Trump and Bush Appointees On Ninth Circuit Rule That CA Ban On High-Capacity Magazines Is Unconstitutional

Second Amendment

[ad_1]

In a victory for the gun lobby, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has invalidated California’s law limiting gun magazines to 10 bullets, saying that the law violates the Second Amendment.

In a ruling published today in the case known as Duncan v. Becerra, Circuit Judge Kenneth Lee acknowledges the scourge of gun violence and mass shootings in this country, but he writes, “Even well-intentioned laws must pass constitutional muster.” And he adds that banning high-capacity magazines “strikes at the core of the Second Amendment — the right to armed self-defense.”

Lee is a 2019 appointee to the court, nominated by President Trump. Joining him in the 2-1 decision was Judge Consuelo Callahan, who was nominated to the court by George W. Bush.

A dissenting opinion came from U.S. District Court Judge Barbara Lynn of Texas, who was named to the three-judge appellate panel. Judge Lynn cited the earlier Ninth Circuit precedent of Fyock v. City of Sunnyvale (2015), which held that bans on high-capacity magazines don’t conflict with the Second Amendment. Judge Lynn also cited decisions by six other sister circuit courts that conflict with this one.

Seven other states currently have similar bans on the books.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra has yet to indicate whether he will seek an appeal from a larger panel of judges on the circuit. The case has the potential to head to the Supreme Court, which has generally avoided many Second Amendment challenges in recent years.

As the Associated Press reports, today’s ruling upholds an earlier San Diego district court ruling from 2017. And the NRA is more than likely to push to get this case before the Supreme Court now that it has a conservative majority.

Bizarrely, in his majority opinion, Judge Lee cites violence against Black people by the Ku Klux Klan and recent violence against Asian Americans stemming from stereotypes connected with the coronavirus (he doesn’t mention the president’s own incitement of this racial animus) as reasons why high-capacity magazines are necessary for self-defense. Also, he cites the fact that many communities either distrust law enforcement to protect them, or they live in rural places where such protection isn’t always guaranteed.

To wit, from the decision:

While Hollywood and the Bay Area symbolize California to the world, the Golden State is in fact a much more diverse and vibrant place, with people living in sparsely populated rural counties, seemingly deserted desert towns, and majestic mountain villages. In such places, the closest law enforcement may be far, far away — and it may take substantial time for the county sheriff to respond. And it is no guarantee that the things that go bump in the night come alone; indeed, burglars often ply their trade in groups recognizing strength in numbers.

Thus, you need a gun magazine with more than 10 bullets to defend your homestead against marauding gangs!

Anyway, expect a lot more of this bullshit now that Trump and McConnell have succeeded in packing the courts with judges whose opinions adhere to conservative politics more than sound legal reasoning.

[ad_2]

Source link

Articles You May Like

What to know about Tim Walz’s views and policy record before the VP debate
I survived Sandy Hook — I want a president who will tackle gun violence
Walz and Vance’s views on abortion, education, child care, guns
NRA targets Sen Sherrod Brown in 7-figure ad buy in Ohio: ‘Vote like your life depends on it’
Ware Police chief crossed fuzzy ethical line on new gun bill

13 Comments

  1. 356991 607142 Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So good to uncover somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for starting this up. this website is something that is needed on the internet, someone with just a little originality. valuable job for bringing something new towards the internet! 266841

  2. 369498 790425Aw, this was a really good post. In thought I wish to put in writing like this moreover – taking time and precise effort to make an superb article but what can I say I procrastinate alot and under no circumstances seem to get something done. 359554

  3. 20212 328832I discovered your blog web site web site on the search engines and check several of your early posts. Always sustain up the very excellent operate. I recently additional increase Rss to my MSN News Reader. Looking for toward reading significantly more on your part later on! 15170

  4. 258086 788935Oh my goodness! an incredible write-up dude. Thanks a ton Even so We are experiencing issue with ur rss . Dont know why Cannot enroll in it. Can there be any person finding identical rss dilemma? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx 143961

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *