Oregon’s New Gun Control Law Sparks Buying Spree As Thousands Race To Get Firearms

Second Amendment


  • A new Oregon gun control law, considered one of the most restrictive in the US, led to a massive increase in attempted firearms purchases.
  • The measure, often referred to as the Reduction of Gun Violence Act, will require deeper background checks, firearm training, fingerprint collection and a permit to purchase any firearm, according to the legislation.
  • The Oregon state police reported more than 18,000 transactions during election week, resulting in a backlog in background checks, according to KGW8. Background checks skyrocketed from 850 per day before the midterms to 4,000 per day after the law passed.

Oregon’s new law that will rigidly tighten the state’s gun restrictions led to a massive uptick in attempted firearms purchases, according to NBC affiliate KGW8.

Ballot Measure 114 was passed during the midterm elections and is credited as one of the most restrictive gun laws in the country, sending background checks skyrocketing from 850 per day, prior to the midterms, to 4,000 per day after the law’s passing, according to KGW8. The measure, often referred to as the Reduction of Gun Violence Act, will require deeper background checks, firearm training, fingerprint collection and a permit to purchase any firearm, according to the legislation, set to be effective in December. (RELATED: Oregon Voters Narrowly Pass Highly Restrictive Gun Control Measure That Creates ‘Database’ Of Gun Owners)

The Oregon state police reported more than 18,000 transactions during election week, resulting in a backlog in background checks, according to KGW8. In 2020, COVID-19 restrictions caused a backlog in background checks that eventually leveled off right before the elections, the Oregon State Police reported.

The measure’s requirements have caused controversy for gun owners in Oregon, leading Lincoln County Sheriff Curtis Landers to release a statement Wednesday clarifying the new law.

Landers clarified the permit process, stating that training is similar to the requirements for obtaining a Concealed Handgun License (CHL) but will require that all residents who want to purchase a gun fire the weapon during training, he said. Landers also addressed the magazine capacity restriction in the measure, which requires a 10 round capacity, telling residents that magazines over 10 rounds can be legally purchased, but it must be before the law goes into effect.

The measure’s magazine restriction is being challenged as unconstitutional, and a federal lawsuit has been filed in California’s 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, according to KGW8. If the court rules that it is unconstitutional, it will apply to both California and Oregon.

“The purchase permit requires a training course similar to the CHL process, but this law requires a demonstration to load, unload, store, and “fire” the firearm. The CHL course can be substituted if it contains all the provisions, however, most CHL courses currently do not include “firing” the firearm,” Landers said in the statement.

Landers said that while he does not agree with Ballot Measure 114, he will enforce it.

“I know this law is very controversial and passed by a very narrow margin. The branches of government are very clear and law enforcement is in the executive branch with the duty to enforce laws. The judicial branch evaluates and interprets the laws as constitutional or not,” he said.

The National Rifle Association has been working against the measure, and identified key issues in the measure’s language.

“The ballot measure gives the power to each permit issuing department to annually publish ‘any additional information that it determines would be helpful’ to the process. That information includes names, addresses, and a whole host of additional personal information that would be released to the public,” NRA spokesperson Lars Dalseide previously told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “This ballot measure fails to safeguard law-abiding gun owners’ personal information – and, by proxy, information of families, friends, and employers – being made public. Failing to include those safeguards puts lives and property at risk.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.





Source link

Articles You May Like

I can’t forget the Sandy Hook shooting
SHEILA NAZARIAN: It’s Time For Jews To Take Advantage Of The Second Amendment
ILA | CA DOJ Gun Owner Data Leak Due to “Deficiencies in Policies, Procedures, and Inadequate Oversight” Study Finds
ILA | Ohio: Emergency Powers Bill Advances to House Floor
Latest Oregon Measure 114 developments: What is the status of challenges to new gun limits?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *