The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Wednesday in the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. (NYSRPA) v. Bruen, which focuses on whether New York State violated plaintiffs Robert Nash and Brandon Koch’s Second Amendment rights by denying them unrestricted concealed carry permits. Lawyer Paul Clement is representing both men and the NYSRPA, which is an offshoot of the National Rifle Association.
A former solicitor general for the Bush Administration, Clement is known as the attorney who’s argued the most cases before SCOTUS since 2000—and has consistently represented parties on the wrong side of history. Clement famously left the law firm he was at in 2011 to continue trying to defend the Defense of Marriage Act and its sympathizers. He also fought against the Affordable Care Act in 2012 and defended tactics used by the Bush Administration during the war on terror.
It appears as if this time, however, Clement will score a win for his clients. Many Supreme Court Justices made no secret of the fact that they were skeptical of the New York law that only allows residents to concealed carry if they can provide “proper cause.” Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito pushed back against the requirement, with Kavanaugh at one point asking, “Why isn’t it good enough to say I live in a violent areas and I want to be able to defend myself?”
Nash and Koch are both NYSRPA members and sought concealed carry permits for the purpose of self-defense. They were issued restricted licenses allowing them to hunt and target shoot, but not to carry their weapons under any other circumstances. The two argued that their completion of firearms safety courses should allow them to carry weapons for self-defense, though a licensing officer still refused to grant them concealed carry permits.
Both men live outside of New York City in fairly rural areas, though the metropolitan city came up frequently throughout the nearly two hours of arguments. Chief Justice John Roberts insinuated that those in major cities have even more reason to be allowed to carry a weapon and mused about “how many muggings take place in a forest” as opposed to a big city. Nash, who lives upstate in Rensselaer County, previously stated that a spate of robberies was one of the reasons why he sought the permit in the first place.
While many of the justices looked to historic rulings to guide their eventual decisions, Justice Neil Gorsuch appeared willing to test just how far the Second Amendment should reach when it comes to carrying a gun outside the home. Participating via video due to a stomach bug, Gorsuch asked Clement about similar cases and how much history should weigh on a decision like this.
Gorsuch cited the last landmark SCOTUS case to do with gun control, 2008’s Columbia v. Heller, which allows for the “individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home” under the Second Amendment. Clement argued earlier that the case shows how analysis of the Second Amendment has continued within a contemporary context as opposed to stopping in 1871 when the state of Texas passed a landmark law establishing guidelines for concealed carrying.
You can listen to the full oral arguments here. A decision on this case isn’t expected until next spring.
From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web
559683 737607Cheers for this superb. I was wondering whether you were preparing of publishing related posts to this. .Maintain up the exceptional articles! 238014
577752 178528Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in reality was a amusement account it. Look complicated to far delivered agreeable from you! Nonetheless, how can we maintain in touch? 104606
819102 743834Hi there. Extremely cool website!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Great .. I will bookmark your internet site and take the feeds additionallyI am glad to locate so much useful information correct here inside the post. Thanks for sharing 668266
158273 378947hi this post support me full . .in the event you want watches men check out my web sites is quite assist you for men watches. .thank man excellent job. 899591
379808 236744I like the beneficial information you give inside your articles. Ill bookmark your weblog and check once more here regularly. Im quite certain I will learn lots of new stuff correct here! Greatest of luck for the next! 471493
985923 247892An extremely fascinating read, I may possibly possibly not agree completely, but you do make some very valid points. 692439
420998 505291A actually exciting examine, I might possibly not concur entirely, but you do make some genuinely legitimate points. 784580
239354 402339I real delighted to find this internet site on bing, just what I was looking for : D also bookmarked . 256747
679952 897389Your weblog is showing much more interest and enthusiasm. Thank you so significantly. 681343
133161 352675I ran into this page accidentally, surprisingly, this really is a terrific site. The web site owner has done a fantastic job writing/collecting articles to post, the info here is genuinely insightful. You just secured yourself a guarenteed reader. 267885
365544 447831You got a extremely fantastic site, Glad I observed it via yahoo. 866918