ILA | Big Lie Country: Anti-gun Interests Work to Deceive Montanans

Gun News


Gun control advocates know that Montanans cherish their right to keep and bear arms. Thats why this election season, out-of-state anti-gun interests are working to deceive rather than win over Montana voters. Case in point is the deceptive messaging of the gun control supporters opposed to pro-Second Amendment ballot measure LR-130. 

Reflecting the states overwhelming respect for the Second Amendment, Montanas gun laws generally respect gun ownership and the Right-to-Carry for self-defense. However, a deficiency in the states firearms preemption statute has permitted politically-motivated local governments to undermine the Second Amendment by creating a confusing patchwork of laws that places well-meaning gun owners in legal peril simply for exercising their Right-to-Carry.

At present, Montana Code Annotated Section 7-1-111 restricts a local government unit with self-government powers from exercising any power that applies to or affects the right to keep or bear arms.” However, the statute provides an exemption to this prohibition which states, a local government has the power to regulate the carrying of concealed weapons.” Therefore, a local government entity with self-governing powers has some authority to restrict the Right-to-Carry.

Moreover, Section 45-8-351(2)(a) empowers a county, city, town, consolidated local government” to restrict the Right-to-Carry at a public assembly, publicly owned building, park under its jurisdiction, or school.” 

LR-130 would amend Section 7-11-111 to remove a local government unit with self-government powersauthority to restrict the Right-to-Carry. The measure would also curtail the power of a county, city, town, or consolidated local government to create gun-free zones. Under the proposed legislation, a locality could still restrict the open carry and unpermitted concealed carry at a publicly owned and occupied building,” such as a school. Another statute, Section 45-8-361, also prohibits firearms in school buildings. LR-130 would create a predictable framework that would allow Montanans to exercise their Right-to-Carry with confidence while moving about the state.

These changes are vital to Montana gun owners. Those wondering how anti-gun localities might abuse their authority to restrict the Right-to-Carry need only look at recent events in Virginia. Following a change that weakened Virginias firearms preemption statute, anti-gun cities and localities raced to enact a slew of new incomprehensible gun-free zones. This included unforeseeable roving gun free zones that extend to public sidewalks and streets.

Such local restrictions are enacted out of political prejudice rather than concern for public safety. A survey of the available research on gun-free zones conducted by the RAND Corporation found no qualifying studies showing that gun-free zones decreased” violent crime. 

The political committee that out-of-state anti-gun interests have used to oppose LR-130 is named Vote No on LR-130. The front group has been sending out the following deceptive mailers.

Notice that the mailers dont explain the purpose or contours of LR-130. The propaganda also mischaracterizes LR-130 as confusing” and poorly written.” In truth, the measure merely makes minor alterations to two existing statutes that are limited to one sentence of Section 7-1-111 and one sentence in Section 45-8-351.

Worse, are the mailers deceptive appeals to protect our freedoms” and Montanas current respect for the Second Amendment. In actuality, LR-130 would help to better protect Montanansfreedom and their ability to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

The deceptive language of the Vote No on LR-130 committees propaganda is even more appalling considering the source. Despite promoting messaging like Why Change Gun Laws That Work?,” the political committee is backed by out-of-state anti-gun interests that are devoted to enacting the most egregious forms of gun control.

Vote No on LR-130s political committee finance reports show that the campaign has received continued support from New York City billionaire Michael Bloombergs Everytown for Gun Safety gun control group. Among the litany of gun controls the group pushes are a ban on commonly owned semi-automatic firearms like the AR-15, a ban on standard capacity magazines, waiting periods, and gun confiscation order legislation that empowers the state to seize a persons firearms without due process.

The political committee finance reports also show that Vote No on LR-130 is being supported by Washington states Alliance for Gun Responsibility (AGR), formerly Washington Alliance for Gun Responsibility. AGR was responsible for Washingtons Initiative 594, which criminalized the private transfer of firearms in the Evergreen State. An actually confusing” and poorly written” measure, the subsequent law went so far as to restrict how students could be introduced to the basics of safe firearms handling during hunter education courses. The group also pushed Initiative 1639, which heavily restricted the acquisition and possession of semi-automatic rifles, including a requirement that these firearms be registered with the government.

Much like Everytown, AGR and its political activities are bankrolled by wealthy anti-gun elites. For I-594, billionaire venture capitalist Nicolas Hanauer gave more than $1.3 million. Microsoft founder Bill Gates and wife Melinda provided $525,000 each, former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and wife Connie gave $500,000 and $580,000 respectively, and company co-founder Paul Allen gave $500,000. For AGRs I-1639, Microsofts Paul Allen gave 1.2 million, Nicolas and Leslie Hanauer gave $1.4 million, the Ballmers gave more than $1.1 million.

NRA members and gun rights activists should work to share with their family, friends, neighbors, and other freedom-minded individuals the truth about how LR-130 will protect gun owners from local government overreach. Gun rights supporters should also work to expose the deceptive practices of the Vote No on LR-130 campaign and the out-of-state interests backing their anti-Second Amendment effort.



Source link

Articles You May Like

Will Tulsi Gabbard Be Donald Trump’s VP Pick? – The American Spectator
Supreme Court trains sights on US ban on gun ‘bump stocks’
Former CEO Wayne LaPierre Ordered to Repay over $4 Million to NRA
CNN Host Abby Phillip Pushes Michael Moore to Accuse Israel of Genocide in Gaza
Ohio Senate committees take up bills on guns, “crisis pregnancy centers” this week

21 Comments

  1. 404955 211397Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything like this before. So good to search out any individual with some original thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for starting this up. this site is one thing thats wanted on the web, somebody with a bit of originality. beneficial job for bringing something new towards the internet! 859772

  2. 670980 743846An attention-grabbing dialogue is worth comment. I feel that its very best to write extra on this topic, it wont be a taboo subject nonetheless usually individuals are not sufficient to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers 317500

  3. 714407 399019Private Krankenversicherung – Nur dann, wenn Sie sich fr die Absicherung ber die Rentenversicherung entschieden haben, dann knnen Sie sich sicher sein, dass Sie im Alter so viel Geld haben, damit Sie Ihren Lebensstandard halten knnen. 503802

  4. 378272 276783I believe 1 of your commercials caused my internet browser to resize, you could nicely want to put that on your blacklist. 544234

  5. 929223 381203Dude.. My group is not considerably into looking at, but somehow I acquired to read several articles on your blog. Its amazing how intriguing it is for me to pay a visit to you fairly often. 752462

  6. 812696 30365Oh my goodness! a great write-up dude. Thanks a good deal Nonetheless We are experiencing trouble with ur rss . Do not know why Not able to sign up to it. Possibly there is anybody finding identical rss problem? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx 426793

  7. 710101 844834An intriguing discussion is worth comment. Im confident that you basically write regarding this topic, may possibly possibly not be considered a taboo topic but typically persons are too little to communicate on such topics. To another. Cheers 44346

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *