Maryland bill would require gun owners to buy up to $300K in liability insurance

Concealed Carry


Gun owners in Maryland would be required to buy at least $300,000 in liability insurance or forfeit their ability to carry a firearm under a new bill.

The controversial legislation, introduced by Delegate Terri Hill, D-Howard County, would prohibit the “wear or carry” of a gun anywhere in the state unless the individual has obtained a liability insurance policy of at least $300,000.

“A person may not wear or carry a firearm unless the person has obtained it and is covered by liability insurance issued by an insurer authorized to do business in the State under the Insurance Article to cover claims for property damage, bodily injury, or death arising from an accident resulting from the person’s use or storage of a firearm or up to $300,000 for damages arising from the same incident, in addition to interest and costs,” the proposed Maryland legislation said.

RED STATE’S NRA-BACKED BILL TO ALLOW ARMED TEACHERS IN CLASSROOM ONE STEP CLOSER TO PASSAGE

Maryland House Democrats introduced a controversial law that would require firearm owners to get at least $300,000 in liability insurance. (iStock)

According to the proposed law, the liability insurance requirement does not apply to members of the military or federal law enforcement officers. 

banner

There is also an insurance exemption if a gun is unloaded.

Signage declares no firearms allowed on private property

Sign with text reading No Firearms Allowed on this Property, with a handgun in a red crossed circle, indicating to concealed carry permit holders that carrying of firearms is restricted, on a retail store in San Ramon, California, July 21, 2019. (Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)

Hill told FOX 45 News that this bill is an attempt to pass “common sense” gun control.

MARYLAND COUNTY’S GUN SAFETY PAMPHLET LAW UPHELD IN FEDERAL APPEALS COURT

She told the local outlet that the idea came after talking to a concerned constituent who said that gun owners should “bear some liability in cases where there is damage because of guns being used in ways that cause harm.”

Firearms on display at Oregon gun store

FILE – Firearms are displayed at a gun shop in Oregon., on Feb. 19, 2021. (AP Photo/Andrew Selsky, File) (AP Photo/Andrew Selsky, File)

Gun advocate Frank Duffy noted to the outlet that the legislation is yet another effort to hinder individuals from carrying their firearms.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

“It’s another effort by the state to throw an obstacle in front of people trying to get their conceal carry permits,” Duffy said. “The Supreme Court made a decision that said Maryland and other states could not require a good or substantial reason to get a permit.”





Source link

Articles You May Like

Donald Trump has vowed to undo gun restrictions if re-elected. Here’s what we know
Kyle Rittenhouse’s Fight With Republican Lawmaker Heats Up — With Kyle Continuing to Make a Fool of Himself
There are ways to counter disgraced NRA leader’s pervasive effect on America
NRA wrong about Maine gun safety bills
Former CEO Wayne LaPierre Ordered to Repay over $4 Million to NRA

3 Comments

  1. helloI like your writing very so much proportion we keep up a correspondence extra approximately your post on AOL I need an expert in this space to unravel my problem May be that is you Taking a look forward to see you

  2. What i do not understood is in truth how you are not actually a lot more smartlyliked than you may be now You are very intelligent You realize therefore significantly in the case of this topic produced me individually imagine it from numerous numerous angles Its like men and women dont seem to be fascinated until it is one thing to do with Woman gaga Your own stuffs nice All the time care for it up

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *