NRA, gun owner sue San Jose over liability law, requiring owners to pay annual fee and obtain insurance

Second Amendment

SAN JOSE, Calif. — A gun rights group and a gun owner have filed a lawsuit against San Jose for a newly passed ordinance requiring citizens to obtain firearm liability insurance and pay an annual fee.

The National Association for Gun Rights and gun owner Mark Sikes sued San Jose in federal court Tuesday after City Council members voted to approve the ordinance believed to be the first measure of its kind in the United States. Sikes is from San Jose.

RELATED: San Jose becomes 1st in US to require gun liability insurance, city officials say

“The law is unconstitutional,” Harmeet Dhillon, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said Wednesday. “The law compels people to purchase insurance that doesn’t necessarily exist and that demonstrates that this law is not a good faith attempt to do anything other than ban or burden the lawful possession of guns.”

The San Jose City Council overwhelmingly approved the measure despite opposition from gun owners who said it would violate their Second Amendment rights.

Dhillon said the law also infringes on the First Amendment by compelling gun owners to pay an annual fee to a not-yet-formed nonprofit that could promote a message they don’t agree with.

VIDEO: SJ mandates videotaping of all gun purchases just weeks after deadly mass shooting

“The Ordinance even prohibits the city from directing how the non-profit would use the funds. The one thing that is clear is that the organization will likely be dedicated to exclusively preaching the negative risks of gun ownership,” the lawsuit says.

San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo said that having liability insurance would encourage people in the 55,000 households in San Jose who legally own at least one registered gun to have gun safes, install trigger locks and take gun safety classes.

The liability insurance would cover losses or damages resulting from any accidental use of the firearm, including death, injury or property damage, according to the ordinance. If a gun is stolen or lost, the owner of the firearm would be considered liable until the theft or loss is reported to authorities.

However, gun owners who don’t have insurance won’t lose their guns or face any criminal charges, the mayor said.

VIDEO: San Jose mass shooting: Victims remembered after attack at VTA light rail yard

Copyright © 2022 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.

Source link

Articles You May Like

Governor Gavin Newsom proposes 28th Amendment to combat gun violence
Karen Elson, Remi Wolf Highlight Gun Reform at Everytown Event – Rolling Stone
‘You can’t be serious’: Gavin Newsom mocks Mississippi GOP gov for challenging him to a gun ‘debate’
Newsom Faces Backlash on Plan to Add Gun Ownership Restrictions to Constitution
Fourth victim in John Rumpel Cessna plane crash identified as Evadnie Smith with tributes paid to ‘loving Nanny V’


  1. 382675 512638I discovered your weblog internet site web site on google and appearance some of your early posts. Preserve up the wonderful operate. I just extra increase Feed to my MSN News Reader. Searching for toward reading far more by you later on! 350503

  2. 700549 875667Ill proper away grasp your rss feed as I cant in obtaining your email subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service. Do youve any? Please let me recognize so that I may subscribe. Thanks. 326096

  3. 743102 663874Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to assert that I get in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access consistently swiftly. 508461

  4. 290375 215458There a couple of fascinating points in time in this post but I dont know if I see these center to heart. There may be some validity but Ill take hold opinion until I explore it further. Exceptional write-up , thanks and then we want a good deal more! Put into FeedBurner too 210893

  5. 778850 802873Your talent is actually appreciated!! Thank you. You saved me plenty of frustration. I switched from Joomla to Drupal towards the WordPress platform and Ive fully embraced WordPress. Its so much easier and easier to tweak. Anyway, thanks once more. Awesome domain! 939338

  6. Pingback: hindi movie online
  7. 106601 657627Satisfying posting. It would appear that a great deal of the stages are depending upon the originality aspect. Its a funny thing about life in case you refuse to accept anything but the very best, you very often get it. by W. Somerset Maugham.. 745464

  8. 985770 920698Hello! I could have sworn Ive been to this weblog before but following browsing through some with the post I realized it is new to me. Anyways, Im definitely pleased I discovered it and Ill be book-marking and checking back regularly! 355297

  9. 67711 437955I basically could not go away your site prior to suggesting that I in fact enjoyed the normal details an individual supply to your visitors? Is gonna be once more continuously so that you can have a look at new posts 993423

  10. 837729 627315I adore the look of your web site. I lately built mine and I was looking for some style suggestions and you gave me several. May possibly I ask you whether you developed the site by youself? 325125

  11. 460960 40171Thanks for some other great post. Exactly where else may possibly just anyone get that type of info in such an perfect means of writing? Ive a presentation next week, and Im at the search for such info. 552756

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *