue. 54043

  4. 459753 466406In case you are viewing come up with alter in most with the living, starting point generally L . a . Weight reduction cutting down on calories platform are a wide stair as part of your attaining that most agenda. weight loss 811079

  5. 98126 408609Private Krankenversicherung – Nur dann, wenn Sie sich fr die Absicherung ber die Rentenversicherung entschieden haben, dann knnen Sie sich sicher sein, dass Sie im Alter so viel Geld haben, damit Sie Ihren Lebensstandard halten knnen. 26486

  6. 399208 693768This sort of considering develop change in an individuals llife, building our Chicago Pounds reduction going on a diet model are a wide actions toward generating the fact goal in mind. lose weight 335084

  7. 458495 794742Thanks for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our region library but I think I learned a lot more from this post. Im really glad to see such fantastic info being shared freely out there. 808297

  8. 773075 882760Finally, got what I was seeking for!! Ive actually enjoying every small bit of this. Ecstatic I stumbled into this post! and also Ive bookmarked to look at special info for your weblog post. 565705

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *