Rubel: The Battle Ahead In New Mexico’s 2nd Congressional District

Gun News

[ad_1]

Commentary: In 2002, Steve Pearce beat John Arthur Smith in what I believe was the most important election in southern New Mexico of the past two decades.

The seat in Congress that both men were running for was open for the first time since 1980. That was the year Harold Runnels died three months before the election. Runnels was so firmly entrenched that Republicans hadn’t even planned to contest him.

Joe Skeen launched a write-in campaign to win the seat, then went on to hold it for 11 terms. Runnels, a Democrat, and Skeen, a Republican, combined to hold the seat from 1970 until that election in 2002. It seemed clear that voters in the district were more loyal to the person than the party. 

I figured whoever won that year would be able to settle in. Pearce served for eight terms, and would probably be the incumbent today if not for his ambition for other offices.

  With a win this year, Democrat Xochitl Torres Small may also be able to settle in.

Torres Small defeated Yvette Herrell as part of the blue wave election of 2018, when Democrats flipped 41 seats in the House. The race was so close that it wasn’t decided until absentee ballots in Dona Ana County were counted the day after the election.

This year’s election will be a rematch. Herrell is coming off a bruising primary campaign against Claire Chase that seemed to be a contest as to which was more unquestioningly loyal to the president.

Both Torres Small and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden are now facing the same accusation: they might not be radical socialists, but they are under the control of more powerful forces in the Democratic Party who are.

Which is probably why you can’t turn on your TV these days without seeing a commercial of Torres Small shooting up the desert (in an environmentally responsible way, I’m sure) to demonstrate her support for gun rights. Or crawling across an oil rig to demonstrate her support for fracking.

I’m not suggesting that those commercials are disingenuous. They’re not. But, like all political ads, they’re incomplete. Yes, you oppose a ban on fracking, but what about produced water? And climate change? Yes, you support gun rights, but what about bumpstocks? 

Torres Small’s voting record her first term was that of a centrist. That’s probably best reflected by her split votes on the two gun safety bills passed by the House and stalled in the Senate. She voted for the bill to require background checks for weapons sales online and at gun shows, but was one of seven Democrats to vote against a bill that would have expanded the time allowed for background checks from three days to 10.

That bill was introduced by Rep. Jim Clyburn in honor of the nine people killed in a Charleston, South Carolina AME church. The FBI should have stopped the purchase of one of the guns used in that slaughter, but did not complete its background check within the required three days.

For many Democrats who worked hard to help Torres Small get elected, that vote was disappointing. And the split vote did nothing to win support from Republicans or the NRA, which has given her a “D” rating.

Political extremists promise instant results and dramatic change, which is why they are much more exciting. But only for one side.

Centrists can be frustrating for both sides. I suppose that’s the whole idea.

Walter Rubel can be reached at waltrubel@gmail.com.

[ad_2]

Source link

Articles You May Like

Too young to buy a rifle? NRA begs Supreme Court to overturn Florida law
Trump administration ends ban on devices that make rifles fire quicker
What Do We Know About the IVF Clinic Bomber and His Disturbing Beliefs?
Zero Like a Pro – The Boar Laser Boresighter by MCG Tactical Is Changing the Game
The Holster Redefining Everyday Carry — Comfort Meets Confidence

26 Comments

  1. 32147 986448Gems form the internet […]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly effectively worth checking out[…] 348584

  2. 752173 298036bless you with regard towards the specific blog post ive truly been searching regarding this kind of details on the web for sum time correct now as a result cheers 683658

  3. 570660 728650Outstanding post. I was checking constantly this blog and Im impressed! Really beneficial data specially the last part I care for such information much. I was seeking this specific data for a long time. Thank you and greatest of luck. 443958

  4. 53735 685975This style is steller! You surely know how to keep a reader entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (effectively, almostHaHa!) Amazing job. I truly enjoyed what you had to say, and far more than that, how you presented it. Too cool! 419184

  5. 522777 975433I like the beneficial info you supply in your articles. Ill bookmark your weblog and check once again here regularly. Im quite certain I will learn lots of new stuff proper here! Very best of luck for the next! 213571

  6. 348942 299473I discovered your blog site on google and check several of your early posts. Continue to maintain up the really good operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking forward to reading a lot more from you later on! 144081

  7. 786248 455377Once I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new feedback are added- checkbox and now every time a remark is added I get four emails with exactly the same comment. Is there any indicates you possibly can remove me from that service? Thanks! 734472

  8. 687161 478838Hey. Neat post. There is a problem together with your web site in firefox, and you may want to check this The browser could be the market chief and a large component of other folks will omit your outstanding writing because of this dilemma. 245974

  9. 324312 803459You produced some decent points there. I looked on the net to the issue and discovered most people goes together with along together with your web site. 500266

  10. 962167 930229Wonderful artical, I unfortunately had some problems printing this artcle out, The print formating looks a bit screwed over, something you may want to look into. 134876

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *