ILA | Did ATF Nominee David Chipman Lose his Duty Firearm?

Gun News

[ad_1]

We’ve written quite a bit (here, here, here, here, and here) about how Chipman—a man who has spent the last several years as a high-profile, anti-gun lobbyist—is truly unqualified to serve as Director of ATF. But we haven’t touched on one aspect of his written testimony that has recently come to light in a number of news articles.

Fox News reports that four U.S. Senators—Tom Cotton (R-AR), Ted Cruz (R-TX), Mike Lee (R-UT), and Judiciary ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-IA)— each asked, in writing, whether Chipman had “ever misplace(d) or (had) his firearm stolen?”

According to Fox, Chipman replied “to each senator with a definite ‘No.’”

But the article goes on to state that “a Senate staffer said their office has received information suggesting that Chipman’s answer may not be true, and they are still looking into the matter.” It further noted, “A separate source familiar with the allegations told Fox News that ‘Senate staff continue their inquiries about Chipman’s mishandling of service weapons.’”

So, why this curious question from these senators?

Another article, from The Federalist, states that, in spite of Chipman’s denial, “a group familiar with the situation that spoke to his former colleagues told GOP senators they learned differently.”

The article went on to state:

“We were told multiple times by his former colleagues that he had lost his service weapon,” Tom Jones, co-founder of (the American Accountability Foundation), said in an interview. “We shared this information with the Senate, who has taken up the matter. Often a federal employee’s personnel file is made available to the Senate and would clear this and other disciplinary matters up. This week, Chipman refused the Senate’s request to provide his personnel file, which raises questions on this matter and what else he is hiding.”

The ATF stated to Fox News, “There is no record of any of Mr. Chipman’s weapons being lost or stolen.” But the claimed lack of a “record” doesn’t necessarily put the issue to rest.

We have no idea whether the allegation of a lost firearm is true. It’s certainly plausible. And while we strongly support the adage of “innocent until proven guilty,” that doesn’t mean ignore investigating something simply because the accused denies it ever happened.

And, when it comes to Chipman, we’ve seen him say and write things that are demonstrably false in order to promote the anti-gun agenda. So maybe this issue does deserve more scrutiny, rather than just relying on the word of a man desperate to take charge of an agency that could be abused to fulfill all of his personal anti-gun goals.

Was there an allegation or a concern that he had lost a firearm, but an inconclusive investigation meant nothing was officially recorded? Was one temporarily unaccounted for, but after being located, the “record” shows no firearm “lost or stolen”? Even worse, was one actually stolen from him, but later recovered, so the record was “updated” to show no theft?

There must be some nexus to the allegation, but this speculation could all be easily put to rest.

If Chipman would provide his personnel file, that should offer definitive clarification regarding this issue. After all, if he wishes to be head of the federal agency ostensibly in charge of policing our national gun laws, shouldn’t he make sure there are absolutely no questions regarding his ability to police his own firearms? But, as the article from The Federalist alleges, he won’t release his file.

Which begs another question: Why won’t he make his personnel file available?

Wouldn’t it make sense for a former federal law enforcement agent who now wants to head the agency that employed him to release his personnel records?

Again, we are talking about a man who has a history of making anti-gun statements, and promoting anti-gun policies, who wants to head the one federal agency that has the greatest potential impact on the rights of responsible, law-abiding gun owners. Shouldn’t we know, for sure, if he has always been responsible when it comes to his own firearms and if he has been completely honest in his responses to Congress?

Gun owners are constantly told that they need to allow the government to have access to information regarding their firearms. David Chipman has been the head lobbyist for groups that have advocated for this by way of licensing and registration schemes for gun owners. Should he not hold himself to the same standards demanded of gun owners?

After all, if he’s got nothing to hide, where is the harm?

[ad_2]

Source link

Articles You May Like

Watch vs. Warning: Turn a Weather Alert Into a Household Action

29 Comments

  1. 488403 784108While youre any of the lucky enough choices, it comes evidently, while capture the fancy with the specific coveted by ly folks other beneficial you you meet may possibly possibly properly have hard times this specific problem. pre owned awnings 626262

  2. 522519 96023Generally I do not read post on blogs, even so I would like to say that this write-up extremely forced me to take a look at and do so! Your writing taste has been surprised me. Thank you, quite fantastic post. 275074

  3. 992513 494607Thank you, Ive lately been looking for info about this subject for ages and yours may be the greatest Ive found out so far. But, what in regards towards the bottom line? Are you confident concerning the supply? 56596

  4. 495193 872460I discovered your blog internet site on google and verify some of your early posts. Continue to sustain up the superb operate. I simply extra up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking for forward to reading extra from you in a although! 647897

  5. 891475 315700Greetings! Quick question thats completely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My weblog looks weird when viewing from my iphone. Im trying to find a template or plugin that might be able to fix this problem. Should you have any recommendations, please share. Appreciate it! 522772

  6. 774835 547879Properly, that is wonderful, but consider further options weve got here? Could you mind submitting an additional article relating to them also? Numerous thanks! 747268

  7. 993194 640058Wow, superb blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging appear effortless. The overall look of your internet site is magnificent, as well as the content material! xrumer 97050

  8. 275919 288495Id should talk to you here. Which is not some thing I do! I quite like reading a post which will make men and women believe. Also, numerous thanks permitting me to comment! 373310

  9. 226503 546409Hi, you used to write superb posts, but the last several posts have been kinda boring I miss your fantastic posts. Past few posts are just just a little bit out of track! 869921

  10. 91091 851510Superb post but I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this subject? Id be quite thankful should you could elaborate slightly bit much more. Thanks! 717315

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *