US Supreme Court to hear challenge on carrying concealed handguns | Courts News

Gun News

[ad_1]

The lawsuit seeks an unfettered right to carry concealed handguns. Lower courts have already rejected its arguments.

The US Supreme Court has stepped back into the heated debate over gun rights, agreeing to hear a challenge backed by the National Rifle Association to New York state’s restrictions on people carrying concealed handguns in public in a case that could further undermine firearms control efforts nationally.

The justices on Monday took up an appeal by two gun owners and the New York affiliate of the NRA, an influential gun rights group closely aligned with Republicans, of a lower court ruling throwing out their challenge to the restrictions on concealed handguns outside the home.

Lower courts rejected the argument made by the plaintiffs that the restrictions violated the US Constitution’s Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The lawsuit seeks an unfettered right to carry concealed handguns in public.

Seized handguns at the police headquarters in New York, New York [File: Eric Thayer/Reuters]

The case could lead to the most consequential ruling on the scope of the Second Amendment in more than a decade. The court’s 6-3 conservative majority is seen as sympathetic to an expansive view of Second Amendment rights.

A state firearms licensing officer had granted the two gun owners “concealed carry” permits but restricted them to hunting and target practice, prompting the legal challenge.

banner

The debate over gun control in the United States has intensified in the wake of a spate of recent mass shootings. A day after an April 15 mass shooting in Indianapolis in which a gunman killed eight employees at a FedEx facility and then himself, President Joe Biden called gun violence in the United States a “national embarrassment“.

Biden, a longtime advocate of gun control, has taken some steps to tighten federal firearms regulations. But major policy changes would require congressional passage, and Senate Republicans stand in the way of Democratic-backed gun control measures already passed in the House of Representatives.

The case taken by the justices centres on New York’s law on carrying concealed handguns, which requires a showing of “proper cause”. Under the law, residents may obtain licences that are restricted to hunting and target practice, or if they hold certain jobs, such as a bank messenger or correctional officer.

But to carry a concealed handgun without restriction, applicants must convince a firearms licensing officer that they have an actual – rather than a speculative – need for self-defence.

The Gun Violence Memorial, an installation featuring 38,000 silk white roses in 4,000 vases to commemorate the roughly 40,000 Americans who die annually in gun violence, set up on the National Mall in the foreground of the US Capitol in Washington, DC, in April 2021 [Carlos Barria/Reuters]

The New York State Rifle and Pistol Association, along with two of its members from the upstate capital region, Robert Nash and Brandon Koch, sued in federal court. Both men said they “do not face any special or unique danger” to their lives but want to carry a handgun for self-defence.

“We’re confident that the court will tell New York and the other states that our Second Amendment right to defend ourselves is fundamental, and doesn’t vanish when we leave our homes,” said Jason Ouimet, executive director of NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action.

Gun control advocates said that the stakes are especially high given that gun violence has risen during the coronavirus pandemic. A ruling weakening gun control “could make it even harder for cities and states to grapple with this public health crisis,” said Eric Tirschwell, managing director of the Everytown Law legal activist group.

[ad_2]

Source link

Articles You May Like

Watch vs. Warning: Turn a Weather Alert Into a Household Action

28 Comments

  1. 321005 422810I recognize there is a great deal of spam on this web site. Do you require aid cleaning them up? I might aid in between courses! 630076

  2. 951755 995796Your writing is fine and gives food for thought. I hope that Ill have a lot more time to read your articles . Regards. I wish you which you frequently publish new texts and invite you to greet me 668483

  3. 139288 317418Id have to speak to you here. Which isnt something Which i do! I enjoy to reading a post that should get folks to think. Also, thank you for allowing me to comment! 778269

  4. 682305 775506An interesting discussion is price comment. I think which you ought to write extra on this topic, it may not be a taboo subject but typically individuals are not enough to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers 129409

  5. 161964 812702This web page is often a walk-through for all with the details it suited you with this and didnt know who to ask. Glimpse here, and you will surely discover it. 274074

  6. 17467 228384A persons Are usually Weight loss is certainly a practical and flexible an eating plan method manufactured for those that suffer that want to weight loss and therefore ultimately conserve a much much more culture. weight loss 997817

  7. 946726 791511Aw, i thought this was quite a good post. In concept I would like to devote writing such as this moreover – spending time and actual effort to produce a fantastic article but exactly what do I say I procrastinate alot by no indicates manage to get something done. 890230

  8. 845487 629432Magnificent beat ! I would like to apprentice whilst you amend your internet site, how could i subscribe for a weblog website? The account helped me a appropriate deal. I had been a bit bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided brilliant transparent idea 202288

  9. 397270 268333I cannot thank you fully for the blogposts on your internet page. I know you placed lots of time and effort into all of them and hope you know how considerably I appreciate it. I hope I will do precisely exactly the same for one more individual at some point. Palm Beach Condos 905239

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *