Nathalie Provost and Heidi Rathjen: Liberals should respect their promise to ban assault weapons

Firearms

[ad_1]

By Nathalie Provost and Heidi Rathjen

During the last federal election, the Liberal government promised to ban all military-style semi-automatic assault weapons, such as the AR-15. The government also pledged to buy back all legally-purchased assault weapons currently in circulation.

However, as the Liberal government moved to prohibit some 1,500 existing models, it has appeared to back out of its election promise. Government officials have indicated it may create a program that would instead allow current owners to keep their banned weapons—although their use, transportation and sale would be prohibited.

For those of us who have been fighting for decades to ban assault weapons in Canada, a buy-back program that includes an offer to grandfather current weapons would be a huge disappointment.

Indeed, thousands of weapons grandfathered in the 1990s are still in circulation today. Without a mandatory buy-back program, tens of thousands of semi-automatic military-style weapons will remain in private hands for generations to come and, with them, their inherent risks to public safety.

A new survey by Environics Research commissioned by PolyRemembers shows that the majority of Canadians (61 percent) want the Liberal government to buy back all existing assault weapons.

There is majority support in both urban (62 percent) and rural areas (55 percent) for the measure. Nearly half of people living in a gun-owning household (46 percent) also support a mandatory buy-back program.

Last fall, many victims’ relatives and survivors of the 1989 École Polytechnique massacre endorsed the Liberals precisely because of their strong position to ban assault weapons, as Australia and New Zealand have done. In terms of public safety, there is a world of difference between a complete ban and an incomplete one.

Backtracking on the promise to remove existing weapons would be a big win for the gun lobby.

First, with a significant number of assault weapons remaining in the hands of current owners, it will be a lot easier for a subsequent government to repeal the ban.

In fact, Conservative Party leader Erin O’Toole has already pledged to cancel the measure. The gun lobby is telling its members to “keep your guns” and “be patient”.

Secondly, grandfathering an assault weapons ban incentivizes their current owners to keep them and to support the most radical gun-rights organizations that continue to defend the interests of assault weapons manufacturers, collectors and “tactical” shooters who all profit from or use military-style guns.

These lobby groups will remain well-funded and energized and will continue to seek to normalize the private ownership of military-style weapons, along with the American NRA-style ideology associated with them.

Finally, allowing the continued ownership of assault weapons will pretty much guarantee that this debate never ends. The Liberals will continue to be criticized for not getting the job done when they had the chance and Conservatives will continue to be supported by an extremist pro-gun base that compels any new leader to embrace a position objectionable to most Canadians.

It’s in the public’s interest to settle this debate once and for all. That can only be achieved with a complete and final ban on assault weapons in Canada.

While there has been concrete progress made by the Trudeau government on the issue of assault weapons, there should be no backtracking on the mandatory buy-back program that was promised to Canadians.

As the Minister of Justice himself recently has said, weapons designed for the battlefield have no place on our streets or in our communities. We totally agree. Now we expect the government to be consistent and to genuinely protect the public from these weapons of war.

More

[ad_2]

Source link

Articles You May Like

SCOTUS Skepticism Over Gun Ban for Cannabis Consumers
Supreme Court Weighs Felony Conviction for Gun Owner Who Uses Marijuana
Machine gun legislation rat-tat-tat-tat-tats through West Virginia Senate
Supreme Court appears skeptical of law banning drug users from owning guns
Supreme Court might let marijuana users own guns

25 Comments

  1. 962220 880218I dont normally have a look at these types of sites (Im a pretty modest person) – but even though I was a bit shocked as I was reading, I was undoubtedly a bit excited as nicely. Thanks for making my day 236572

  2. 877825 290782Oh my goodness! a amazing post dude. Thanks Nevertheless My business is experiencing problem with ur rss . Dont know why Not able to sign up for it. Possibly there is any person obtaining identical rss difficulty? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx 239471

  3. 935096 573386Someone essentially assist to make severely posts I may well state. That may be the extremely initial time I frequented your internet site page and so far? I surprised with the analysis you made to create this particular submit incredible. Magnificent task! 858892

  4. 121689 692216Usually I dont read write-up on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up extremely compelled me to try and do so! Your writing style has been amazed me. Thanks, very fantastic post. 393952

  5. 51176 746149Largest lover messages were created to share it together with your and gives honour with the bride and groom. Really sound systems facing unnecessary throngs of people really should take into account each of our valuable concept of all presenting, which is ones trailer. greatest man toasts 476638

  6. 458340 550749Hmm is anyone else having issues with the images on this weblog loading? Im trying to figure out if its a issue on my finish or if its the blog. Any responses would be greatly appreciated. 442394

  7. 64181 829902Its a shame you dont have a donate button! Id most definitely donate to this outstanding web website! I suppose in the meantime ill be pleased with bookmarking and putting your Rss feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will share this blog with my Facebook group: ) 524605

  8. 109300 109022Hosting a weblog composing facility (in a broad sense) requires unlimited space. So I suggest you to discover such internet hosting (internet space provider) that supply flexibility inside your internet space. 811642

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *