The Supreme Court and the 2nd Amendment – Sentinel and Enterprise

Concealed Carry


When I saw the recent article entitled, “A Supreme Threat of Gun Violence in Second Amendment Fight” and further saw that the author, a Ph.D. scientist working for the Brady anti-gun group, had a son who was shot and killed, I sadly knew two things. The author had suffered tragedy, and no claim of data on his part could be considered credible.

Ponder this. The author claims with certainty that “But data shows that allowing people to carry guns in public with few restrictions is unsafe. Gun crimes and deaths increase dramatically. Research found that states that relax concealed carry laws have a 13-15% higher violent crime rates within 10 years.”

Really? What studies? There are no references. And scientists know how to mention a reference. But here, nothing.

So I did my own study using the FBI database (not the Brady or NRA data). Here is an interesting fact. Here in New England we have an interesting experiment being run. Massachusetts is considered highly restrictive regarding who it allows to carry load firearms in public. Its violent crime rate is 308.8 offenses per 100,000. To the north of us, Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont all have constitutional carry. Anyone may carry a firearm loaded and concealed. What are their violent crime rates? Maine: 108.6. New Hampshire: 146.4. Vermont: 173.4. In other words, the local states that have the very scheme the author is fear mongering over, are anywhere from 43% to 65% less violent.

To really bring this home, ponder this. Lowell and Nashua, N.H., are minutes away from each other. Lowell has a population of a little over 100,000 people, Nashua has a little less. Lowell has one of the most restrictive firearms licensing in Massachusetts. Nashua has no licensing requirement. Yet Lowell had 270 violent offenses in 2020, 46 of which involved firearms. Nashua had less than half the number of violent offenses at 105, only seven of which were firearms (almost 85% less).

One has to wonder what data this “scientist” ever bothered to look at.

— Al PrescottWestford



Source link

Articles You May Like

ILA | Minnesota: Gun Control Bills Committee Hearing on Friday!
California Officials Push New Gun Laws After Mass Shootings
ILA | Hawaii: Senate Public Safety Committee to Hear CCW Restriction/Reform Legislation
As trauma from gun violence builds, survivors campaign for change
Why Ben Gvir wants more guns on the streets

7 Comments

  1. 865091 34950You could definitely see your enthusiasm within the function you write. The world hopes for more passionate writers like you who arent afraid to say how they believe. Always go right after your heart. 152753

  2. 850678 500554This is genuinely interesting, You are a extremely skilled blogger. Ive joined your rss feed and appear forward to seeking more of your magnificent post. Also, Ive shared your web website in my social networks! 750795

  3. 895978 807449yourselfm as burning with excitement along accumulative concentrating. alter ego was rather apocalyptic by the mated ethical self went up to. Its punk up to closed ego dispirited. All respecting those topics are movables her need to discover no finish touching unpronounced. Thanks so considerably! 462222

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *