Cruz Leads 24 GOP Senators to File Amicus Brief in Supreme Court Case Protecting Second Amendment

Gun News

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, led 24 other Republican senators to file an amicus brief, arguing that the New York state laws making it hard to carry a gun outside the home violate the Second Amendment.

In regards to the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen case, which is currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Courtthe senators wrote, “[L]egislators—whether in Albany or Washington, D.C.—have neither the power nor the authority to second-guess the policy judgments made by the Framers and enshrined in the Constitution.” They added that the Framers’ “decision to guarantee the right of the people to keep and bear arms after weighing all the policy considerations is definitive.”

The New York State Rifle and Pistol Association (NYSRPA), representing Robert Nash and Brendan Koch, brought a federal lawsuit in February 2018 against New York’s police superintendent and a local licensing officer.

After the New York District Court sided with the superintendent, NYSRPA filed a petition with the Supreme Court in Dec. 2020 in which the question presented to the Court was “whether the Second Amendment allows the government to prohibit ordinary law-abiding citizens from carrying handguns outside the home for self-defense.”

In a Wednesday press statement, NRA-ILA praised the Republican senators who filed an amicus brief for “supporting the individual, fundamental right of self-defense outside the home.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who was among the senators who signed the brief, said it is their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution.

“[E]lected officials swear to support and defend the Constitution, and so must respect when the Framers took a decision out of their hands. The Second Amendment’s guarantee of the right to keep and bear arms cannot be second-guessed by legislators across the country who simply disagree with the choice the Framers made.”

On April 26, 2021, the Supreme Court granted the petition, but it has limited the question to “whether the State’s denial of petitioners’ applications for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment.”

This will be the first Second Amendment case the Supreme Court considers since District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, in which it was decided that U.S. citizens could possess guns for self-defense in their homes. This time, the Supreme Court will consider the question of whether people can carry guns outside the home, which currently is being decided by individual states.

Source link

Articles You May Like

Another shooting can be prevented if we enforce the law
Malta Republican brings ‘constitutional carry’ referendum
Ranking presidents over the past eight decades by final approval rating
Biden doubles down on ‘assault weapons’ ban, says he’ll see through the process like ‘in 1994’
On guns, bipartisanship clears a very low hurdle in Virginia


  1. 324732 310994Aw, this was a actually good post. In concept I wish to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and actual effort to make an excellent article nonetheless what can I say I procrastinate alot and not at all appear to get something done. 31574

  2. 213395 263981This web-site can be a walk-through rather than the details you wished about it and didnt know who ought to. Glimpse here, and youll undoubtedly discover it. 228699

  3. 803490 532793Thank you for every other informative website. Exactly where else could I get that type of info written in such a perfect indicates? Ive a mission that Im just now operating on, and Ive been at the appear out for such information. 467198

  4. 109142 235926I like what you guys are up too. Such smart function and reporting! Carry on the superb works guys Ive incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it will improve the value of my website 672019

  5. 608156 347398Thank you for writing this tremendous top quality post. The details in this material confirms my point of view and you truly laid it out nicely. I could never have written an write-up this very good. 760907

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *