ILA | New Jersey: Expungement Bill Threatens Privacy

Gun News

On Thursday, March 11, the Senate Law & Public Safety Committee will hold a hearing on S.568.  The bill, by Sen. Fred Madden (D), would require that “certain law enforcement officials be notified when a person applies to the court to have a mental health record expunged for the purposes of purchasing a firearm.”

This bill unnecessarily injects law enforcement into the expungement process.  An expungement is meant to rehabilitate the rights of those who can reestablish their fitness and competency through trained medical professionals.  This bill is antithetical to what an expungement is truly supposed to be, and it also creates new additional problems.  Decisions to expunge records should be made by medical professionals and judges, and release of these types of records represents a violation of existing medical privacy laws.  This indiscretion could potentially place the state in jeopardy of having to forfeit millions of dollars in grant monies for the breech. 

While we question why this bill is needed in the first place, at the very least, simple amendments could be adopted to remove the most flagrant problems with the legislation.  First and foremost, the bill should be amended to clearly state that expungements and expunged records not be used as a basis for denial of any firearms permit or license.  S.568 should also be clear that expungement decisions should not be based on personal opinions but, rather, pre-existing medical records only.  These are just a couple of the obvious flaws with the bill.  It is important that NRA members contact members of the committee immediately and ask them to oppose the bill if it is not amended to address these concerns. 

The Senate Law & Public Safety Committee will begin the hearing at 1:15 p.m. The Statehouse remains closed to the public, and public participation will be via telephone and video only.  You can watch the hearing at

Please contact members of the committee and respectfully request that they oppose S.568. 


Source link

Articles You May Like

New York passes new gun law in response to US Supreme Court ruling – JURIST
Newtown-based firearms trade association spends more lobbying Congress than NRA | Connecticut
New York lawmakers to loosen gun laws after Supreme Court ruling
Editorial: Standing up to gun dealers in Riverhead Town


  1. 687102 208834Wholesale Cheap Handbags Will you be ok merely repost this on my web site? Ive to allow credit where it can be due. Have got an excellent day! 953977

  2. 165574 909574Aw, this was a actually nice post. In concept I wish to put in writing like this additionally ?taking time and actual effort to make an outstanding article?nevertheless what can I say?I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done. 935674

  3. 24319 106654Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn something like this before. So good to search out any person with some unique thoughts on this topic. realy thank you for starting this up. this web internet site is 1 thing thats necessary on the net, someone with a bit of originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet! 892908

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.