SB 224: Lock Up Your Guns or Face State Charges
Dear New Mexico NRA Member:
Another legislative session — another ineffective, intrusive and unenforceable gun control proposal. You wonder what they’ll come up with next? Well, here it is: Senate Bill 224 by Sen. Antoinette Sedillo Lopez (D-ABQ), who must be auditioning for anti-gun billionaire Bloomberg’s support in her campaign for the 1st Congressional District.
SB 224 reads as follows: “It is an offense for a firearm owner or authorized user to store or keep a firearm in any premises unless the firearm is secured in a locked container or secured by a gun lock or other means so as to render the firearms inaccessible or unusable to any person other than the owner or authorized user.”
You could be fined up to $500 for failing to do so, or $1,000 if a minor, an “at risk” person or a prohibited person obtains the firearm. Both are misdemeanor penalties.
But, it doesn’t stop there. The bill could actually make you a criminal if a minor were allowed access to your firearm, unless he or she is at least twelve years of age and has already successfully completed a firearms safety training course. So you could be charged with a misdemeanor for teaching your kid how to shoot.
Please contact your state senators and urge them to OPPOSE SB 224! You may also find contact information for senators here, and if you don’t know who your senator is, click here.
524793 536154I dugg some of you post as I thought they were very beneficial invaluable 617806
676948 100671Id always want to be update on new articles on this internet website , saved to favorites ! . 50034
756056 870413I admire your piece of function, regards for all the intriguing posts . 968444
762401 877727I was wondering if you ever thought of changing the structure of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or 2 pictures. Maybe you could space it out better? 195293
223572 863631Id need to verify with you here. Which isnt something I often do! I enjoy studying a publish that can make men and women think. Also, thanks for permitting me to remark! 938300
348838 271226Wow, remarkable weblog structure! How long have you been running a blog for? you created running a weblog appear straightforward. The entire look of your site is magnificent, neatly as the content material material! 708649
375298 47182There is noticeably a bundle to comprehend about this. I assume you made specific nice points in functions also. 723927
415141 81930You will be able use all sorts of advised attractions with various car treatments. A quantity of sell traditional tools numerous demand families for almost any event for any investment district, or even for a holiday in new york. ???? ??? ?????? ????? 19559
915581 47746Dude.. My group is not considerably into seeking at, but somehow I acquired to read several articles on your blog. Its fantastic how interesting its for me to go to you fairly often. 88773
280979 215300You completed certain excellent points there. I did searching on the subject matter and discovered most persons will go together together with your weblog 770221
755726 923850This web-site can be a walk-through rather than the details you wished about it and didnt know who need to. Glimpse here, and you will definitely discover it. 517804
597179 39772Once I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new feedback are added- checkbox and now every time a remark is added I get four emails with exactly the same comment. Is there any indicates you possibly can remove me from that service? Thanks! 428445
456019 923156I believe this website contains some very very good information for every person : D. 889105
521737 674473Very informative and great complex body part of articles , now thats user pleasant (:. 286480
334271 128882Thank you, Ive lately been searching for info about this topic for ages and yours could be the greatest Ive identified out so far. But, what in regards to the bottom line? Are you sure concerning the supply? 159722